Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies at 87

[LarsMac]

I expect there will be three new appointees by next summer, taking the total of Supreme Court Justices to twelve. It's a minor matter but it does rebalance the current bias.

Current bias?

You want Trump to appoint three more jurors?

I cannot see the point of increasing the number of members in the SC.

[spot]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

[LarsMac]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

It is the Senate that has been gamed.
Fix that, and the SC will be fine.

[tude dog]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

It is the Senate that has been gamed.
Fix that, and the SC will be fine.

I don't understand how the Senate can be gamed or of any problem with the SC.

[LarsMac]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

It is the Senate that has been gamed.
Fix that, and the SC will be fine.

I don't understand how the Senate can be gamed or of any problem with the SC.

It's all about the 2-party system. Think on it a while. It will come to you. Imagine being at a poker game with only two players.
You DO play Poker, right?

[tude dog]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

It is the Senate that has been gamed.
Fix that, and the SC will be fine.

I don't understand how the Senate can be gamed or of any problem with the SC.

It's all about the 2-party system. Think on it a while. It will come to you. Imagine being at a poker game with only two players.
You DO play Poker, right?

Actually, I do not play poker and rarely played any game of chance. Mostly because I am not all that interested in paying the cost to learn how to play well and still lose money.

I think I know what you are trying to say.

[LarsMac]

You appear to be stuck with a constitution which has been gamed. I doubt it's the first time.

It is the Senate that has been gamed.
Fix that, and the SC will be fine.

I don't understand how the Senate can be gamed or of any problem with the SC.

It's all about the 2-party system. Think on it a while. It will come to you. Imagine being at a poker game with only two players.
You DO play Poker, right?

Actually, I do not play poker and rarely played any game of chance. Mostly because I am not all that interested in paying the cost to learn how to play well and still lose money.

I think I know what you are trying to say.

A wise man.
Congress is like two guys playing high stakes Poker. The problem is they are always playing with other peoples' money. They seldom actually have "Skin in the Game"

[spot]

US Democrat Jim Clyburn says expand Supreme Court

One of the most senior Democrats in Congress, House majority whip Jim Clyburn has said he is in favour of increasing the size of the Supreme Court from its current level of nine judges, but further research was needed on the appropriate number.

Mr Clyburn told Hardtalk's Stephen Sackur that Supreme Court had not always had nine members.

"Why did we go to nine? So the question is do we need to go to 11, 12, 13? I think a baker's dozen might be a good number," he said.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has refused to make clear whether he supports expanding the number of justices, and recently said he would appoint a bipartisan commission to study whether a review of the judiciary was needed if he wins the White House.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-54733589

[tude dog]

US Democrat Jim Clyburn says expand Supreme Court

One of the most senior Democrats in Congress, House majority whip Jim Clyburn has said he is in favour of increasing the size of the Supreme Court from its current level of nine judges, but further research was needed on the appropriate number.

Mr Clyburn told Hardtalk's Stephen Sackur that Supreme Court had not always had nine members.

"Why did we go to nine? So the question is do we need to go to 11, 12, 13? I think a baker's dozen might be a good number," he said.

History of the Supreme Court; https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/institution.aspx

Why nine for the last 120 years now needs examination.?

The answer is simple in that they lost an election and now are not happy.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has refused to make clear whether he supports expanding the number of justices, and recently said he would appoint a bipartisan commission to study whether a review of the judiciary was needed if he wins the White House.

Sleepy is running away.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-54733589

[spot]

The answer is simple in that they lost an election and now are not happy.

They did?

When did they?

[tude dog]

The answer is simple in that they lost an election and now are not happy.

They did?

When did they?

2019 when Trump was elected President.

[spot]

The answer is simple in that they lost an election and now are not happy.

They did?

When did they?

2019 when Trump was elected President.

I'm sure you think that's funny, but I don't know why.