I learnt a valuable lesson from my dog. To kick some grass over the crap In life, walk away and move on.
Avatar pic Is " SPRINTER SACRE "
In theory, the Council of Europe, a body with 47 member states which oversees the Strasbourg court, could retaliate against Mrs May by expelling Britain.
That would be bad for who? Does anybody believe they would walk away from easily assumed power?
But this has not happened to other countries found guilty of flouting human rights laws in the past.
By whose authority has Great Britain been convicted "fluting human rights?"?
NON IMPEDITI RATIONE COGITATIONIS
I feel I'm with you on this oscar. I don't really know the situation as well as you but Ms. May seems right to me, prima facie.
The key word is "vow". Has she delivered yet?
How do you know a politician is bulls**ting you?
Theresa May Is the only politician who delivers. She has a good history of delivering. She Is also challenging UK Judges to abolish the human rights section ' The right to family life'... this Is the one Immigrants use when facing deportation.Originally Posted by Scrat
BBC News - Theresa May to give judges new deportation guidance
I learnt a valuable lesson from my dog. To kick some grass over the crap In life, walk away and move on.
Avatar pic Is " SPRINTER SACRE "
No it's not a great day for british justice. What it means is that of you are a victim of persecution by the vbritish givernment or feel you have been unjustly treated by the british legal system you will lose the last place where you will be able to appeal for justice. As usual the daily mail just picks on the extreme cases and completely ignores not only the actual facts of a case but all the other instances where thwe ciurt if human rights has handed down decisions that most normal people would agree were right.
What has the European Court of Human Rights ever done for us? - Home News - UK - The Independent
The tories are fascists that don't want their decisions being challenged in the courts. Do some research on the matter and stop believing the daily mail is right every time.
Eight cases out of 955 which ruled against the UK government, wow they are really getting stuck in there aren't theyIt is an ironic situation bearing in mind Britain has an enviable reputation for human rights with less than 3 per cent of applications considered admissible and of those, just half succeed. Last year the court dealt with 955 applications from the UK, of which only 19 were considered admissible and eight were ruled a violation of the convention.
The vast majority of the Rule 39 urgent applications relate to asylum seekers facing immediate deportation. Unless there is an “irreversible risk of harm” they are rejected, as are 95 per cent from Britain.
“If you have Supreme Court judges who take the European Convention on Human Rights as seriously as it is done in Britain, it is much more unlikely that the court finds violations because the job has been done on a national level,” explained President Spielmann.
Only issues that require “fine tuning” ever reach Strasbourg and, as a result, they are likely to be the most contentious.
What would happen if the UK withdrew from the European Court of Human Rights?
What would happen if the UK withdrew from the European Court of Human Rights?
It was us that played a major part in setting these courts up they have been heavily influenced by the british legal system. Get a griop on rwality, our politicians don;t like the courts because it stops them doing what they like.Context is everything – European Court of Human Rights struck out 99% of UK cases in 2012
Posted by scrat
Simple, are they talking? If yes then you know they are.How do you know a politician is bulls**ting you?
posted by anne boelyn
She's not. Let me put it this way - your president has been given the power to arrest american citizens and hold them without trial. Maybe you were one of those who thought it didn't matter when it was foreigners but now it's americans as well. That's the problem with a supreme court appointed by politicians they pack the bench to suit. With us even with that power the European courts are a place we could appeal to AGAINST our government.I feel I'm with you on this oscar. I don't really know the situation as well as you but Ms. May seems right to me, prima facie.
Our house of lords prevented ton y blair doing the same thing here but if it had failed then at least someone could have appealed to the european courts. Now teresa may wants to remove that right, she's an idiot and only idiots would support her. Anyone who thinks a british government would never be repressive does not know our history.
There's one enormous factor that you seem to be over-looking my little Scottish nationalist and that Is, we, the UK already have courts.
It just means that Judges can use the law without a ruling from the Strasbourg.
The final right of appeal would be to the British Supreme Court, rather than Strasbourg pr have you failed to grasp that?
Perhaps it's you who needs a little more research ?
I learnt a valuable lesson from my dog. To kick some grass over the crap In life, walk away and move on.
Avatar pic Is " SPRINTER SACRE "
Most of the detail goes right over my head............but.
We joined the club, we had input for the club rules, more have joined the club, now they have a larger input with the rules.
We are now throwing our toys out of the pram.
The vision of the EU was a United States of Europe, others will outvote us, that is Democracy on a continental scale.
We should either stay in and try to influence the course, accepting when the majority win, or bugger off outside it.
We are either in or out.
I thought I knew more than this until I opened my mouth
I'm surprised you haven't worked out the connection.
Abu Qatada appealed time and time again right to the Grand Chamber of the European court of Human Rights to avoid deportation to stand trial In Jordon.
When Theresa May lost after fighting tooth and nail, she vowed that she would do whatever It took to rid Britain of him.....
Remember now ?
I learnt a valuable lesson from my dog. To kick some grass over the crap In life, walk away and move on.
Avatar pic Is " SPRINTER SACRE "
"She's not. Let me put it this way - your president has been given the power to arrest american citizens and hold them without trial. Maybe you were one of those who thought it didn't matter when it was foreigners but now it's americans as well. That's the problem with a supreme court appointed by politicians they pack the bench to suit. With us even with that power the European courts are a place we could appeal to AGAINST our government."
Hope you're not speaking of someone like Anwar al-Awlaki. He got what he richly deserved.
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks