ForumGarden

A thread to hear opinions on what level of nudity still fits within PG guidelines.

I'll start the list.

No genitals showing.

No bare breasts.

simulated sex is questionable.

everybody,

get naked.

I love naked.

In all seriousness, now knowing that this forum is PG, we should keep it on a level that shows no more skin than what you would see on MTV. Although, that could be a little much. MTV has gotten pretty bad!

Ok, I'm with Koan, no bare private parts.

When I hear green machine I definitely don't think sexual thoughts.

My kid is almost 12 and the videos she sends me to watch from youtube often have sexual content that makes me raise my eyebrows. Most of the time she doesn't notice.

I think it just looks like dancing to her. :wah:

I think unusual positions with the groin contact barely concealed is over PG.

But then... what's unusual?

AngelEyes82;590820 wrote: I don't think you should see bare Breasts or Penis'.

Other than that bra and panties/no shirt & Boxers are ok.









(no tighty whiteys):-2


I started this thread so that we could talk about the general topic. Not to continue the specific issue of your avatar. Really. I'm not trying to do an extended version. I think it would be helpful to get a general consensus on what people think is PG.

I think what constitutes PG rating is gonna vary differently with everyone. For me PG is no sexual nudity.

Pinky;590823 wrote: This nude?

http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m84/ ... oon672.jpg


no.

you're more covered than most the girls walking down main street. :p

Sheryl;590825 wrote: I think what constitutes PG rating is gonna vary differently with everyone. For me PG is no sexual nudity.


by sexual you mean implying that they are having sex in any way. yes?

I guess I'm thinking if it looks like something I"m gonna see in Playboy or Penthouse, then I don't wanna see it here.

That's actually an interesting choice, Playboy, because they have a variety of levels of porn in that mag.

Not to start any trouble, cause I'm really not trying to....but this was never removed, and I really thought it would've been....

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showt ... 907&page=3

WonderWendy3;590845 wrote: Not to start any trouble, cause I'm really not trying to....but this was never removed, and I really thought it would've been....

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showt ... 907&page=3


that was a thread link but I presume you mean the photo with the sign.

It's gone now.

At that time there was a lot of similar posting going on and we just kinda gave up. Thanks for the link. I couldn't remember where that was posted.

koan;590844 wrote: That's actually an interesting choice, Playboy, because they have a variety of levels of porn in that mag.


Your right they do, but it's what I thought of when thinking sexual nudity.

Sheryl;590851 wrote: Your right they do, but it's what I thought of when thinking sexual nudity.


I agree with that one. Penthouse is more graphic overall but I always think of Playboy as the line when I see images on FG.

funny, I almost posted a pic of a bat, but it was exposing his "winky woo" and it looked similar to a human....so didn't do it....

I find most of the time people keep in mind where they are posting but we get carried away sometimes.

Most people know I go to another forum where anything and everything goes. When I come here I have to really watch myself with what I'm posting.

Thread titles like "This is my poochie..." should be deterred as vigorously as evident pudenda and stiff nipples, I reckon.

That's a huge area of discussion, getting into written words and not just images.

A scary discussion.

spot;590878 wrote: Thread titles like "This is my poochie..." should be deterred as vigorously as evident pudenda and stiff nipples, I reckon.


Oh God. Spot, did you just say "pudenda?" Could we just say punani? Does anyone even say poontang anymore? Lord. I about spit my drink out. :wah:

Does this mean I can't play in the Innuendo Thread anymore??

spot;590878 wrote: Thread titles like "This is my poochie..." should be deterred as vigorously as evident pudenda and stiff nipples, I reckon.




Ok when I read poochie I thought of a dog...maybe it's just something us southern folks refer to our canine pets as...:-2

RedGlitter;590896 wrote: Lord. I about spit my drink out. :wah:It's only the chance of catching someone off guard that makes it worth trying. Thank you RG.

There's an innuendo thread? I'll have to practice before I dare venture in there.

spot;590900 wrote: It's only the chance of catching someone off guard that makes it worth trying. Thank you RG.

There's an innuendo thread? I'll have to practice before I dare venture in there.


watch out everyone, spots about to let his hair down.

I bet he's better at innuendo than all of us.

Since that thread came up, one of the reasons I started it was so people had a thread to go to when they were feeling spunky and they have to somehow get that into PG words. Figured it would help keep it out of the other threads since some people were complaining.

It's all about finding happy mediums.

I'm a medium. I'm usually happy.

Why can't we all just get along? :p

If Spot's coming around, I think I might have some serious competition. I look forward! Koan, can you post that link please?

Not to get back on topic or anything, but... :p if ya' gotta' ask how nude, then it's too nude! :wah:

Now where were we... something about sexual innuendo or something wasn't it?

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showt ... t=innuendo

somehow this thread didn't go as planned. :wah:

Oh dear... I hope it didn't go off topic... or even worse yet... is TOO PG! :wah:

Wendybird;590985 wrote: Did someone say nude?

:sneaky:


Yes, there was this thread called "Post your Boobies", but... *ahem* it was moved to my PM box, after it was deemed too risqué for the open forum. :wah:

Wendybird;590985 wrote: Did someone say nude?

:sneaky:


bendybird;) :-4

Why is it that women, (who own most of the boobs) have the biggest problem with bare breasts. It doesn't make sense, I mean they see them every day, and they are not a procreating genital. They are merely milk jugs that men enjoy trying to quench their thirsts with so too speak.

YZGI;591149 wrote: Why is it that women, (who own most of the boobs) have the biggest problem with bare breasts. It doesn't make sense, I mean they see them every day, and they are not a procreating genital. They are merely milk jugs that men enjoy trying to quench their thirsts with so too speak.


I have NO problem with bare breasts...just prefer not to see them....:p :p

WonderWendy3;591151 wrote: I have NO problem with bare breasts...just prefer not to see them....:p :p


me either WW3...



not teheeheehee:p

zinkyusa;591157 wrote: me either WW3...



not teheeheehee:p


very funny "Bat-Man".... very funny!!:)

koan;590824 wrote: I think it would be helpful to get a general consensus on what people think is PG.


The Ontario Film Review Board definition :

"Brief nudity in a non-sexual context, non-exploitative close-up."

Sheryl;590897 wrote: Ok when I read poochie I thought of a dog...maybe it's just something us southern folks refer to our canine pets as...:-2


"Half Joe Camel and a third Fonzerelli" :

Attached files

WonderWendy3;591151 wrote: I have NO problem with bare breasts...just prefer not to see them....:p :p


I have no problem with them , as to seeing them , I am keeping my mouth firmly shut

Uncle Fester;591751 wrote: I have no problem with them , as to seeing them , I am keeping my mouth firmly shut


Eyes open and mouth shut or mouth open and eyes shut??? Which do you prefer???:sneaky:

WonderWendy3;591754 wrote: Eyes open and mouth shut or mouth open and eyes shut??? Which do you prefer???:sneaky:
I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I may incriminate myself.

Anyway my OH is watching me :-5