Make these ads go away.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 372 of 374 FirstFirst ... 272 322 362 370 371 372 373 374 LastLast
Results 3,711 to 3,720 of 3738

Thread: Science Disproves Evolution

  1. #3711
    Ted
    Currently Online Now
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    ----
     

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Gabriola Island BC
    Posts
    5,277
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    02:52 AM
    Points
    5,696

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Still the same silly game.

  2. #3712
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    Cool
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    9,279
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    28,716
    Gifts Kitten

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted View Post
    Still the same silly game.
    Thanks for proving my point that you're nothing but a charlatan. You've never read a sentence on evolution.

  3. #3713
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    ----
     
    FourPart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    5,867
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    10:52 AM
    Points
    27,086
    Gifts Beer Cake

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Pahu pasting the same old claptrap doesn't make it any less bollocks. Nobody bothers to read it. We've seen it all before - time & time again. This thread currently has 372 pages. If all Pahu's duplicate postings were removed that would crunch it down to about 20 - if that. It's not that the content is a load of crap, it's that it's the same old crap. Nothing in the way of discussion. No attempt to debate the issue, citing sources. No sign of independant thought. Just paste, paste & paste again. Any other forum would (and most already have) ban him for flooding.

  4. #3714
    Ted
    Currently Online Now
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    ----
     

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Gabriola Island BC
    Posts
    5,277
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    02:52 AM
    Points
    5,696

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Some folks need their egos boosted up all the time.

  5. #3715
    Senior Member
    is IF YOU WANT TO ACCEPT JESUS'S GIFT OF SALVATION, PRAY THIS FROM YOUR HEART:“DEAR LORD JESUS, I BELIEVE YOU DIED AND ROSE FROM THE DEAD FOR MY SINS. PLEASE COME INTO MY HEART AND FORGIVE ME FOR MY SINS, I NOW RECEIVE YOU IN JESUS NAME AMEN.”
     
    I am:
    ----
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,201
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    4,622

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by Pahu View Post

    Out-of-Sequence Fossils 4


    Amber, found in Illinois coal beds, contain chemical signatures showing that the amber came from flowering plants, but flowering plants supposedly evolved 170 million years after the coal formed (i). In the Grand Canyon, in Venezuela, in Kashmir, and in Guyana, spores of ferns and pollen from flowering plants are found in Cambrian (j) rocks—rocks supposedly deposited before flowering plants evolved. Pollen has also been found in Precambrian (k) rocks deposited before life allegedly evolved.


    Figure 12: Insect in Amber. The best-preserved fossils are encased in amber, protected from air and water and buried in the ground. Amber, a golden resin (similar to sap or pitch) usually from conifer trees such as pines, may also contain other preservatives. No transitional forms of life have been found in amber, despite evolutionary-based ages of 1.5–300 million years. Animal behaviors, unchanged from today, are seen in three-dimensional detail. For example, ants in amber show the same social and work patterns as ants today.

    Experts bold enough to explain how these fossils formed say that hurricane-force winds must have snapped off trees at their trunks, causing huge amounts of resin to spill out and act like flypaper. Debris and small organisms were blown into the sticky resin, which was later covered by more resin and finally buried. (Part II of this book will show that such conditions arose during the flood.)

    In a clean-room laboratory, 30–40 dormant, but living, bacteria species were removed from intestines of bees encased in amber from the Dominican Republic. When cultured, the bacteria grew! [See “Old DNA, Bacteria, and Proteins?”] This amber is claimed to be 25–40 million years old, but I suspect it formed at the time of the flood, only thousands of years ago. Is it more likely that bacteria can be kept alive thousands of years or many millions of years? Metabolism rates, even in dormant bacteria, are not zero.

    i. “A type of amber thought to have been invented by flowering plants may have been en vogue millions of years before those plants evolved...When the researchers analyzed the amber, though, they discovered a chemical signature know[n] only from the amber of flowering plants.” Rachel Ehrenberg, “Flowerless Plants Also Made Form of Fancy Amber,” Science News, Vol. 176, 24 October 2009, p. 5.

    “[The Illinois amber] has a molecular composition that has been seen only from angiosperms, which appeared much later in the Early Cretaceous.... [Amber resins] are so diverse that those from each plant species have a distinctive Py-GC-MS fingerprint that can be used to identify the plants that produced various ambers around the world.” David Grimaldi, “Pushing Back Amber Production,” Science, Vol. 326, 2 October 2009, p. 51.

    j. R. M. Stainforth, “Occurrence of Pollen and Spores in the Roraima Formation of Venezuela and British Guiana,” Nature, Vol. 210, 16 April 1966, pp. 292–294.

    A. K. Ghosh and A. Bose, pp. 796–797.

    A. K. Ghosh and A. Bose, “Spores and Tracheids from the Cambrian of Kashmir,” Nature, Vol. 169, 21 June 1952, pp. 1056–1057.

    J. Coates et al., pp. 266–267.

    k. George F. Howe et al., “A Pollen Analysis of Hakatai Shale and Other Grand Canyon Rocks,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 24, March 1988, pp. 173–182.

    [From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
    It's amazing the amount of evidence that Creationists have that disproves Darwinian Evolution. Thanks for sharing!

  6. #3716
    Proudly humble
    is Lost in the Ozone, again.
     
    I am:
    Cool
     
    LarsMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    usually on the road to somewhere.
    Posts
    9,528
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    36,417
    Gifts Beer Balloons Gift Car Beer

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by xfrodobagginsx View Post
    It's amazing the amount of evidence that Creationists have that disproves Darwinian Evolution. Thanks for sharing!
    It's amazing how Creationists can cling to the slightest bit of useless information and claim it as evidence.
    "The trouble with people isn't that they don't know, but that they know so much that ain't so."
    - Anonymous

  7. #3717
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    ----
     
    Pahu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,623
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    6,096

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
    It's amazing how Creationists can cling to the slightest bit of useless information and claim it as evidence.
    In what way is it not evidence?
    Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

  8. #3718
    Proudly humble
    is Lost in the Ozone, again.
     
    I am:
    Cool
     
    LarsMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    usually on the road to somewhere.
    Posts
    9,528
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    36,417
    Gifts Beer Balloons Gift Car Beer

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by Pahu View Post
    In what way is it not evidence?
    Well, let's just say that there is plenty of evidence, now, that indicates that Amber predates Angiosperms.
    Therefore it is apparent that the assumption that Amber only appeared after Angiosperms developed is was incorrect.
    Your examples seem to miss that fact.

    Thing about science is that when someone says, "A-HAH! look what I found. This means thus and such!" they are speaking based upon current findings.
    When someone finds something new, that new data can supersede previous assertions.

    That, my dear fellow, is Science.
    And the fact that some of a scientist's assertions made in the mid 19th century have been proved incorrect does not make everything he wrote invalid.
    "The trouble with people isn't that they don't know, but that they know so much that ain't so."
    - Anonymous

  9. #3719
    Senior Member
    This user has no status.
     
    I am:
    ----
     
    Pahu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,623
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    6,096

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Quote Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
    Well, let's just say that there is plenty of evidence, now, that indicates that Amber predates Angiosperms.
    Therefore it is apparent that the assumption that Amber only appeared after Angiosperms developed is was incorrect.
    Your examples seem to miss that fact.

    Thing about science is that when someone says, "A-HAH! look what I found. This means thus and such!" they are speaking based upon current findings.
    When someone finds something new, that new data can supersede previous assertions.

    That, my dear fellow, is Science.
    And the fact that some of a scientist's assertions made in the mid 19th century have been proved incorrect does not make everything he wrote invalid.
    The evidence is factual and up to date.
    Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

  10. #3720
    Proudly humble
    is Lost in the Ozone, again.
     
    I am:
    Cool
     
    LarsMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    usually on the road to somewhere.
    Posts
    9,528
    Local Date
    11-24-2017
    Local Time
    05:52 AM
    Points
    36,417
    Gifts Beer Balloons Gift Car Beer

    Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Register to remove this ad.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pahu View Post
    The evidence is factual and up to date.
    I am afraid that you have no idea what you are talking about.
    You probably never read anything other than the quotes offered up on Mr Brown's web pages.

    Two of the articles quoted in your post actually prove the opposite of the assertion in your post. You would easily realize that were you to bother to read those articles.
    "The trouble with people isn't that they don't know, but that they know so much that ain't so."
    - Anonymous

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Evolution
    By spot in forum Science
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-11-2008, 05:12 PM
  2. Normal Science is Lamp-Post Science
    By coberst in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 01:43 PM
  3. Evolution
    By SnoozeControl in forum People
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 03:48 PM
  4. Evolution
    By SnoozeControl in forum Just For The Fun Of It
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-26-2006, 09:39 PM
  5. Did you know that evolution....
    By metalstorm in forum Did You Know?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-28-2004, 06:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2