Abortion will not solve overpopulation in the long run.

[RedGlitter]

I think these are all perfectly reasonable, and very attractive schemes for solving the worlds problems, any takers?

Those ideas were brilliant!

[BTS]

Originally Posted by Accountable

But all those guys are gay, right?

I agree with Jester, I'd never go with a guy who didn't pull his own










...............















......................















...........



weight.

Golly I missed this one the first tyme around........
I'm pulling ................Really hard

[spot]

This OP was originally posted at Politics Forum .org - View topic - Make homosexuality mandatory in males in 2006.

[AussiePam]

Sigh.... Jester, Red Glitter, Galbally...

[Bill Sikes]

Originally Posted by AussiePam

Galbally...

What happened to him? I have noticed his absence, but am unaware of why. I had thought it was probably an attack of Real Life.

[spot]

Originally Posted by AussiePam

Sigh.... Jester, Red Glitter, Galbally...

I'll put my hand up for one of those but not the other two.

[luciferjohn]

Originally Posted by joona

I am sure that most of you agree with me when I express my concern about the current problem the humanity is facing: Overpopulation. Forced abortion is a cruel practice, and should not be a solution. I have a better solution: It will be neccessary to introduce forced homosexuality upon males.

For the following reasons:

1. Heterosexual mating rituals have always evolved into destructive wars that kill millions, and no longer ensure a "stronger" genetic pool.

2. Homosexual men do not contribute to overpopulation, or the repression of women.

3. Heterosexual men do not mix well in coed situations. They make mixed gender activities problamatic, thus contributing to a division among humans by gender.

4. By opening men up to empathy in other men, it will foster greater friendship relations among males in general, a gender that has extremely low quality friendships because of its "natural" inclination towards violence towards other males.


But wouldn't the human race die off this way?

This is one of the easiest to disprove assertions in the world. If all men were gay, we would still reproduce by artificial insemination. That way, there would only be INTENTIONAL births. Only people interested in starting a family would have children.
That is not what happens today. Men who have no interest whatsoever in having a family end up impregnating women when all they wanted was to have their penis stimulated.
It's either convert to gaydom, or watch the population spiral out of control until some awful war probably kills every one of us, gay and straight.
I go with being gay to save the world.
I have a feeling this might be a harder sell in the Moslem countries, but damn it, I really believe in this initiative!

People need a lot more imagination and openness to new ideas if the human race is going to survive. The lack of real diversity of opinion amidst this huge paradigm shift, is really discouraging.
Without the ability to adapt, we humans will be sooooo finished with our 15 minutes of evolutionary fame.
We need to at least try to improve as a species, even if we have to break every fingernail and spiked heel along the way!
If you're not in favour of mandatory homosexuality, just state your reasons why. If they're all inane and homophobic, then I may actually have a point.

Mandatory homosexuality won't get rid of Wal-Mart or TV, but it might make enough of a difference in people's lives that they might question some of their other "conventional wisdom" regarding wealth, work, sharing, competition and shared values.

i disagree why? i like sex with women too much.
and chuck ( my friend) says im not attractive