ForumGarden

I wonder how many women and girls are composing fan/love letters to him right now.

SnoozeAgain;1425101 wrote: I wonder how many women and girls are composing fan/love letters to him right now.


me too.:yh_sigh

I saw a Doc one night about the serial killer Richard Ramirez. Not only did he have the women writing to him and wanting to marry him, they actually allowed some of these fans Into the court room for his trial. He spent most of that time winking at them and blowing kisses. Revolting!!!

Ahso!;1424597 wrote: I don't understand this post. I never said anyone deserved to be treated violently. Instead, what I wrote was that unless we as a nation commit to changing our treatment of other nations (i.e. invading other countries militarily and/or commercially), I fear this sort of thing might continue to befall us.


What I was getting at is that there will be violent people no matter how we act. Forever. It's not OUR fault in any way. It's the fault of the violent ones themselves. That's why I refuse to "get used to it."

My theory is that the older brother was the extremist and he carried his little brother along for the ride. Doesn't make the little brother less guilty, however.

SnoozeAgain;1425101 wrote: I wonder how many women and girls are composing fan/love letters to him right now.


Boston Bombing Suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- Heartthrob to the Misguided | TMZ.com

tabby;1426895 wrote: Boston Bombing Suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- Heartthrob to the Misguided | TMZ.comFunny that that happens. Anyone have an inkling as to why?

Ahso!;1426898 wrote: Funny that that happens. Anyone have an inkling as to why?


Yeah. Because he's real cute & teenagers are horny & they don't really understand sexual feelings yet.

oscar;1424991 wrote:

There was every chance he could have another bomb with him or open fire on more Innocents. The entire city was In lock down for hours. The relief when he was caught must have been euphoric. A serious threat to life was In custody.

....


Funny. He was framed. There is a big difference between "armed" or "not armed". It's not hard to tell the difference. Yet it took five days to correct. Is it strange?

Now officials claim Boston bombing suspect was NOT armed in boat showdown - despite police account of firefight and him 'shooting himself'

Officials now claim that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed as he hid in boat in Watertown

Contradicts Boston Police Commissioner's account of hour-long firefight with Tsarnaev

New York Times said M4 rifle had been found on boat

Police sources suggested Tsarnaev shot himself onboard

By Associated Press and Daily Mail Reporter



PUBLISHED:20:53 EST, 24 April 2013

Read more: Now officials claim Boston bombing suspect was NOT armed in boat showdown - despite police account of firefight and him 'shooting himself' | Mail Online

Boy ran away with torn clothes.

--------------



AWARD-WINNING PHOTO: Man with torn cloths, but no sign of any cuts or wounds. Is this really possible?

--------------

This video may tell you how they could show you with torn clothes.

Crisis Actor Caught During Explosion - Boston Bombing - YouTube

Crisis Actor Caught During Explosion - Boston Bombing - YouTube

Another cover up team? 1. A man gets up, pulls at / rips his shorts, then sits down again. What is his story?

2. The woman in black appears to take a photo of Bauman, then put her camera away, then start helping people. That seems odd to me.

You usually need a reason for a whole group of people to set up a fake catastrophe. What's the motive? What are the ends?

Are you saying all those people in the video are actors, or that one actor wearing torn clothing got in a whole crowd of unsuspecting people, waited for a bomb to go off (or was that fake, too?) and then got up and walked away?

That second photo of the guy staggering with torn cloths is a victim of the blasts concussion, it is a common effect when in close proximity to an explosion. There are numerous instances of soldiers having been blown out of their clothes in high explosive blasts. The man is very lucky, he probably has severe bruising and possibly burns not to mention destroyed ear drums. All too often blast injuries are internal as the concussion tosses your internal organs around. Much like an auto accident.

Scrat;1428685 wrote: That second photo of the guy staggering with torn cloths is a victim of the blasts concussion, it is a common effect when in close proximity to an explosion. There are numerous instances of soldiers having been blown out of their clothes in high explosive blasts. The man is very lucky, he probably has severe bruising and possibly burns not to mention destroyed ear drums. All too often blast injuries are internal as the concussion tosses your internal organs around. Much like an auto accident.


Yeah, and he probably had hair before the blast, too.

Scrat;1428685 wrote: That second photo of the guy staggering with torn cloths is a victim of the blasts concussion, it is a common effect when in close proximity to an explosion. There are numerous instances of soldiers having been blown out of their clothes in high explosive blasts. The man is very lucky, he probably has severe bruising and possibly burns not to mention destroyed ear drums. All too often blast injuries are internal as the concussion tosses your internal organs around. Much like an auto accident.


Magic bomb had different function on people. If it “hurts” victim’s body, however severe it was, it saves their clothes. But if it torn the clothes, then it won’t touch your body, even without a scratch. Do you know why?



Sydney Corcoran severely hurt by a sharpnel but blowing wave bypassed her.

http://www.kaotic.com/media/pictures/f8 ... 56ee65.jpg

Bauman lost his legs. (of course with his pants, otherwise it won't make sense) but his upper clothes remain untouched.

Different teams had different missions. Some show their torn clothes. Some spread blood. All have to be done in a short movement. So you see a magic bomb fundtion.

OH, just shut UP.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

It is not at all unusual to see stuff like that in a blasts.

LarsMac;1429975 wrote: OH, just shut UP.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

It is not at all unusual to see stuff like that in a blasts.He's just a traveling troll. Apparently we're just a stop on his route. Notice that he doesn't answer my questions in post #111 because that would ruin his show.

Accountable;1429978 wrote: He's just a traveling troll. Apparently we're just a stop on his route. Notice that he doesn't answer my questions in post #111 because that would ruin his show.


There is that.

He and the truth guy (maybe one in the samE?) seem to gather up all the wingnut stuff in various forums and just spread it around.

Kinda remind my of the way my grandson decorated the the barn when he decided to help muck out the horse stalls.

Where the blood came from. Bleeding lady.

But why?

When the bomb exploded, there was a sound so loud that a lot of people covered up their ears with hands. The sound source was from mid-way of the building. you can see from some people's sight. But was it possible the bomber throwing a backpack(with pressure pot inside) into the air? Or from the midway of the building? I don't agree with this explanation. I think it was a sound produced by another party to distract public's attention so actor teams could do their job without being watched.

, “Smith then offers up the theory that the explosion was in what he assumes to be a hotel, and that it could possibly have been the result of a gas leak in the kitchen. His confusion is entirely understandable given that there was a noticeable lack of any indication that there had been an explosion out on the pavement, including a serious shortage of visible victims. Smith then listens in as local Fox reporter Maria Stephanos talks with the anchor for the local Fox affiliate, who is identified only as Mike. Stephanos quickly dismisses the second blast as insignificant. She then goes on to say that the first blast did not occur at ground level, but rather midway up the building. Mike interjects, “So, Maria, again just to make this point, since you were right there, you’re saying from what you could see, it didn’t seem like the explosion happened on the ground but actually happened in the building?” To which Maria quickly responds, “Exactly, Mike, in the middle of a building. I was right there. I turned around and you saw the plume of smoke in the middle of the building.”



(Youtube disabled)

Did you notice that pretty much all the people along the fence line who aren’t running away, beginning with the bald guy with sunglasses and continuing down to the guy in the red jacket and blue cap, are all looking in the same direction? And it’s not at the ground, where the bomb supposedly detonated and where all the alleged victims are laid out. No, they are all looking at a spot about midway up the building, above where all the fake victims are sprawled out. That’s a pretty strange coincidence, isn’t it?

So the bomb went off midway up the building, but it blew off everyone’s legs?! That doesn’t sound quite right. What does sound entirely plausible though is that a smoke bomb was detonated over the heads of the crowd, providing cover for the actors, in full wardrobe and make-up, to swiftly emerge from Lenscrafters to take up their positions on the pavement. And if that sounds crazy to you, blame Fox News. They’re the ones who reported it.

Special Report on the Boston Marathon: The Curious Case of the Man Who Could Only Sit Down, Part 5

If you think Jeff Bauman and others were performing a stage show at finish line, then it was an organized crime done by the Feds. No others has such an ability to do that. A well organized operation would also set up a field office at finish line to monitor and command the bombing show. That field office likely was in the building to the bombing site where a distract sound was produced to turn away people's attention.

The following pictures also indicate that office had issued instruction to particular force at particular time.



police look up



undercover look up



Carlos looks up

Source : Special Report on the Boston Marathon: The Curious Case of the Man Who Could Only Sit Down, Part 5

Keep people away from the criminal site. Only the Feds could take photo information.

They control the security, drove people – potential witnesses away. So their actors could perform without being watched.



100% PROOF THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING WAS REAL! A MUST WATCH! 2nd explosion raw video, EXTREMELY GR - YouTube

go that way.

Boston Marathon Bomb Chaos Captured via Mobile - YouTube

Boston Marathon Bomb Chaos Captured via Mobile - YouTube

turn to the right

Very Few Injured at Boston Marathon Blast 2013 - YouTube

Very Few Injured at Boston Marathon Blast 2013 - YouTube

Originally Posted by goodomens97

This is a video I hadn't seen before, and it comes in from an angle starting from the corner of the first site, walking toward the actual "blast" site. It's very shaky and not very long, but if you watch it frame by frame, there's some interesting stuff happening from 0:29-0:32--some guys near the building hastily loading something purple into a black bag. The thing that really caught my attention, though, was the very end. When someone on the set noticed the person filming, he violently screams at him to "GET OUT OF HERE!"

http://letsrollforums.com/looking-acros ... 641p3.html

Nicole Brannock Gross, Victim In Boston Marathon Bombing Photo, Gives CBS Interview With Family

: 05/30/2013

The photograph of Gross, seen around the world, became an instant symbol of the attack. After suffering two breaks in her left leg and an injury to her Achilles tendon, the Boston Globe reported that Gross has been re-learning how to walk.

Nicole Brannock Gross, Victim In Boston Marathon Bombing Photo, Gives CBS Interview With Family


There are doctor’s appointments and physical therapy sessions for Nicole, who suffered two broken bones in her left leg, a nearly severed Achilles tendon in her right

Community support fueling Nicole Gross’s recovery | CharlotteObserver.com

-------------------------



Nicole Gross’ original location, she is on dark red bricks.



Second location she moved to – two bricks away from blood stain.



Third location - Now she is on blood stain once her left foot was on. This photo has been described as "iconic" by some in the media, it graced the front pages of many papers the day following the bombing. Her name is Nicole Gross and she is reported to have two broken legs, or a broken leg and a broken ankle, depending on the source, yet she is sitting upright in a position that puts strain on the legs and shows no sign of pain nor does she grab at her injured legs. I have highlighted one square to demonstrate that she can even shift about with two broken legs and maintain the same stressful sitting position.

Although the pictures hint she hadn't moved because she showed with same sitting style, she actually moved at least twice, with two broken bones? There were many pictures and videos. None shows how she moves. What they show you were screened ones they thought with no flaw.

Source: http://anywho.simplesite.com/201858947

Enough of this crap.

LarsMac;1434286 wrote: Enough of this crap.


Agree entirely

It's astonishing what the human body is capable of when overdosed with adrenalin during a serious "fight or flight" situation such as this. And that includes walking with broken legs. It's remarkably common during warfare.

I think Katnip has stunk this place up long enough

I have to agree with Katsung. And I'm suspicious of anyone who does not allow people to say what they think or indeed tell what they have found out . I remember watching it live and things didn't add up way back then when we're all suposed to be in a state of shock and awe.

And dont' forget the 'wittness' they interviewed who then some how showed up a the primary school shooting as a wittness (a friend of the shooters mother) weirdly couldn't give any friendship details of the woman though .

fuzzywuzzy;1434629 wrote: I have to agree with Katsung. And I'm suspicious of anyone who does not allow people to say what they think or indeed tell what they have found out . I remember watching it live and things didn't add up way back then when we're all suposed to be in a state of shock and awe.

And dont' forget the 'wittness' they interviewed who then some how showed up a the primary school shooting as a wittness (a friend of the shooters mother) weirdly couldn't give any friendship details of the woman though .


Umm, that was balony. A TV station simply mishandled their picture library and posted the wrong picture during the report on Boston. All the conspiracy nutjobs took it and ran with it. and obviously from your post, by the time the story got to your side of the planet it was even more screwed up.

fuzzywuzzy;1434629 wrote: I have to agree with Katsung. And I'm suspicious of anyone who does not allow people to say what they think or indeed tell what they have found out . I remember watching it live and things didn't add up way back then when we're all suposed to be in a state of shock and awe.

And dont' forget the 'wittness' they interviewed who then some how showed up a the primary school shooting as a wittness (a friend of the shooters mother) weirdly couldn't give any friendship details of the woman though .


That one's easy - lots of people will say anything to get their mug on TV, even claiming friendship with someone they've never even met.

LarsMac;1434647 wrote: Umm, that was balony. A TV station simply mishandled their picture library and posted the wrong picture during the report on Boston. All the conspiracy nutjobs took it and ran with it. and obviously from your post, by the time the story got to your side of the planet it was even more screwed up.


Yes Lars we're very backwards in this country we don't get live television.:rolleyes:

"conspiricy nutjobs" ???? Well denial is not just a river in Egypt is it? Have fun in Syria

Bryn Mawr;1434742 wrote: That one's easy - lots of people will say anything to get their mug on TV, even claiming friendship with someone they've never even met.


They named her She's an Israeli reporter.

LarsMac;1434286 wrote: Enough of this crap.


I don't believe the theories of alien and UFO. However I never go into their discussion to shout "Enough of this crap". Because I also believe everybody has a basic right to speak out his own opinion. If you don't agree with me please join discussion or debate instead of shout abusing. No one has forced you to read this thread.



The picture shows her left leg was broken. (at right bottom)



. Her left foot is in an unnatural style . I tried myself and found it is an impossible style unless her leg was broken. (Try it by yourself)



Campbell on stretcher. Her left leg remains complete. It’s a conflict to other pictures.

Krystle Campbell, You can see one of her foot in blue color shoe is under the fence. (left bottom)



Carlos brings down the fence. Did he follow an order to do so? He should know there are people under the fence.

katsung47;1435502 wrote: I don't believe the theories of alien and UFO. However I never go into their discussion to shout "Enough of this crap". Because I also believe everybody has a basic right to speak out his own opinion. If you don't agree with me please join discussion or debate instead of shout abusing. No one has forced you to read this thread.




This is not about agreeing, or disagreeing with you.

This is about you continuously posting photos that many find offensive, and which may even be in violation of copyright laws.

You also seem to be accusing the victim of this event of play-acting is some trumped up conspiracy. They could take offense to this kind of thing and seek legal action against the owners of this forum.



I say, again, "Enough of this crap!"

Those feel offensive, most likely, are the real perpetrators of Boston bombing. You have nothing to debate on what I have said but the fallacy. Do you feel offensive with 911 truthers? There are so many of them.

The real offensive one, is the WMD which your master has used to activate the war in Iraq which killed so many people. Dare you speak out on that? It's your master.

katsung47;1436270 wrote: Those feel offensive, most likely, are the real perpetrators of Boston bombing. You have nothing to debate on what I have said but the fallacy. Do you feel offensive with 911 truthers? There are so many of them.

The real offensive one, is the WMD which your master has used to activate the war in Iraq which killed so many people. Dare you speak out on that? It's your master.


The thing that offends from your type on that field of study is how you immediately try to drag the whole conspiracy "Truth" out and lump it into one big hairball, whenever anyone doubts a single point.

Been there, done that. Thanks for playing.

Back to Boston. The "real perpetrators" have been dealt with. They were some misguided young men.

You tromp on the graves of the victims with your so-called "truth"

Back to Boston. The "real perpetrators" have been dealt with. They were some misguided young men.


Misguided by whom? Your master?

Only 1% of So Called Terrorists Nabbed by the FBI Were Real

A larger number of arrestees, poor and powerless, were caught in FBI "Threat Factory" stings.

July 8, 2013

Trevor Aaronson: I’d say that the majority of the foiled attacks that they cite are really only foiled attacks because the FBI made the attack possible, and most of the people who are caught in these so-called foiled attacks are caught through sting operations that use either an undercover FBI agent or informant posing as some sort of Al-Qaeda operative.

In all of these cases, the defendants, or the would-be terrorists, are people who at best have a vague idea that they want to commit some sort of violent act or some sort of act of terrorism but have no means on their own. They don’t have weapons. They don’t have connections with any international terrorist groups.

In many cases they’re mentally ill or they’re economically desperate. An undercover informant or agent posing as an Al-Qaeda operative gives them everything they need¦ gives them the transportation, gives them the money if they need it, and then gives them the bomb and even the idea for the terrorist attack. And then when that person pushes a button to detonate the bomb that they believe will explode—a bomb that was provided to them in whole by the FBI—agents rush in, arrest them and charge them with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and then parade that person out to the public saying, "Look at us. We caught a terrorist. This is us keeping you safe."

If you look at the record of prosecutions in the decade after 911, there has yet to be a case of some Al-Qaeda operative providing the means for a wannabe terrorist to do an act of terrorism. It’s only the FBI that’s providing the means through these sting operations. What this has done is really inflate the threat of terrorism within the United States—particularly from Muslim terrorists—because in almost all of these cases sting operations target men on the fringes of Muslim communities who might be mentally ill, economically desperate or otherwise very easily manipulated by an informant who can make a lot of money in these sting operations.

Shocker: Only 1% of So Called Terrorists Nabbed by the FBI Were Real | Alternet

Back to Boston. The "real perpetrators" have been dealt with. They were some misguided young men.


Misguided by whom? Your master?



The Truthseeker: Boston Bombing - What You Aren't Told (E14) - YouTube

The Truthseeker: Boston Bombing - What You Aren't Told (E14) - YouTube

Horse hockey

LarsMac;1436885 wrote: Horse hockey


Is that polo?

AnneBoleyn;1436903 wrote: Is that polo?


No, I think it smells better.

http://d2yq0g4vt6ipuo.cloudfront.net/94 ... h2600_.jpg

Man by the side of Bauman, not set a sight on him. Does Bauman exist?

http://letsrollforums.com/imagehosting/ ... c81e0b.jpg

Nobody takes care of Bauman. He seems not exist there.

http://d2yq0g4vt6ipuo.cloudfront.net/ad ... h2600_.jpg

Woman crying, didn’t watch Bauman. (Campbell foot under fence)

http://d2vqx76lplv3ab.cloudfront.net/1b ... h2600_.jpg

Man watches somewhere else. Does Bauman exist? (check pulse)

http://wideshut.co.uk/wp-content/upload ... dondo2.jpg

A man walks by, (Carlos on fence)

So many people passed by. Nobody sets sight on Bauman when they pass there. It means Bauman was not there.

URGENT!!! MUST SEE!!! MOST DISTURBING VID on UT!! THE "CURTAIN"FALLS...WE SEE THE "WIZARD".!!!. - YouTube

How could they show you the pictures like that? Watch the last three minutes of the video. I think that’s how they put Jeff Bauman into the picture. Since it was a doctored picture. Nobody watch at Bauman because he was not there at the scene.