Quote:
Originally Posted by rjwould
we can elect a president who is familiar with the political system, national security and foreign policy so the country can run the way it was designed to by its founders...
|
I'm not sure that "so" is a reasonable connector there. One can have A without performing B even though you need A to do B properly.
There's a built-in problem with Hillary winning, much though I admire her. There's so much negativity among her many detractors that she'd be a lame duck from the first day, all her efforts would be focused on answering bile-laden critics. There's no honeymoon with Hillary, there's no free hand to create a new environment with the sympathetic acquiescence of the population which every president's traditionally started with.
On the plus side though, she's the only potential President with a guarantee there's no skeletons in her closet, she's been stripped and paraded for the last fifteen years by the extraordinarily nasty let's-rape-the-Clintons wing of the Republican party. All those moral midget Ann Coulters have given her the stamp of purity usually associated with your average Seraphim.