Page 2 of 2
Can VS USA
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:11 am
by downag
spot wrote: Downag you strange person, I can see the relevance of that to a missile strike but how on earth does it impinge on your suggested invasion across the polar wastes?
Large aircraft are able to fly "blow radar" and as I pointed out, over the poles is the shortest route. EY?
Duh?! EY?
Can VS USA
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:20 am
by spot
downag wrote: Large aircraft are able to fly "blow radar" and as I pointed out, over the poles is the shortest route. EY?
Duh?! EY?
I'm carefully going through, in my mind, all those occasions in the past when any state has successfully invaded another by air and won. The air-troops are there to provide a beach-head on which more and more material and troops can be landed en masse, I think that's the theory. The Axis did this at Crete and considered it so costly that they never tried it again. Mad Mike Hoare tried it and failed miserably in the Seychelles.
I have it - of course. The model of aerial invasion the Russians must have in mind for their plan to take over the entire United States of America by sending a polar airfleet. Operation Urgent Fury!
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:01 pm
by Odie
MOTime;284217 wrote: This is an opinoin asking post Who would win Canada or the United States in an all out war Front line or Guerilla I need some opinions on that THX
dah, the US!
they have multitudes of military troops, gunfire weapons, misseles, ships, planes, etc.
and most importantly, the US has nuclear weapons.
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:24 pm
by Lon
MOTime;284217 wrote: This is an opinoin asking post Who would win Canada or the United States in an all out war Front line or Guerilla I need some opinions on that THX
Assuming that each had the same number of troops & identical weapons it would be a toss up as to who would win. To think otherwise would be the epitome of Nationalistic naivety. It wouldn't matter if it was Chinese and Canadians or Malthusians and Yanks.
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:24 pm
by spot
Odie;1043281 wrote: and most importantly, the US has nuclear weapons.Actually Canada has a secret fleet of 120 MIRVed CMBs on mobile delivery launchers hidden in hollowed glaciers to eliminate a heat signature. Trudeau had them constructed. He insisted their count-down instructions had to be given in French too.
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:42 pm
by Odie
List of states with nuclear weapons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Semi-protected
Nuclear weapons
Big Boy.
US · Russia · UK · France
PR China · India · Israel
Pakistan · North Korea
Nations that are known or believed to possess nuclear weapons are sometimes referred to as the nuclear club. There are currently nine states that have successfully detonated nuclear weapons. Five are considered to be "nuclear weapons states", an internationally recognized status conferred by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). In order of acquisition of nuclear weapons these are: the United States, Russia (successor state to the Soviet Union), the United Kingdom, France, and China.
Since the NPT entered into force in 1970, three states that were not parties to the Treaty have conducted nuclear tests, namely India, Pakistan, and North Korea. North Korea had been a party to the NPT but withdrew in 2003. Israel is also widely believed to have nuclear weapons, though it has refused to confirm or deny this.[1] The status of these nations is not formally recognized by international bodies as none of them are currently parties to the NPT. South Africa has the unique status of a nation which developed nuclear weapons but has since disassembled its arsenal before joining the NPT.
In 2005, the IAEA Board of Governors found Iran in non-compliance with its NPT safeguards agreement[2][3] in a rare non-consensus decision.[4] The UN Security Council imposed sanctions against Iran three times when it refused to suspend its previously undeclared enrichment.[5][6][7][8] Iran has argued that the sanctions are illegal[9] and compel it to abandon its rights under the NPT to peaceful nuclear technology.[5] IAEA Director Mohamed ElBaradei states the agency is unable to resolve "outstanding issues of concerns" while also noting the Agency has "not seen any diversion of nuclear materials... nor the capacity to produce weapons usable materials".[10]
Estimated worldwide nuclear stockpiles
Map of Nuclear weapons countries of the world. NPT Nuclear Weapon States (China, France, Russia, UK, US) Non-NPT Nuclear Weapon States (India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan) States accused of having nuclear weapons programs (Iran, Syria) NATO weapons sharing weapons recipients States formerly possessing nuclear weapons
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:04 pm
by spot
Well duh... it's a secret fleet!
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:15 pm
by Odie
spot;1043394 wrote: Well duh... it's a secret fleet!
your believing way to much what Trudeau had `said`.
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:21 pm
by spot
Odie;1043410 wrote: your believing way to much what Trudeau had `said`.
All these years and the US never invaded? I think the case is pretty well confirmed in my favour.
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:15 pm
by Odie
spot;1043416 wrote: All these years and the US never invaded? I think the case is pretty well confirmed in my favour.
--what did this have to do with your saying because of what trudeau said, Canada has nucleur weapons.:rolleyes:
Can VS USA
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:16 pm
by spot
Odie;1043513 wrote: --what did this have to do with your saying because of what trudeau said, Canada has nucleur weapons.:rolleyes:
That if Canada hadn't had secret nuclear weapons all this time, the US would have treated Canada the way the Israelis have treated the West Bank and you'd have no trees left by now.
Can VS USA
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:53 am
by Oscar Namechange
If there was an out and out war between Canada and the USA, Britain will butt out of this one if you please.
You get on with it, and us British will all have a nice cup of tea while your at it.
When you've finished, just send us a postcard. Many thanks, Great Britain.
Can VS USA
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:14 am
by Nomad
We'd kick some Canadian ass.
Mon. 9am
We'd send in an elite recon team to scope out the coordinates.
Then we would fly overhead with those unmanned aircraft and drop a few cluster bombs on Quebec and Montreal.
Mon. 10:30 am
Canada surrenders and becomes our 51st state.
Can VS USA
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:25 am
by mikeinie
If you have never seen Canadia Bacon, you have missed a great movie.
YouTube - Canadian Bacon Trailer
Can VS USA
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:28 am
by mikeinie
The Canadian secret weapon is the French Canadians, once the US invaded the Quebecois would start their bitching and complaining and soon the Americans would make a hasty retreat.