ForumGarden

I'm voting not my business because I don't know much about any of it...but without the "you're an idiot" bit!!

Oh, I've just reread it and it's multiple choice...I'll just shut up...

Pinky wrote: I guess Paul must have seen something in her that he thought was good...I don't know what she's really like, so I can't comment!


I heard she could suck a golf ball through a garden hose

SnoozeControl wrote: A poll


There isn't an "I don't know" option.

Well from what I have read (who know how true any of it is) she has a temper, and is extremely demanding, and from all accounts has a pretty checkered past... I like Paul so I'm in his corner no matter what..

if she ends up fighting him for his money then definitely a gold digger....:rolleyes:

Not my busines..but you are NOT an idiot

I heard she demanded he quit smokin the lettuce. He said no.

If the guy was stupid enough NOT to have a pre nup drawn up before he married an ex call girl come porn star then he deserves to lose half his 800 mil fortune - are sad old men really that stupid . What with all the devastation and death on a daily basis in the third world you would think someone like him could save an awful lot of people with the kind of money he has .:-5

Pinky wrote: I guess Paul must have seen something in her that he thought was good...I don't know what she's really like, so I can't comment!


An old 'git' flattered by a pretty girl......had to end in tears...

pantsonfire321@aol.com wrote: If the guy was stupid enough NOT to have a pre nup drawn up before he married


A "pre-nuptial agreement", if that's what you mean, does not bind the parties

to it, and certainly does not bind the court (although it *may* be taken into

consideration by the court; where a child is involved this is much less likely).

Bill Sikes wrote: A "pre-nuptial agreement", if that's what you mean, does not bind the parties

to it, and certainly does not bind the court (although it *may* be taken into

consideration by the court; where a child is involved this is much less likely).


With 800 million in the bank i'm pretty sure sir paul has the best legal advice money can buy - whether he took that advice we will never know . I for one will certainly be curious to see how this one pans out . I still think the guys an idiot .

Pinky wrote: I guess Paul must have seen something in her that he thought was good...I don't know what she's really like, so I can't comment!


On the bounce - did he see anything?

I don't know how to say this without sounding really catty. But I'm wondering why she is so,......bland looking. I guess it is the "look" in England. I mean, it seams that being skinny with long hair and no makeup and kind of well,.......non-descript is good there.

I'm sorry for him. He's always seemed like a well-meaning person and I'm just sorry about it.

"Not my busines..but you are NOT an idiot"

Ok,is this the chick with the fake leg?

Yep that would be her. :p

[QUOTE]Ok,is this the chick with the fake leg?[/QUOTE]

Well then,in that case..............she doesn't have leg too stand on.

:wah: I came back before turning in for the night just to see if you would say this, and you did.

[QUOTE]Well then,in that case..............she doesn't have leg too stand on.[/QUOTE]

Pinky wrote: Trust me, it's not 'the look ' over here. We're not that bloody boring!


Here, here....

There is another thread here "what are you scared of" my answer.

Her, nightmares serisouly, she's coming after me with the leg.

pantsonfire321@aol.com wrote: If the guy was stupid enough NOT to have a pre nup drawn up before he married an ex call girl come porn star then he deserves to lose half his 800 mil fortune - are sad old men really that stupid . What with all the devastation and death on a daily basis in the third world you would think someone like him could save an awful lot of people with the kind of money he has .:-5


Hear! Hear!

pantsonfire321@aol.com wrote: With 800 million in the bank i'm pretty sure sir paul has the best legal advice money can buy - whether he took that advice we will never know . I for one will certainly be curious to see how this one pans out . I still think the guys an idiot .


Apparently they have hired the two lawyers who dealt with Prince Charles and Princess Diana's divorce! Could be interesting!

How could anyone with a shred of personal integrity think they were entitled to half of all he's got?



Would YOU be willing to expose yourself as a mercenary, money-grabbing BITCH to the world for more than your fair "share?"

It'll be interesting, to say the least. I hope, for both of them, that they emerge with dignity and integrity intact.

Well said, Clancey!

It seems that people who've had a long, loving marriage look for that again and possibly not wisely. I'm just sorry for him, especially if she goes after that money.

Well, his attorney's not exactly inexperienced in these matters, eh?

I think its obscene the amount of money that this guy has - the interest alone that he receives on the money every week would be enough to save thousands of people in Africa . :-5

Screw the people in Africa. . . . I'll be his hoochie for one fourth of what he has! And I have two legs!

LOLOLOLOLOL

pantsonfire321@aol.com wrote: I think its obscene the amount of money that this guy has - the interest alone that he receives on the money every week would be enough to save thousands of people in Africa


Do you work, Mr. Onfire?

Lulu2 wrote: How many millions is self-respect worth? :p


I hear you, Pam, I hear you :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=Bill Sikes]Do you work, Mr. Onfire?[/QUOTE]

Yes and its Mrs .

I have also heard she is a handful with a nasty temper.

If she had a good set of morals and ethics, she wouldn't be trying to rob Paul blind.

Shame on her.

When I got divorced, I walked away with self-respect.

It doesn't look like she'll be doing the same.

How many millions is self-respect worth? :p

L4DD13 wrote: I dont like this thread.

I dont like the fact that you guys seem to be using her 'disability' against her.


I think our sentiments about her greediness are real.

But the comments about her disability are ONLY in good fun.

If you re-read the thread with that in mind, maybe you could see it another way.