ForumGarden

Omni_Skittles;991582 wrote: Under twenty!


I added that category with you in mind hun:-4..I see we have one more...maybe we have more than 2 but they haven't voted

Chezzie;991674 wrote: I added that category with you in mind hun:-4..I see we have one more...maybe we have more than 2 but they haven't votedYAY haha I'm thought about!!!

Omni_Skittles;991724 wrote: YAY haha I'm thought about!!!


Of course you are, your our bright little shiny button here at FG:-4

Looks like I'm in one of the minority groups. Not sayin' which though. Ok. I'm 53. But I was 54 last year.:-6

Chezzie;991728 wrote: Of course you are, your our bright little shiny button here at FG:-4aww i wouldn't go that far...

Omni_Skittles;991749 wrote: aww i wouldn't go that far...


ok rusty presstud?:wah::wah::wah:

Ian;992237 wrote: Answering your previous question, I was just trying to work out the largest age group.And the unit of people density in this case is the people per year? 1 ppy over a 10 year age range is 10 people?

Let's to the sums then...



under 20 2 4.17% 2 per 20 years, 0.1 ppy

20 to 30 3 6.25% 3 per 10 years, 0.33 ppy

30 to 40 10 20.83% 10 per 10 years, 1 ppy

40 to 45 5 10.42% 5 per 5 years, 1 ppy

45 to 50 11 22.92% 11 per 5 years, 2.2 ppy

50 to 55 6 12.50% 6 per 5 year, 1.2 ppy

55 to 60 5 10.42% 5 per 5 years, 1 ppy

Over 60 6 12.50% 6 per 1000000 years, 0 ppyand the winner is the 45 to 50 group with 2.2 people per year.

If you want to choose a 20 year period then

30 to 50, 26 per 20 years, 1.3 ppy

40 to 60, 27 per 20 years, 1.35 ppy

except until today it was the same ppy for both ranges. Which is why I asked why you picked just the one you picked.