More On Scott Peterson

Hey i found this on www.scottisinnocent.com. I thought it was interesting and i remember them saying all this on the news. It is the same reason i thought/think he was/is innocent. I am not sure what i think anymore. I am so confused.. but I am addicted to this case.. I know it is over but something keeps drawing me back to it. Let me know what you think. They are saying Anne Bird wrote her book & lyed in it just get back at Jackie... That was on another site. & Amber just wanted $$$$$. Enjoy.

The Tests Don't Lie

So much is made, by those who believe Scott is guilty, that Scott lied so much how can anyone believe anything that he says. The truth of the matter is, we don't have to believe anything Scott says. We don't have to believe any one that has a vested interest in this case. We don't have to determine who is telling the truth and who isn't. We don't have to decide whose motives are pure and whose bias is objective.

Why? Because the forensic testing speaks loud and clear, and requires no interpretation, has no ulterior motive, and cannot be misunderstood.

It is not always the case that the forensic testing is so conclusive -- in some cases it still is very much subject to interpretation.

But, in this case, it is absolutely reliable.

Why? Because all of it contradicted the State's case. It was all collected by the State, controlled by the State, tested by the State, and reported by the State.

And all the tests came back NEGATIVE.

At every step of the way, those participating in its collection, testing, and reporting had a vested interest in the test results.

And all the tests came back NEGATIVE.

We don't have to take Scott's word for where he was on Dec. 24, and what time he was there, because he left a paper trail that proves, without bias, where he was and when.

We don't have to take Scott's word for why the mops and bucket were outside the door, or why anyone would be mopping the floor the day after the maid mopped, because the forensic testing proves with absolute certainty that the mops and bucket were not used to clean up a crime scene. That makes what they were used for totally irrelevant.

We don't have to understand why Scott washed his clothes or why and how they got wet, because the forensic testing proves with absolute certainty that he did not commit the crimes he was convicted of wearing those clothes. That makes everything else about the clothes totally irrelevant.

We don't have to understand why Scott was vacuuming on Dec 25, because the forensic testing proves with absolute certainty that the vacuum cleaner was not used to clean up a crime scene. That makes everything else about the vacuum cleaner or the vacuuming totally irrelevant.

We don't have to know where the pliers came from or how the hair got into them, because the forensic testing proves with absolute certainty that the pliers were not used to cut the chicken wire and had not been used recently enough to be involved in the crime. That makes everything else about the pliers and the hair totally irrelevant.

Everything that the state presented as evidence against Scott was inconclusive, subject to a range of interpretation; everything that was tested was absolutely conclusive that Scott did not murder Laci.

What was tested? Everything in that house that had the least hint of suspicion -- blood stains that they had to mark their location with sticky-notes because they were so small they wouldn't show up in the pictures. Everything in the pickup that had the least hint of suspicion. Everything in the boat that had the least hint of suspicion.

Besides collecting items for testing, cadaver dogs and scent dogs were used. Their results were inconclusive; most of it was not even allowed in as testimony it was so inconclusive. What was let in was contradicted with other dog testimony.

The State said Laci and Conner washed ashore, yet their own expert could not get them back to the same place, and the best dive and sonar teams could not find any evidence they had been where they should have been. So what difference does it make why Scott went fishing, or if he should have gone fishing, or what time of day he went fishing, or if he told some he was fishing and some he was golfing, because the State's own experts and other witnesses proved with a preponderance of the evidence that Laci was not where Scott was fishing.

So, when it gets right down to it, who cares whether Anne is telling the truth or Scott; whether Amber is telling the truth or Scott -- because the forensic testing proves that Scott did not murder Laci in that house or transport her in that pickup or boat, or dump her in the bay. The entirety of the forensic testing proves absolutely that Scott did not murder Laci in that house or transport her in that pickup or boat; and the preponderance of the evidence provided by the State itself proves that Scott did not dump Laci in the bay on that fishing trip.

All the accusations Anne Bird makes in her book, and all the heretofore secret documents that Catherine Crier cites in her book are meaningless as proof -- and no claims that Scott did this or that, or that his mother did this or that, can dispute the absolute certainty of the forensic testing.

Tell me why I should not place absolute trust in the forensic testing in this case to declare that Scott is 100% factually innocent of the crimes he has been convicted of. Give me one good reason why I should favor gossip over forensic testing.

[robinseggs]

Wow. Are you nuts? Please Let Laci and Connor rest. There is a lot you don't know.

[lady cop]

TMBSGRL...trust me on this...the SII site is a bunch of raving loons!! . and don't rely on anne bird or amber frye or gloria (ambulance-chaser) allred, or any pundits for that matter. read the trial transcript. the facts. you, my friend, are going to the police academy to become a detective one day! so you will learn to separate out the interested parties (books) from the irrefutable facts. whenever you want to talk about the case, just email me.

Scott Peterson is shown being taken to San Quentin last week

Not Nuts.. I promise.. Just confused. I have read so many different articles. I have followed this since the beginning. My husband and I both have... I have a friend that grew up with Scott.. He used to live in Ca across from the house Scott grew up in. He said there is No WAY that he would do something like this to his wife. He was the reason i believe that Scott might have been innocent. Then I listen to LC and the news and believe otherwise. Either way the truth will come out.. Either he'll end up admitting he did it or they will find out he didn't do it. I don't know. and i am trying not to care.

[Paula]

If Scott had his nuts removed while Laci was pregnant, none of this would have happened? He is obviously guilty, and Amber fueled Scott to murder. There is no question, he is guilty. Anyone who thinks different is a loser. This is the world we live in now, anything goes. Peterson was so stupid, i cannot explain. You could see the words SEX in his eyeballs. BAD BOY....

Originally Posted by Paula

If Scott had his nuts removed while Laci was pregnant, none of this would have happened? He is obviously guilty, and Amber fueled Scott to murder. There is no question, he is guilty. Anyone who thinks different is a loser. This is the world we live in now, anything goes. Peterson was so stupid, i cannot explain. You could see the words SEX in his eyeballs. BAD BOY....

Thanks Paula.

[robinseggs]

Originally Posted by tmbsgrl

Not Nuts.. I promise.. Just confused. I have read so many different articles. I have followed this since the beginning. My husband and I both have... I have a friend that grew up with Scott.. He used to live in Ca across from the house Scott grew up in. He said there is No WAY that he would do something like this to his wife. He was the reason i believe that Scott might have been innocent. Then I listen to LC and the news and believe otherwise. Either way the truth will come out.. Either he'll end up admitting he did it or they will find out he didn't do it. I don't know. and i am trying not to care.

Don't let your confusion blind you. Have you really followed this since the beginning? As far as the friend that grew up with Scott, I can understand how hard it is to not believe HIM. Our friends are people we trust. However, people change and the young Scott your friend remembers became an adult, one with a string of lying/deceptive/psychopathic behaviors starting at least as early as his college years. Many witnesses testified to the existence of these behaviors, some of them downright frightening. I know your friend said there is "NO WAY" Scott could have done something like this to his wife, but believe me, if Laci were alive today, she would tell you she thought the same....she married him afterall, didn't she? Unfortunately she was betrayed. Scott was a pathological liar a fact not disputed by the medical profession. Personally, I don't think he knew he was a murderer. It was only when the marriage and impending arrival of a baby started cramping his lifestyle, did he come to seek out desperate measures and began to hatch a plan to eliminate Laci/Connor from his life. That is the sick part about it....in his pathological delusional mind, he actually believed he could carry out this plan and get away with it/and DID it! I don't know, think what you want, but it really saddens me that there are people out there ......after everything now.....who still can't believe he is guilty. What part don't you get? Everything in life isn't in black or white...it just ISN'T ....there ARE shades of grey. You can sit and call so many things circumstantial....over and over and over......but what more do you want? The video?? .....think of Laci and Connor...how can you honestly think he DIDN'T do it? It is noble of you to sincerely have wanted to give Scott a fair shot, really, but face it, everything always came back to Scott. So if he believe he possible is innocent, what is YOUR theory? I am not looking to condemn, I am just curious.

[David813]

Scott will be a welcome addition to the San Quinton menu.

[lady cop]

Originally Posted by David813

Scott will be a welcome addition to the San Quinton menu.

if by that you mean he will be someone's bitch, it's not going to happen. death row inmates are segregated except on the rec yard. they are PC /AC...protective and administrative custody. everyone's little "OZ" prison rape/shank fantasies are just that.

[Peg]

Anyone who thinks different is a loser.

wtf?