Small Town Corruption?
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:43 pm
The following came to pass in the last few days in Martinsville, Virginia, home of the famed NASCAR Speedway. Are there similar problems with alleged corruption in other small southern towns, or is this just an isolated event in 2006?
"Conscientious city resident pays off non-refundable deposit"
by Bill Wyatt (Friday January 6, 2006 at 12:35pm) [martinsvilledaily.com]
"In today's Martinsville Bulletin it was reported that the City of Martinsville had reserved space at the Berry Hill Resort in South Boston with a non-refundable deposit of $1,745, but the resort had refunded the money because a "private group took over the city's reservations." City Manager Dan Collins would not identify the group to the Bulletin, but we have learned who it is. Although we have not been given permission to release the involved party, we feel it is important to point out that the non-refundable commitment the city made was returned because a conscientious city resident paid off the amount in the interest of resolving a controversial issue and diminishing the embarrassment to new city manager Dan Collins who had recommended Council spend over $9,000 for a three-day retreat to discuss the financial distress of the City."
http://www.martinsvilledaily.com
January 6, 2006 Post #4 by "Joe Fridays" on the martinsvilledaily.com forum:
"According to an initial release from the city manager's office, the money paid to the site of the proposed city retreat was non-refundable and then in another release he indicated the resort would refund the city's deposit when the retreat was canceled and another private group was able to obtain the use of the city's reservations.. According to a news item on the Martinsville Daily website today, the money was not refunded by the resort but was paid back by a concerned citizen to avoid further embarrassment to the city manager over his ill-advised retreat. Certainly this citizen has the best interests of the citizens of Martinsville at heart and is only trying to do damage control but if the report in the Martinsville Daily today is factual and true, therein lies another serious problem."
1) If the press release from the city manager concerning the city receiving a "refund was false or misleading and he (the manager) knew there would be no refund coming from the resort and that the lost funds would be replaced by a private citizen, where does that place the integrity in his dealings with the citizens when controversal issues arise?"
"2) This question would not have surfaced if, as the Daily reports, the original press releases from the city manager had admitted an error was made and a financial loss would be incurred by the city instead of saying the resort was accomodating the city and agreeing to refund a non-refundable deposit when this was false and misleading."
"3) There is no shame in admitting an error. The shame occurs when the facts are concealed from the citizens and a misleading and, perhaps false, explanation is given to avoid EMBARRASSMENT!"
"4) Not only does this "official" explanation suddenly take on a smell of "dead fish", the citizens also learn that the city manager's son is the resort manager! While a conflict of interest may not exsist, the appearance of such does."
"5) If misleading and misinformation is present in this minor incident what can citizens expect from the city leader in the future regarding major controversial matters? This may be a minor incident but the implications are far greater than this issue."
http://martinsvillemedia.com/forum/show ... #post41196
:-5 :-5 :-5 :-5
"Conscientious city resident pays off non-refundable deposit"
by Bill Wyatt (Friday January 6, 2006 at 12:35pm) [martinsvilledaily.com]
"In today's Martinsville Bulletin it was reported that the City of Martinsville had reserved space at the Berry Hill Resort in South Boston with a non-refundable deposit of $1,745, but the resort had refunded the money because a "private group took over the city's reservations." City Manager Dan Collins would not identify the group to the Bulletin, but we have learned who it is. Although we have not been given permission to release the involved party, we feel it is important to point out that the non-refundable commitment the city made was returned because a conscientious city resident paid off the amount in the interest of resolving a controversial issue and diminishing the embarrassment to new city manager Dan Collins who had recommended Council spend over $9,000 for a three-day retreat to discuss the financial distress of the City."
http://www.martinsvilledaily.com
January 6, 2006 Post #4 by "Joe Fridays" on the martinsvilledaily.com forum:
"According to an initial release from the city manager's office, the money paid to the site of the proposed city retreat was non-refundable and then in another release he indicated the resort would refund the city's deposit when the retreat was canceled and another private group was able to obtain the use of the city's reservations.. According to a news item on the Martinsville Daily website today, the money was not refunded by the resort but was paid back by a concerned citizen to avoid further embarrassment to the city manager over his ill-advised retreat. Certainly this citizen has the best interests of the citizens of Martinsville at heart and is only trying to do damage control but if the report in the Martinsville Daily today is factual and true, therein lies another serious problem."
1) If the press release from the city manager concerning the city receiving a "refund was false or misleading and he (the manager) knew there would be no refund coming from the resort and that the lost funds would be replaced by a private citizen, where does that place the integrity in his dealings with the citizens when controversal issues arise?"
"2) This question would not have surfaced if, as the Daily reports, the original press releases from the city manager had admitted an error was made and a financial loss would be incurred by the city instead of saying the resort was accomodating the city and agreeing to refund a non-refundable deposit when this was false and misleading."
"3) There is no shame in admitting an error. The shame occurs when the facts are concealed from the citizens and a misleading and, perhaps false, explanation is given to avoid EMBARRASSMENT!"
"4) Not only does this "official" explanation suddenly take on a smell of "dead fish", the citizens also learn that the city manager's son is the resort manager! While a conflict of interest may not exsist, the appearance of such does."
"5) If misleading and misinformation is present in this minor incident what can citizens expect from the city leader in the future regarding major controversial matters? This may be a minor incident but the implications are far greater than this issue."
http://martinsvillemedia.com/forum/show ... #post41196
:-5 :-5 :-5 :-5