ForumGarden

Pahu

<t> Genetic Information 1 Information never self-assembles. The genetic information in the DNA of each human cell is roughly equivalent to a library of 4,000 books (a). a. Carl Sagan showed, using straight-forward calculations, why one cellâ€™s worth of g...

Pahu

<t> Genetic Distances 3 Humans vs. Chimpanzees. Evolutionists say that the chimpanzee is the closest living relative to humans. For two decades (1984â€“2004), evolutionists and the media claimed that human DNA is about 99% similar to chimpanzee DNA. These statements...

Pahu

<r>Big Bang ? References a . â€œObservations only recently made possible by improvements in astronomical instrumentation have put theoretical models of the Universe under intense pressure. The standard ideas of the 1980s about the shape and history of the Universe have now been...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518646 wrote: I never said the Universe did come from nothing. That is something no-one knows for certain. You, on the other hand, clearly know better than any of the world's leading scientists, as you appear to have all the answers. The answer, of course, being "Magic". The ...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518630 wrote: Your perpetual resort to saying that something is Supernatural & claiming that 'Proves' something is just mind blowing in its stupidity. It's a playground argument of "Why? Because I said so!" It has no validity whatsoever, and you claim this to be a Scientific approac...

Pahu

<t> Genetic Distances 2 DNA and RNA. Comparisons can be made between the genetic material of different organisms. The list of organisms that have had all their genes sequenced and entered in databases, such as â€œGenBank,â€ is doubling each year. Computer compariso...

Pahu

<t>[QUOTE=FourPart;1518551]My post referred to how Evolution relies on Evidence. You replied "That is how Evolution works" I was commenting on the rest of your statement that: "As with all Science, the evidence comes FIRST. With Creationism the notion comes first then you desperately try ...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518540 wrote: At least you acknowledge that Evolution is based on Evidence, which is the point I was making. Creationism has no Scientific background whatsoever. Everything is based on the premise of the existence of a God. There is no evidence for this whatsoever, therefore ...

Pahu

<t> Genetic Distances 1 Similarities between different forms of life can now be measured. Proteins. â€œGenetic distancesâ€ can be calculated by taking a specific protein and examining the sequence of its components. The fewer changes needed to convert a ...

Pahu

<r>FourPart;1518473 wrote: Now compare that twaddle with the ACTUAL data... They ran 6 different age test on it & only 1 differed from the others - with that one indicating quite a bit older. As for Helium Leakage - that is known to be higher when heat is applied, as oppose...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1518470 wrote: More young earther-techie babble. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: A Tale of Two Hourglasses BY D. RUSSELL HUMPHREYS, PH.D. In your kitchen you start a three-m...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1518466 wrote: Despite the hype from your lot, there is nothing scientific about "Creationism" Wrong! The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Zircon: Earth's Oldest Crystal? by Vernon R. Cupps,...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518463 wrote: The Court's official ruling was that Creationism is Religious in nature & NOT Science. Plain & simple. His assertions have no Scientific backing & cannot, therefore be classed as Scientific, as Science demands that the backing comes first. He could n...

Pahu

<r>FourPart;1518429 wrote: I presume that is the same Behe who was debunked in the Dover Court where it was officially determined that Intelligent Design is NOT Science, but Religious in nature. <URL url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Be...

Pahu

<t> Barriers, Buffers, and Chemical Pathways Living cells contain thousands of different chemicals, some acidic, others basic. Many chemicals would react with others were it not for an intricate system of chemical barriers and buffers. If living things evolved, thes...

Pahu

<t> The First Cell 2 There is no evidence that any stable states exist between the assumed formation of proteins and the formation of the first living cells. No scientist has ever demonstrated that this fantastic jump in complexity could have happenedâ€”even if the ...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518273 wrote: Yawn - Same old, same old. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Stone Blades Cut Back Evolutionary Dates BY BRIAN THOMAS, M.S. Evolutionary anthropologists once t...

Pahu

<t>The 'Animal Connection' Points to Creation, not Evolution [continued] However, the available data regarding language, animal domestication, and early artwork are most easily interpreted within a creation, not an evolution, narrative. If the first man was created i...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518250 wrote: Deja vu all over again. There is, of course that Time & Space are folding in a multi dimensional mobious loop. Pahu's repeating postings seem to support this theory. He puts the same old pastings with no additional input, using the same old phrase that demon...

Pahu

<t>Entropy and Open Systems [continued] If either the information program or the converter mechanism is not available to that "open" system, it will not increase in order, no matter how much external energy surrounds it. The system will proceed to decay in accordance with...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1518138 wrote: In Physics, a Law is just that - it cannot be expressed in different way. It cannot be Cherry Picked. It is what it is. As for disorder never tending towards order, then explain crystals. Explain a snowflake. The are extremely mathematically precise examples of...

Pahu

<r>FourPart;1518117 wrote: First of all you are strting with a False Premise - or more to the point & Unknown Premise by simply using the words "Since it did have a beginning". You have already acknowledged that are various theories on that topic, and that none are known for certain, yet you beg...

Pahu

<r>FourPart;1518045 wrote: Theresa May has the same sort of policy. Repeated soundbites, like "Strong & Stable" - "More Good & Outstanding Schools" (ignoring the record number of Failing ones), Donald Trump - "Stable Genius", "Guns are Good", etc. Repeating it does NOT make it so. It just ma...

Pahu

<t> Proteins 3 Furthermore, the proposed energy sources for forming proteins (earthâ€™s heat, electrical discharges, or solar radiation) destroy the protein products thousands of times faster than they could have formed (f). The many attempts to show how life might ...

Pahu

<t>Ted;1518040 wrote: I certainly have never seen any science on Pahu's part in this thread. Nice and interesting fantasy though. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Did Panda Bears Once Live in Europe? <br...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517990 wrote: Well, Sir, anyone who buys into your ridiculous nonsense is dense, indeed. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Seal Whiskers Track Fish Trails BY BRIAN THOMAS, M.S. <br/...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517986 wrote: Thou repeatest thyself. Redundantly. And, yet, no science. Repetion is sometimes necessary for those too dense to comprehend. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: FOSSILS AND STRATA...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517981 wrote: "Creation Science Facts" ??? Talk about circular dis-logic, and oxymoron. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: FOSSILS AND STRATA: 2 In this article we will focus our att...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517971 wrote: Because that is what you seem to think they are. And you missed the part where I called them "your interesting science facts" The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: FOSSILS AND STRATA: 1 Here you...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517962 wrote: Um, a "fact" is not science A fact is basically a point of data. You can have a whole boatload of facts, and still not have any science. As exhibited by your collection of posts to this thread. Then why did you ...

Pahu

<t> Proteins 2 To form proteins, amino acids must also be highly concentrated in an extremely pure liquid (c). However, the early oceans or ponds would have been far from pure and would have diluted amino acids, so the required collisions between amino acids would r...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517952 wrote: No, it is not I being blind, Brother. I see, and read all of your interesting science facts buried in some very nice articles about various critters, but there is very little actual science, and once the narrator takes off on his philosophical tangents, all the ...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517947 wrote: The phrase â€œrelatively simpleâ€ is awash with subjective interpretations. Subjective interpretation pretty much defines your whole collection of posts. Again, where is the science? You now, after a couple of years of posting mostly subj...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517944 wrote: You did not just post that. I refuse to believe that you can be as ignorant as that sounds. Because you are unable or unwilling to grasp the facts, you lash out with pathetic attacks. I can only advise you to try thinking. The disciplines of scie...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517940 wrote: I don't reject, I simple don't see the causal chain that the author claims. If you see a person in New York wearing a Silk shirt, would you assume that he is from China? There are many other probable, yet untested possibilities to explore before draw...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517929 wrote: The logic here is... , well, ... Illogical Not at all. Much evidence supports Earth as the origin of meteorites. Where is the illogic in that? Especially after seeing that evidence, which you apparently choose to reject, probably because it doesn't conform ...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517925 wrote: I just have to drop this here. Ingredients for life found in meteors Two wayward space rocks, which separately crashed to Earth in 1998 after circulating in our solar system's asteroid belt for billions of years, share something else in common: the in...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517899 wrote: You keep saying that, but reading through this thread, it seems to be you who is Evidence free, and biased. All I have ever said, really, is show me the Science. All you have done is prattle on with opinions. The disciplines of scienc...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517885 wrote: Oh ,no. A lot of this is quite fascinating. I just don't see the part that supposedly debunks Evolutionary thinking. Nor do I see where it proves any Creation thought. It, indeed, show how marvelous our world can be in all its scientific glory. ...

Pahu

<t>Ted;1517876 wrote: What a load of BS. Trying to live in the ancient past. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: 'Talking' Ants Are Evidence for Creation BY JEFFREY P. TOMKINS, PH.D. ...

Pahu

<t> Proteins 1 Living matter is composed largely of proteins, which are long chains of amino acids. Since 1930, it has been known that amino acids cannot link together if oxygen is present. That is, proteins could not have evolved from chance chemical reactions if t...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517844 wrote: You guys make Flat-Earthers seem intelligent. The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Coelacanths: Evolutionists Still Fishing in Shallow Water by Tim Clarey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey ...

Pahu

<t>[QUOTE=Pahu;1517841]How Do Mother Butterflies Avoid the Poison? [continued] The study authors similarly wrote, "All of these insect host-plant interactions are mediated primarily by adult female butterflies, which must correctly identify suitable host plant...

Pahu

<t>How Do Mother Butterflies Avoid the Poison? [continued] Heliconius mothers come fully equipped. They have wings and eyes for travel, dual-purpose landing-gear legs with taste sensors, internal egg-manufacturing facilities, and the appropriate insight to sel...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517839 wrote: So, I see that you have shifted your focus. That is not a bad thing, entirely. But you keep saying, "The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. " Nothing you have posted supports that statement. Eve...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517835 wrote: Agin, A very interesting article. Quite fascinating. But, again, how is this actually science that "disproves" anything? I am sure, with your superior intelligence, you can figure it out, unless your pro-evolution bias blinds you. The...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517818 wrote: I discern that you have a complete lack of understanding of what constitutes "Science" The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example: Comb Jelly Genome Gums Up Evolution BY JEFFREY P. T...

Pahu

<t>Jesus Lizard Runs on Water, Tramples Evolution [continued] Again, this absence of evolution does not disprove the whole caboodle, but it does cast a vote in favor of the idea that God created this creature in the beginning to reproduce according to its kind. ...

Pahu

<t>LarsMac;1517814 wrote: I am sure that scientific facts don't bother FourPart. They don't bother me, either. It is the lack of scientific facts in your posts that we find silly. Which only reveals your lack of discernment. The disciplines of science prove cr...

Pahu

<t>FourPart;1517810 wrote: Just as I said - you cannot quantify your claims & once again have to rely on pasting irrelevant material. You really should get some professional help to get over your pasting fetish. I am sorry scientific facts bother you. The disciplines of science ...

Search found 1799 matches