ForumGarden

it seems like there are more fedral cuts for the disabled now which is not fair at all.

i have to say that it's garbage altogether

but the government has to make their money some how :-5

Since when does a reduction in the growth rate of a federal program constitute a cut? The program still gets more money than the previous year, just not as large of an increase as some had hoped. Instead of a program growing at 6% annually, it might grow at a 3% rate. That is a cut?

BLUEDEVIL1 wrote: Since when does a reduction in the growth rate of a federal program constitute a cut? The program still gets more money than the previous year, just not as large of an increase as some had hoped. Instead of a program growing at 6% annually, it might grow at a 3% rate. That is a cut?


SHHHHHHHH BLUE.................



If a lib spends more but gets less than was proposed in the prior year it is a cut.................



Got it?.......... SPEND MORE=CUT.........

Now pipe down son

thomas40 wrote: it seems like there are more fedral cuts for the disabled now which is not fair at all.
What cuts?



Should the fed gov't be tasked with caring for the diabled??