How important are boobs?

CARLA · Post by **CARLA** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:13 pm

Yes it is Jimbo..!!

[QUOTE]Is Farmer Giles a reincarnation of Jimbo?????[/QUOTE]

G-man · Post by **G-man** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:32 pm

Boobs are VERY important, in my opinion.

I am certain that I mainly hold this view, as well... because I don't have any, myself! I've been with women who've represented both extremes and everywhere in between and I find all sizes and shapes equally fascinating. Boobs don't make the woman. One thing I don't like however, are breast implants... it doesn't matter why a woman has them, whatever the reason, don't get them... just accept what G_d has given (or taken...) you and if guys can't accept that then screw 'em.

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:10 am

G-man;1200335 wrote: Boobs are VERY important, in my opinion.

I am certain that I mainly hold this view, as well... because I don't have any, myself! I've been with women who've represented both extremes and everywhere in between and I find all sizes and shapes equally fascinating. Boobs don't make the woman. One thing I don't like however, are breast implants... it doesn't matter why a woman has them, whatever the reason, don't get them... just accept what G_d has given (or taken...) you and if guys can't accept that then screw 'em.

G-man - you are a man. If you had no discernible penis, but all the other male accoutrements - would you accept that, or if it were possible to have an implant that made you look are function normally, would you go there? This is a serious question. I'm not talking now about all the silly ads about increasing length etc. I'm talking about just having something which most ordinary men have. Would you go there, or would you just accept what God has given (or taken..)?

I expect a woman who really loves you, or a man who really loves a woman would and should accept them however they are, but for yourself. for your own feeling of manhood, for your quality of life - would choose not to do it?

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:51 am

Implants is interesting to bring into the conversation as there are good one's and bad one's. I know a girl who has them and they are fab, they look real and feel real. I know coz i felt em

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:04 am

buttercup;1200448 wrote: Implants is interesting to bring into the conversation : D: lips:

If I *wanted* a plastic woman, I could go out and buy one.

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:28 pm

My point was more - you would not know they were fake.

If you meet a woman with implants and she tells you much later she has them, are you going to dump her because of it?

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:44 pm

buttercup;1200487 wrote: My point was more - you would not know they were fake.

Hm. I bet you that I would have a very, very good chance indeed of niticing such things "in the flesh".

buttercup;1200487 wrote: If you meet a woman with implants and she tells you much later she has them, are you going to dump her because of it?

That would depend, of course, on many other factors.

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:15 pm

I'd really like to see a male response to my question to G-man about penis implants - which was intended in all seriousness. What about you Bill Sikes - would you do it?

Here's what I wrote

G-man - you are a man. If you had no discernible penis, but all the other male accoutrements - would you accept that, or if it were possible to have an implant that made you look are function normally, would you go there? This is a serious question. I'm not talking now about all the silly ads about increasing length etc. I'm talking about just having something which most ordinary men have. Would you go there, or would you just accept what God has given (or taken..)?

I expect a woman who really loves you, or a man who really loves a woman would and should accept them however they are, but for yourself. for your own feeling of manhood, for your quality of life - would choose not to do it?

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:47 pm

AussiePam;1200545 wrote: I'd really like to see a male response to my question to G-man about penis implants - which was intended in all seriousness. What about you Bill Sikes - would you do it?

Here's what I wrote

G-man - you are a man. If you had no discernible penis, but all the other male accoutrements - would you accept that, or if it were possible to have an implant that made you look are function normally, would you go there? This is a serious question. I'm not talking now about all the silly ads about increasing length etc. I'm talking about just having something which most ordinary men have. Would you go there, or would you just accept what God has given (or taken..)?

I expect a woman who really loves you, or a man who really loves a woman would and should accept them however they are, but for yourself. for your own feeling of manhood, for your quality of life - would choose not to do it?

Pam. I think penis size maybe a bigger issue for men than breast size is for women. Women like to reasure men that size doesnt matter but for many women it is a factor and we know that. That very fact makes us enormously self consious of our size, to the extent that many men think they are below average when in fact they are perfectly fine. Men may have a preference to breast size but it isnt really a huge issue, one way or the other. Men just like breasts. Period

I would not, personally consider, penile implants, or even a reduction

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:56 pm

AussiePam;1200545 wrote: I'd really like to see a male response to my question to G-man about penis implants - which was intended in all seriousness. What about you Bill Sikes - would you do it?

Here's what I wrote

If you had no discernible penis, but all the other male accoutrements - would you accept that, or if it were possible to have an implant that made you look are function normally, would you go there? This is a serious question. I'm not talking now about all the silly ads about increasing length etc. I'm talking about just having something which most ordinary men have. Would you go there, or would you just accept what God has given (or taken..)?

I expect a woman who really loves you, or a man who really loves a woman would and should accept them however they are, but for yourself. for your own feeling of manhood, for your quality of life - would choose not to do it?

Of course, AP - I have been pondering this, off and on, since you posted it - however, I would observe that the comparison you are making, equating having a non-existant knob to having small tits, is not at all a valid one.

So - thus far, were it the case:

If it meant nothing to my "someone", then no, I would not. I would, in fact, expect to be dissuaded from such a course of action - should this *truly* mean nothing to my "someone" - for one thing, surgical procedures are not risk-free. The things which would influence me to do such a thing would be biological functionality, or "someone's" desire for this putative operation. Had I no "someone", of course, there would be a considerable temptation to extend my apparatus.

I may have some more thoughts on this later. In the meantime, what do *you* think?

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:29 pm

A young man, aged 19 is seriously underendowed, both in flaccid and erect state. He has so little, he is depressed, becomes withdrawn, doesn't dare enter a relationship in case he is mocked. (I am not here suggesting he would be mocked - I am saying he feels he would be, therefore avoids intimacy). He eventually gets medical help, sees a psychiatrist and a doctor who confirm that he has indeed got a physical problem - which can be dealt with in one of two ways.

He can have counselling to help him accept his handicap and may regain his confidence, and may take the social risk of intimacy, and may find that some women can love and accept him for himself.

or

He can have surgery which will give him a modest but functional penis which will look and feel "normal". (I am not saying such an operation exists, but this is all hypothetical anyway.)

What would you choose?

-----

I am close to a woman who made such a decision on her own account. Her situation was much as the hypothetical male one I've posted. She could have gone either way. She was under no pressure from male friends, who accepted her for herself. Yet she still feared rejection and shied away from intimacy.

She opted for surgery and now looks great. She feels great. She has regained her confidence.

I'd do it.

If my nose was malformed, and I could afford to get it fixed, I'd do it. If I had a sixth toe and could get that fixed, I'd do it. If my ears stuck out to the extent where I felt a freak and I could get that fixed, I'd do it. I'd do these things for myself. I would hope that my real friends would feel the same about me before and after. But I'd feel different. Better.

Postscript.

I lost one eyebrow completely in a small gas explosion. It never regrew. I lived for years with only one eyebrow. Nobody complained and it didn't bother me that much. But one day I thought - heck, I'd prefer to have two eyebrowS. So I saved up and got it tattooed on. I did good.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:46 pm

Pam---I don't think you can compare breasts and penis's. Breasts are not necessary to perform the sexual act.

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:29 pm

thank gawd i would never have to consider plastic surgery for fake boobs. The only time they got huge were 4 preggars...and then deflated back to the normal size...34B.:wah:

hoppy · Post by **hoppy** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:22 pm

When I hook up with a gal pal, I accept her "as is".

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:30 pm

hoppy;1200693 wrote: When I hook up with a gal pal, I accept her "as is".

And thats the way it should be. I love the compliment:-4

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:00 pm

Lon;1200586 wrote: Pam---I don't think you can compare breasts and penis's. Breasts are not necessary to perform the sexual act.

That would be true if you define a man or a woman only in terms of their being able to perform the sexual act - and define that sexual act as of necessity involving penetration.

This would of course mean that a man who suffers erectile disfuncion as a result of prostate cancer is no longer a man, but some kind of eunuch. I don't accept this, but think I've probably had my say, and will retire gracefully...

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:53 am

AussiePam;1200582 wrote: A young man, aged 19 is seriously underendowed, both in flaccid and erect state. He has so little, he is depressed, becomes withdrawn, doesn't dare enter a relationship in case he is mocked. (I am not here suggesting he would be mocked - I am saying he feels he would be, therefore avoids intimacy). He eventually gets medical help, sees a psychiatrist and a doctor who confirm that he has indeed got a physical problem - which can be dealt with in one of two ways.

He can have counselling to help him accept his handicap and may regain his confidence, and may take the social risk of intimacy, and may find that some women can love and accept him for himself.

or

He can have surgery which will give him a modest but functional penis which will look and feel "normal". (I am not saying such an operation exists, but this is all hypothetical anyway.)

What would you choose?

Certainly in such an extreme and traumatic situation as this, there is a case for surgery. I would consider it under those circumstances. Too often I have seen reports of men having surgery to extend there 6/7 inch penis because they are convinced that they are freakishly small. Who is convincing them that they are below average.

How did a thread on Boobs morph into a thread on penis size ?

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:25 am

Snowfire;1200728 wrote: Certainly in such an extreme and traumatic situation as this, there is a case for surgery. I would consider it under those circumstances.

That was all I was asking.

Snowfire;1200728 wrote: Too often I have seen reports of men having surgery to extend there 6/7 inch penis because they are convinced that they are freakishly small. Who is convincing them that they are below average.

I thought I was being very very careful to exclude that kind of silliness.

Snowfire;1200728 wrote: How did a thread on Boobs morph into a thread on penis size ?

No, I guess I morphed it a little into a thread on self perceptions of masculinity and femininity, and then put in some personal stuff. Apologies to Buttercup and the rest of you... I do spiral off sometimes..

The OP dealt with boobies and sweat underneath and cleavage and wrinklies. I'm done on my little tangent.. carry on!!!

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:16 am

No apology needed, all threads go off topic. Carry on :-6

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:43 am

Lon;1200586 wrote: Pam---I don't think you can compare breasts and penis's. Breasts are not necessary to perform the sexual act. You've never enjoyed a soapy tit w**k then? :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:44 am

hoppy;1200693 wrote: When I hook up with a gal pal, I accept her "as is".

:yh_clap:yh_clap

awesome Hoppy, that's the way it should be.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:17 am

[quote=AussiePam;1200711]That would be true if you define a man or a woman only in terms of their being able to perform the sexual act - and define that sexual act as of necessity involving penetration.

Are you saying then that a woman is defined by her breasts and a man by his penis?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:19 am

Lon;1200782 wrote: [quote=AussiePam;1200711]That would be true if you define a man or a woman only in terms of their being able to perform the sexual act - and define that sexual act as of necessity involving penetration.

Are you saying then that a woman is defined by her breasts and a man by his penis?
Boobs are not important as it's a womans intelligent mind that matters. Where as men don't have minds of their own so they need a penis

They also need an arsse in which to talk out of.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:24 am

oscar;1200783 wrote: [quote=Lon;1200782]

Boobs are not important as it's a womans intelligent mind that matters. Where as men don't have minds of their own so they need a penis

They also need an arsse in which to talk out of.

Yes I agree--------------I can see your intelligent mind at work as you post your thoughtful replies.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:30 am

Lon;1200784 wrote: [quote=oscar;1200783]

Yes I agree--------------I can see your intelligent mind at work as you post your thoughtful replies.

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl This lady has more than enough

Attached files

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:31 am

oscar;1200786 wrote: [quote=Lon;1200784] :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl This lady has more than enough

You have a lot of class Oscar.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:33 am

Lon;1200787 wrote: [quote=oscar;1200786]

You have a lot of class Oscar.

It's what makes me special :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:32 pm

Aussiepam: Are you saying that when you have sex, the size of the penis involved is irrelevant?

mikeinie · Post by **mikeinie** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:16 am

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:48 am

mikeinie;1203065 wrote:

your just bad!:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

I'm sure being in the right place does matter with those!:wah::wah:

Odin · Post by **Odin** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:34 am

I must confess, I do like women who are curvy, but they don't have to be carrying space hoppers around with them.