"9/11 Mysteries" Movie

Everyone needs to watch this.

[Hugh Janus]

HMMMMMMMmmm

[anastrophe]

seen it. slick editing, ominous voice-overs, a well-mixed music track, and paranoia rather than skepticism, are no substitutes for the boring and dry facts of the case.

oh, they're a substitute for the gullible and credulous, to be sure. and those who like to be entertained. hey, i've found all of these conspiracy videos about 9/11 very entertaining, much like a good action-adventure movie is entertaining. but both genres are based on fiction rather than fact.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

but hey, if the boring, dry facts leave you yearning for more, here's an entertaining anti-conspiracy-theory 9/11 video.



Note: lots and lots of swearing (a clever way of avoiding liability).

[Hugh Janus]

Originally Posted by anastrophe

ominous voice-overs,

Ominous voice-over?
Have you been watching the same film I did? The voice-over I remember seemed to belong to some tart that wished she had got the part in the latest porn movie....

Oh btw. The link doesn't work....

[koan]

I thought it was the best presentation of the sort yet. It was very well organised, didn't jump around and left out any artsy fartsy stuff that takes away from credibility. I thought it was fairly convincing. Disturbingly so.

[anastrophe]

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus

Ominous voice-over?
Have you been watching the same film I did? The voice-over I remember seemed to belong to some tart that wished she had got the part in the latest porn movie....

Oh btw. The link doesn't work....

the link works fine.

-----correction. the link works fine. the embedded video isn't working for some reason. here's the direct link to the video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...21158523&hl=en

[spot]

Originally Posted by anastrophe

i've found all of these conspiracy videos about 9/11 very entertaining, much like a good action-adventure movie is entertaining. but both genres are based on fiction rather than fact.

NIST still hasn't published a report on WTC7? That'll be an interesting read when it happens, then.

You've transformed objectivity into religious belief. Start with "my government couldn't have been party to a crime this huge" and then work backward from the given fact to interpret what you can see and read.

While we're waiting for the 9/11 house of cards to collapse, here's a what-if for you. If a whistleblower publishes enough to demonstrate that the government brought down WTC7 as a deliberate pre-planned act, should Presidential pardons for the planners implicated be retrospectively overturned if any future President signs them? Try to avoid "I don't discuss hypotheticals" if you can, this is only a bulletin board, not an interview on CNN.

Originally Posted by anastrophe

the link works fine.

-----correction. the link works fine. the embedded video isn't working for some reason. here's the direct link to the video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...21158523&hl=en

Are you SERIOUS!
the real conspiracy is the official story, that video is pathetic claptrap produced for the brain dead,
i prefer to listen to the experts not this abhorrence...
i bet you even believe in magic bullets dont you?
the twin towers and building 7 were controlled demolitions, even the ppl who built the dam things agree, but you know better and post an ignorant video, which suggests we're all disillusioned...

David Ray Griffin

[spot]

Originally Posted by Novelty

you know better and post an ignorant video, which suggests we're all disillusioned...

Illusioned, surely?

I'd love to be disillusioned about it, honestly. I suspect we're more likely to find people publishing source documentation sooner rather than later, though, and blowing the entire set of events wide open. The question isn't really "did it happen", it's more "who authorized and implemented it".