ForumGarden

Nomad;1298759 wrote: I'm not sure if I'm making sense but what I'm trying to say is that if I become OK with killing another soul then I think it will degrade my own sense of purpose and journey toward being a peaceful and loving person with hopes of attaining some worthwhile wisdom for myself along the way.


I think the significant majority would agree with you but my question is more so about getting down to the detailed truth of the matter. Sure we can afford to detain people but what if we couldn't?

If we, ourselves, lived in say 60,000 BC and our survival depended heavily on each of our peers and could not afford to allow the murder of another individual, at the same time had no ability to detain the being divinely responsible for a future murder, would killing that being be acceptable?

I'd personally not only kill the murderer but I wouldn't guarantee I wouldn't eat the creep...

Oh right, "I'm" uncivilized! :yh_eyerol

(How's that Gilly Willy? :yh_winks! :yh_kisses!)

IF is the biggest word in the English language.

Bruv;1298846 wrote: IF is the biggest word in the English language. I beg to differ... It's ' I '

Bruv;1298846 wrote: IF is the biggest word in the English language.


"If" serves as precedent so that people can have the ability in remaining logical.

'If' my aunt had testes she would be my uncle.

Bruv;1298912 wrote: 'If' my aunt had testes she would be my uncle.

Bruv;1298912 wrote: 'If' my aunt had testes she would be my uncle. Not nessessarily... My Uncle was a Lesbian.

oscar;1298930 wrote: Not nessessarily... My Uncle was a Lesbian.


That explains a lot about your present confusions.

Bruv;1298934 wrote: That explains a lot about your present confusions.
Now Now :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Bruv;1298912 wrote: 'If' my aunt had testes she would be my uncle.


Well, it's good to know you're finally catching on :yh_wink