Whoooa what is wrong with this picture?

[commie_kalafornian]

http://www.outdoors.net/site/images/...+curpage+10663

That is anti-gun Senator from New York having a good time with a gun???

Is this gun illegal? If so where and why was he firing it? If it's not illegal, so what?

[commie_kalafornian]

Originally Posted by flopstock

Is this gun illegal? If so where and why was he firing it? If it's not illegal, so what?

Here is the big deal. This is his record and opinions on guns:

http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/searc...ds=gun+control


If he is in New York yes the gun is illegal. Unless he has a permit. Of couse that would not be so, Charles Schumer is an anti-gun Senator. Now that would not be right wouldn't it? An anti-gun senator with a gun permit? You should ask Charles Shumer himself why he is shooting a gun and having a good time. I can not understand it myself.

Originally Posted by commie_kalafornian

Here is the big deal. This is his record and opinions on guns:

http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/searc...ds=gun+control


If he is in New York yes the gun is illegal. Unless he has a permit. Of couse that would not be so, Charles Schumer is an anti-gun Senator. Now that would not be right wouldn't it? An anti-gun senator with a gun permit? You should ask Charles Shumer himself why he is shooting a gun and having a good time. I can not understand it myself.

So you can't or won't say where he was and what the purpose of the pic was. And you don't know if he has a permit. I guess i don't have a problem with him or anyone else for that matter having a good time doing something that is legal. But if you don't know any particulars about the photo, how do you even know that he is having a good time? The photographer may have simply captured his face 'mid grimace'.

i think my problem with both sides of this 'type' of issue is this apparent need for 1upsmanship. If you want to argue the issue fine, but this 'your mama' crap both sides pull is really beneath all of you.

He could be on a military range testing the gun for that matter. Or a police range doing research?

That does not look like hes enjoying it to me, it looks like concentration and fear of firing the weapon.

[commie_kalafornian]

Originally Posted by flopstock

So you can't or won't say where he was and what the purpose of the pic was. And you don't know if he has a permit. I guess i don't have a problem with him or anyone else for that matter having a good time doing something that is legal. But if you don't know any particulars about the photo, how do you even know that he is having a good time? The photographer may have simply captured his face 'mid grimace'.

i think my problem with both sides of this 'type' of issue is this apparent need for 1upsmanship. If you want to argue the issue fine, but this 'your mama' crap both sides pull is really beneath all of you.

First off, what the heck is he even doing with a gun? Does he have a permit? An anti-gun senator with a permit is that possible? Why would an anti-gun senator have a permit?

The point? He is a gun hypocrite. No I don't think that is a grimace? Noticed the relaxed arms. When I shoot a BIG handgun with lots of recoil, I grimace too, but my arms are NOT floppy like that.

You're asking the same questions I asked you to answer for me! You still haven't!

You tell me the context of that picture. And I notice that this is 2001 also..what's up with that?

[commie_kalafornian]

Originally Posted by flopstock

You're asking the same questions I asked you to answer for me! You still haven't!

You tell me the context of that picture. And I notice that this is 2001 also..what's up with that?

Let me answer your question with a question:

Do you think he has a permit?

[abbey]

Who Cares!!

Originally Posted by abbey

Who Cares!!

hahaha Abbey!


You know just what to say!