<t>Accountable wrote: So a kingdom (which still exist in the world, btw) has less right to choose their method of self-defense than a democracy? I'm just trying to understand your heirarchy.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
My ideal heirachy would be something like this....in order of preference.......<br/>
<br ...

<t>I agree that nukes are a bit......whats the phrase I would use ?.................................<br/>
<br/>
Over the top as a response ?.....well to anything really !<br/>
<br/>
But they are at the very least awesome to look at !;) <br/>
<br/>
They served their purpose well during the cold war ...

Thank you everyone, its good to be here.

I don't mind being called bhead, I've been called a lot worse than that believe me !

<t>I don't believe the american administration were complicit in 9/11, I don't think they have the nerve, the means or the brains to orchestrate something of that magnitude (theorists everywhere start to shake their heads and tut tut to themselves !)<br/>
<br/>
If the Bush administration wanted to ...

<t>seekerw wrote: I agree with most of what you say. However, I think that every responsible nation ought to have nuclear weapons, meaning those who'd never use them except in self defense.<br/>
<br/>
I think it's crucial that Israel have them. That, IMO, is the only thing preventing the Arab ...

<r>Hello there,<br/>
<br/>
I am brazenhead, a brazenhead was the name of a clay effigy of a human head fashioned out of mud from unconsecrated ground by the famous occultist Roger Bacon in the 16th century.<br/>
<br/>
The effigy was asked three questions and replied as follows "Time is, time was ...