ForumGarden

Nomad;1231583 wrote: I will sue you like no one has been sued before. Ill sue you right into the bowels of hell itself. When I get done with you you will be spraying car windows at stop lights and begging for change.

Im going to get started on that right now.

Well, I have to go to work first and then Im probably going to relax and watch a movie but soon. Pretty soon. Then we will have to counter sue :wah:

Nomad;1231583 wrote: I will sue you like no one has been sued before. Ill sue you right into the bowels of hell itself. When I get done with you you will be spraying car windows at stop lights and begging for change.

Im going to get started on that right now.

Well, I have to go to work first and then Im probably going to relax and watch a movie but soon. Pretty soon.


And I'll counter sue you for slandering my good name:wah: and for making me fall off my chair laughing:sneaky:

I can't believe Sue hasn't come on this thread to take up for herself. She sure has been mentioned a lot without responding. Oh well maybe Sue is talking to her lawyers.



Sue I in no way meant to infer anything about you in this post. Please keep the YZGI dude out of this Sue one upmanship. Thank you very much.

YZGI;1231587 wrote: I can't believe Sue hasn't come on this thread to take up for herself. She sure has been mentioned a lot without responding. Oh well maybe Sue is talking to her lawyers.



Sue I in no way meant to infer anything about you in this post. Please keep the YZGI dude out of this Sue one upmanship. Thank you very much.
Now come on Wise Guy....... this is not fair on lou lou belle........ her thread is going off topic again.

oscar;1231589 wrote: Now come on Wise Guy....... this is not fair on lou lou belle........ her thread is going off topic again.
I thought Sue was the topic.























































Now don't move this to the Jerry Springer thread. That might make Sue unhappy. She don't like Jerry.

oscar;1231589 wrote: Now come on Wise Guy....... this is not fair on lou lou belle........ her thread is going off topic again.


Yes, the men in the white coats knocked up for her:wah:

lou lou belle;1231572 wrote:

Lets see how many friends want to be party to this and will admit to recieving emails and literature that is libelous.
I think If we get to the nitty gritty of your thread, this is the point that bothers you the most......... that folk on here are so close.

As you don't seem to understand what has happened here I will try to explain.

Most folk come on here and introduce themselves with a profile. Over time, they join in a variety of threads and common ground is found. Over the 14 months I have been here I have cried with the one's who have lost babies and husbands, laughed at the one's who joke and I have fallen out big time with one's I don't agree with over politics. Even one's you fall out with, after time, you learn a mutual respect for their beliefs. You may not like them but you respect them for their wisdom and knowledge. Most members here including myself bare all the warts. Yep, even my sisters boy being charged with murder........ Do you know why I can talk about my 16 yr old nephew being in custody awaiting trial for murder in April ? Because no-one here is so shallow to judge. They have the depth to understand. That's why we bare all on this forum and what makes it so special.

In time, you find true friends that phone you, send you gifts in the post and e mail you their funnie's. Not because they or any-one is inventing themselves behind a screen...... but because we are honest enough to admit our faults and share those those faults.

All the folk on the forum have done exactly that. There will always be members that do not like you but you earn respect by contributing in a manner that makes folk see the real you. I know things about members on this forum that I would never repeat on an open board. That's because the friends here trust me with their confidentiality. Most of us are on facebook and we can see exactly what each others lives are about. You know they are true friends when they are still here by your side even after all your warts have been bared.

Very well said Julie and so true:-6

Kathy Ellen;1231616 wrote: Very well said Julie and so true:-6


Seconded.

Bryn Mawr;1231189 wrote: It'd be damn'd bad publicity for the company if they tried.


Amen.

Bill Sikes;1231242 wrote: What you view as "teen posts.


You may just be being funny here but mustang said up teen posts :wah: meaning multiples??



lou lou belle;1231492 wrote: Bill The only difficulty i have is reading post that are libellous and inflamatory.




You are inflammatory. I don't know the whole story and don't care to but ya sound like a big whiner to me and remind me of a two year old that screams "she looked at me" If you and your following came here to discuss topics good but all I've seen thus far is you in here trying to threaten someone with legal consequences. In the process, you're maimed attempts at defocation if their character will hold up in court as well.

Get a life. The lacking of is pretty well what this boils down to. Move on, if you're so much better of a person, I'd like to see ya prove it. I've found the best way to deal with people that don't like me or I don't like, is to avoid them. Obviously, you enjoy the drama :rolleyes: (that was an attempt to belittle you, feel free to sue)

lou lou belle;1231525 wrote: not the use pf profanity and smilies in an attempt to belittle the thread starter.


You are entirely too concerned with feeling belittled. Did you not get hugged enough as a child? The use of profanity is just how some talk, I can make a sailor blush my damn self. (that was not an attempt to belittle)



Barman;1231623 wrote: Seconded.


Thirded

Thirded:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap

qsducks;1231632 wrote: Thirded:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap


Fourth'd hehehe

i like nearly everyone here

in fact thanks to this and other threads by the this author i even like oscar now

lets face it if you are a person with passion you are always gonna upset some one even when you try not too :rolleyes:

and if you are a person who thinks they are funny there is always some one waiting to scream not funny just ask wisey or barman :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

the whole point of this stupid thread in my opinion was another dig at oscar myass

like the others it has all backfired and oscars friends and even some who dislike her have all rallied round

i and everyone else i know join forums to make friends not to harras people :-6:-6

oscar;1231614 wrote: I think If we get to the nitty gritty of your thread, this is the point that bothers you the most......... that folk on here are so close.

As you don't seem to understand what has happened here I will try to explain.

Most folk come on here and introduce themselves with a profile. Over time, they join in a variety of threads and common ground is found. Over the 14 months I have been here I have cried with the one's who have lost babies and husbands, laughed at the one's who joke and I have fallen out big time with one's I don't agree with over politics. Even one's you fall out with, after time, you learn a mutual respect for their beliefs. You may not like them but you respect them for their wisdom and knowledge. Most members here including myself bare all the warts. Yep, even my sisters boy being charged with murder........ Do you know why I can talk about my 16 yr old nephew being in custody awaiting trial for murder in April ? Because no-one here is so shallow to judge. They have the depth to understand. That's why we bare all on this forum and what makes it so special.

In time, you find true friends that phone you, send you gifts in the post and e mail you their funnie's. Not because they or any-one is inventing themselves behind a screen...... but because we are honest enough to admit our faults and share those those faults.

All the folk on the forum have done exactly that. There will always be members that do not like you but you earn respect by contributing in a manner that makes folk see the real you. I know things about members on this forum that I would never repeat on an open board. That's because the friends here trust me with their confidentiality. Most of us are on facebook and we can see exactly what each others lives are about. You know they are true friends when they are still here by your side even after all your warts have been bared.


I,m sorry but if you think that all people on this forum are supportive of people who's family relatives are being tried for MURDER, then you are totally mistaken.

You speak like it was just something that happened, MY GOD a person has died and your nephew is being tried for it.

Get real and do not use that as a tool for sympathy, it wont wash.

You should be ashamed of him and definately not try and use that tragedy to win brownie points. I am sure the relatives and friends of the murdered victim will not be supporting your family. Truly shameful. :-5

farmer giles;1231638 wrote: i like nearly everyone here

in fact thanks to this and other threads by the this author i even like oscar now

lets face it if you are a person with passion you are always gonna upset some one even when you try not too :rolleyes:

and if you are a person who thinks they are funny there is always some one waiting to scream not funny just ask wisey or barman :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

the whole point of this stupid thread in my opinion was another dig at oscar myass

like the others it has all backfired and oscars friends and even some who dislike her have all rallied round

i and everyone else i know join forums to make friends not to harras people :-6:-6


rubbish, especially as you emailed me and told me to be careful of Oscar back in July, a little two faced i feel. Or should i say red faced. Pathetic really

in the know;1231640 wrote: I,m sorry but if you think that all people on this forum are supportive of people who's family relatives are being tried for MURDER, then you are totally mistaken.

You speak like it was just something that happened, MY GOD a person has died and your nephew is being tried for it.

Get real and do not use that as a tool for sympathy, it wont wash.

You should be ashamed of him and definately not try and use that tragedy to win brownie points. I am sure the relatives and friends of the murdered victim will not be supporting your family. Truly shameful. :-5




If you knew Oscar, then you would know that she is NOT looking for brownie points or sympathy.....She is absolutely heartbroken for the family of the murdered victim and certainly NOT approving the actions of her nephew.

in the know;1231643 wrote: rubbish, especially as you emailed me and told me to be careful of Oscar back in July, a little two faced i feel. Or should i say red faced. Pathetic really


Doesn't matter We all say things out of annoyance or anger that we regret, but in the long run we discuss our issue and try to forgive. That's why most of us remain friends...because we can forgive.

in the know;1231640 wrote: I,m sorry but if you think that all people on this forum are supportive of people who's family relatives are being tried for MURDER, then you are totally mistaken.

You speak like it was just something that happened, MY GOD a person has died and your nephew is being tried for it.

Get real and do not use that as a tool for sympathy, it wont wash.

You should be ashamed of him and definately not try and use that tragedy to win brownie points. I am sure the relatives and friends of the murdered victim will not be supporting your family. Truly shameful. :-5


First off, llb started som stupid thread over libeling/suing, etc. and yes most peeps here defended a certain member who it was being pointed at....certain member was only making a generalization to the question asked. Yeah, we all know somebody got killed...certain member is not DEFENDING him...certain member is appalled at it. It would probs take you a month to read back on certain members comments about the case. Pull your head outta the sand.

in the know;1231640 wrote: I,m sorry but if you think that all people on this forum are supportive of people who's family relatives are being tried for MURDER, then you are totally mistaken.

You speak like it was just something that happened, MY GOD a person has died and your nephew is being tried for it.

Get real and do not use that as a tool for sympathy, it wont wash.

You should be ashamed of him and definately not try and use that tragedy to win brownie points. I am sure the relatives and friends of the murdered victim will not be supporting your family. Truly shameful. :-5
Hang on......... to quote your words in a previous thread.......... they are 'children'.

Once again you come in trolling while being in the dark without a light switch to cling to. Sorry but your Shyte stirring with Jimbo doesn't wash with any of us.

For your imfo although it's not actually any of your business........ Two things:

I have met the family of his victem.... suck on that bitter juice of yours beacuse they are not.

May I remind you that my nephew has pleaded not guilty and is due for a fair trial by jury. Or have you judged already again? I know the full details of that case, you don't unless his brief has breached Sub judice by contacting you because you are so important........ yeah right :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Kathy Ellen;1231644 wrote: If you knew Oscar, then you would know that she is NOT looking for brownie points or sympathy.....She is absolutely heartbroken for the family of the murdered victim and certainly NOT approving the actions of her nephew. Kathy.... don't waste the skin on your fingers typing a reply to in the dark......... she's here to Troll no more.

I'm seeing my nephew in prison friday so I tell him they send their best wishes :wah:

To be charged with murder is truly disgraceful. Such a shame that people dont realise the enormity of that alone!

CPS dont go ahead and allow a charging decsion without all the evidence being brought to them first. The very fact that he has been charged with MURDER is in itself a serious place to be.

lou lou belle;1231649 wrote: To be charged with murder is truly disgraceful. Such a shame that people dont realise the enormity of that alone!

CPS dont go ahead and allow a charging decsion without all the evidence being brought to them first. The very fact that he has been charged with MURDER is in itself a serious place to be.
But they are children :yh_rotfl

Lou, Lou....are you and "in the know" the same person? It just seems funny that when she logs off...you log on....



I think we need to check IP numbers here...

oscar;1231651 wrote: But they are children :yh_rotfl


I, glad you find this subject funny. This really shows you at your best light.

What on earth is so funny about them being children (16 years old) MURDER is Murder, its no laughing matter.

I have spent enough time with Juvenilles that have been on remand for murder, and funny... they were,nt laughing.

First off, mr./mrs. "In the know" ... who the hell are you? You've posted 4 times and all that screams to me is that you were sent here or you followed someone here and must be part of lou lou's gang or you are lou lou as well. You lot are just a bunch of drama queens. I hope ya find what ya came here for cuz a few of us will definitely have fun with ya.



in the know;1231640 wrote: I,m sorry but if you think that all people on this forum are supportive of people who's family relatives are being tried for MURDER, then you are totally mistaken.

You speak like it was just something that happened, MY GOD a person has died and your nephew is being tried for it.

Get real and do not use that as a tool for sympathy, it wont wash.

You should be ashamed of him and definately not try and use that tragedy to win brownie points. I am sure the relatives and friends of the murdered victim will not be supporting your family. Truly shameful. :-5


Not that this really deserves a rational response but here goes anyway.

You act as if the family member grieving for their nephew committed the crime as well.

Were they there?

Are they supposed to cut off any emotional connection with the family member because of the crime?

in the know;1231643 wrote: Pathetic really


Yes, this is pathetic. Really.

lou lou belle;1231653 wrote: I, glad you find this subject funny. This really shows you at your best light.

What on earth is so funny about them being children (16 years old) MURDER is Murder, its no laughing matter.

I have spent enough time with Juvenilles that have been on remand for murder, and funny... they were,nt laughing.


Are you a cop?

If so, it'd explain A LOT!

lou lou belle;1231649 wrote: To be charged with murder is truly disgraceful. Such a shame that people dont realise the enormity of that alone!

CPS dont go ahead and allow a charging decsion without all the evidence being brought to them first. The very fact that he has been charged with MURDER is in itself a serious place to be.


Your the one who got nailed for lying in court...lost your job, etc. So, whats your point? Why are you picking on Oscar?

qsducks;1231646 wrote: First off, llb started som stupid thread over libeling/suing, etc. and yes most peeps here defended a certain member who it was being pointed at....certain member was only making a generalization to the question asked. Yeah, we all know somebody got killed...certain member is not DEFENDING him...certain member is appalled at it. It would probs take you a month to read back on certain members comments about the case. Pull your head outta the sand. The reason I shared Nephs arrest with this forum was because I knew that all of you would tell me exactly what you thought of it in truth without fear of upsetting me. I am also a big enough person to take the critism as well as the support I got. If I didn't like critisim, I would not have posted It. That's what I said earlier........ we bare warts and all.

Yes the CPS will always charge when there is more than 2 co-defendents. It's up to a Jury to decide who did exactly what that night. Until then, even though I know a hell of a lot more than anyone including the man's autopsy results and forensic evidence.... even I have to give him the benifit of the doubt. ;)

Depends on the nature of the crime, I am sure that many family members would detach themselves from the offender.

And... i have actually seen cases of this.. where juvenilles were cut off from any contact from their family. So you see not all familes support this type of crime.

Kathy Ellen;1231652 wrote: Lou, Lou....are you and "in the know" the same person? It just seems funny that when she logs off...you log on....



I think we need to check IP numbers here...
It's already been done Kathy ;)

almostfamous;1231657 wrote: Are you a cop?

If so, it'd explain A LOT!
She might have been a cop..... not sure ........ perhaps she'll tell us.

qsducks;1231658 wrote: Your the one who got nailed for lying in court...lost your job, etc. So, whats your point? Why are you picking on Oscar?


The police officer in question WAS NEVER NAILED FOR LYING IN COURT READ the papers dummy.... And she did not lose her job.. God where are you getting your information from. Be very careful, go back to the main thread and read it carefully.

lou lou belle;1231660 wrote: Depends on the nature of the crime, I am sure that many family members would detach themselves from the offender.

And... i have actually seen cases of this.. where juvenilles were cut off from any contact from their family. So you see not all familes support this type of crime. And where do you glean that his family is supporting him? Where do you glean that he is guilty? Let's say the Jury finds over-whelmingly that he's not guilty? Then what........ go and tell him your sorry for not giving him the benifit of the doubt? Oh and by the way son, we'd like you back in the family now.

Yep, that just about shows your nature.

Kathy Ellen;1231652 wrote: Lou, Lou....are you and "in the know" the same person? It just seems funny that when she logs off...you log on....



I think we need to check IP numbers here...


Kathy we are two different people, but using the computer at work, so we share the IP address. I believe that is ok.

oscar;1231662 wrote: She might have been a cop..... not sure ........ perhaps she'll tell us.


I think she just did...

lou lou belle;1231663 wrote: The police officer in question WAS NEVER NAILED FOR LYING IN COURT READ the papers dummy.... And she did not lose her job.. God where are you getting your information from. Be very careful, go back to the main thread and read it carefully.

lou lou belle;1231666 wrote: Kathy we are two different people, but using the computer at work, so we share the IP address. I believe that is ok.


:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

and um, :yh_rotfl ?

If that is supposed to indicated that i have hung myself then, please i think you,ll find otherwise. I just love being right.:wah:

oscar;1231659 wrote: The reason I shared Nephs arrest with this forum was because I knew that all of you would tell me exactly what you thought of it in truth without fear of upsetting me. I am also a big enough person to take the critism as well as the support I got. If I didn't like critisim, I would not have posted It. That's what I said earlier........ we bare warts and all.

Yes the CPS will always charge when there is more than 2 co-defendents. It's up to a Jury to decide who did exactly what that night. Until then, even though I know a hell of a lot more than anyone including the man's autopsy results and forensic evidence.... even I have to give him the benifit of the doubt. ;)


And we all did defend you Oscar...but two twats get on here & start trolling/harrassing & flaming...you know where we all stand.

lou lou belle;1231666 wrote: Kathy we are two different people, but using the computer at work, so we share the IP address. I believe that is ok.


Somebody gave you a job:eek:

almostfamous;1231669 wrote: :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

and um, :yh_rotfl ? We'll have MellyB and Jeanne on next and it'll be the same IP address.

almostfamous;1231669 wrote: :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl



and um, :yh_rotfl ?




don't get it, sorry.

Oh how mighty is the keyboard, its so easy to sit behind a computer screen typing angrily and not knowing the facts i also imagine a little frustrated, Are we getting upset, cos i have joined and given you all something to think about. It must be so exciting to your lives at this point, somehthing to bitch about. Aint that the truth.

As i said before read the thread at the beginning and i am sure you will can see the facts.

qsducks;1231671 wrote: And we all did defend you Oscar...but two twats get on here & start trolling/harrassing & flaming...you know where we all stand. Every one here see's what going on Ducks. For the record......... If Neph is found guilty by a Jury of his peers, he will serve his time like a man and I will respect him for that at least.

lou lou belle;1231663 wrote: The police officer in question WAS NEVER NAILED FOR LYING IN COURT READ the papers dummy.... And she did not lose her job.. God where are you getting your information from. Be very careful, go back to the main thread and read it carefully.


I'm the dummy? I could easily report you for flaming and call you loads of names...but I'm too posh for that:yh_rotfl. You are intentionally trying to get all of Oscar's friends to flame you back...are you that bored or did your unemployment check not come through yet? You obs have anger issues with Oscar who has done nothing wrong...you lost your job becuase you stink at it. And now your coming after her for a murder that she did not commit....what is wrong with you?

qsducks;1231678 wrote: I'm the dummy? I could easily report you for flaming and call you loads of names...but I'm too posh for that:yh_rotfl. You are intentionally trying to get all of Oscar's friends to flame you back...are you that bored or did your unemployment check not come through yet? You obs have anger issues with Oscar who has done nothing wrong...you lost your job becuase you stink at it. And now your coming after her for a murder that she did not commit....what is wrong with you?


You been reading the Bristol newspapers again ducks?

lou lou belle;1231666 wrote: Kathy we are two different people, but using the computer at work, so we share the IP address. I believe that is ok.


flopstock;1231675 wrote: don't get it, sorry.


I was laughing at the fact that ^^^^^^^^ that is a likely excuse for someone who got flat out caught dallying under two names trying to prove one point.

Barman;1231673 wrote: Somebody gave you a job:eek: I'd like a job there............ they seem to have a lot of tea breaks :wah:

We havent been caught out, its not a crime to share an IP address. How do you think people manage with one computer

lou lou belle;1231682 wrote: We havent been caught out, its not a crime to share an IP address. How do you think people manage with one computer


I was wondering more how do people manage with one brain cell ... or do you share that as well

Is this going to be a movie of the week. If so let me know when to set my DVR.