Page 1 of 1
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:57 pm
by valerie
http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200607 ... B4BG8.html
This article doesn't report that the Mom was speaking entirely in
Spanish (my local paper had it) and I wonder why? Your husband is
a carpet layer and now you've got NINE kids?
Bet taxpayers footed the bill, too.
:(
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:06 pm
by CARLA
Yikes and they live in a 1 bedroom apartment. :-3 Of course they will get aid for each child and food, and possible rent free housing on the State that's they way we do things here in California. :-5
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:39 pm
by BabyRider
Very irresponsible, Val, you're right. I can understand the want for a large family, but if you can't afford it, (and if they're living in a 1 bedroom apartment obviously they can't) it is just wrong. And it's the kids that will pay the price. Geeze there are some people with ZERO common sense.
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:13 pm
by pantsonfire321@aol.com
Thats nothing, the UK has the monopoly on benefit scrounging - some familys have 13/14 kids and a couple of generations claiming benefits they see it as their right not some thing to fall back on in hard times. They breed children like animals and they grow up to ponce benefits just like mummy and daddy .You would be suprised how many men have 5/6/7 kids by 3/4/5 different women its utterly disgraceful. :-5
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:40 am
by ice maiden
I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:57 am
by pantsonfire321@aol.com
ice maiden wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006310610,00.html
read this one

blimey after 20 kids you wouldn't think her new bloke would touch the sides

11 times a night my arse

I think this is irresponsible
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:18 am
by valerie
Diuretic wrote: If carpet was the only thing he was laying this wouldn't have happened.
:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl