ForumGarden

Pretty serious stuff



____________________

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Three suspects have been arrested in an alleged terror plot targeting New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, a law enforcement official told CNN.

A former JFK Airport employee was among those arrested, the official said.

The FBI and the Joint Terrorist Task Force are to hold a news conference at 1 p.m. to provide details of the arrests and an indictment.

Authorities believe the plot was aimed at ground operations, not airplane flights, the official said.

The official described the suspects as "al Qaeda wannabes" and said one of the suspects is from the Caribbean region.

The case has been developing for a long time, the official said.

Source: www.cnn.com

well at least they cought them, what type of sicko's want to blow up men women and children ,how could it help their cause one tiny bit i will never know :-5 :-5

they may of caught them jimbo but what they do to them ?

Plot to blow up JFK Airport



To what end ?

What then ? Who wins ?

neffy;627293 wrote: they may of caught them jimbo but what they do to them ?




orange suites torture ,who knows





its a delicate balance , murdering scum's rights





or trying to stop murdering scum from mass slaughter of hundreds if not thousands of innocent lives :-3





what do you guys think ??:-3





do indeed these scum even have rights at all?? :-3

jimbo;627295 wrote: orange suites torture ,who knows





its a delicate balance , murdering scum's rights





or trying to stop murdering scum from mass slaughter of hundreds if not thousands of innocent lives :-3





what do you guys think ??:-3





do indeed these scum even have rights at all?? :-3


IMO i think if those people cause mass death & terror to a very busy place such as an airport then they should either spend the rest of their days behind bars or be killed you know Capital Punshiment

Musiclover89;627297 wrote: IMO i think if those people cause mass death & terror to a very busy place such as an airport then they should either spend the rest of their days behind bars or be killed you know Capital Punshiment




but my mj loving buddy





my point is are these men innocent until proven guilty





if we deny this scum their rights are we not taking away their rights and on the way to becoming as uncivilized as they are :-3 :-3







i cant make up my mind







maybe just send in the SAS to wipe them all out ,if the state becomes a murderer are we all not murderes for supporting the state :-2

jimbo;627295 wrote:





what do you guys think ??:-3





do indeed these scum even have rights at all?? :-3


NO. They forfeit any rights they have when they try to pull this stuff.

Or at least that's how it would be in RedGlitter World.

Thanks for the info Darren.

Im so glad it didnt happen.

It is the big news story right now, I am glad they discovered it.

RedGlitter;627302 wrote: NO. They forfeit any rights they have when they try to pull this stuff.

Or at least that's how it would be in RedGlitter World.


without wanting to sound nit picky my friend ,how do you know for sure they are guilty ,i mean where does the burden of proof end





like if they are of a militant religeon does that make them guilty?



how about if they just know other people that preach hate crimes does that prove their guilt ??





its a slippery slope red



i mean if it was your loved one that was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and maybe had a phone number of one of these other suspects on their cell phone is that enough evidence to exicute your loved one ?



innocent till proven guilty that is every humans right





but we all have the right not to be blown to piecec by cowardly murdering scum





its a fine balance my friend and i'm glad i dont have to make the decisions



i mean some of the people in orange suites in that god awfull place g bay are innocent they have been kept away from their loved ones for years and years without any proof what so ever ,they are someones son,brother father ,i would be deverstated if one was a family member of mine





not wanting to fight with any one just my thoughts

Waiting for a news conference now.

my girl is due to fly out of there in a few weeks ,i hope she dont get too worried :-3 :-3

jimbo;627312 wrote: without wanting to sound nit picky my friend ,how do you know for sure they are guilty ,i mean where does the burden of proof end





like if they are of a militant religeon does that make them guilty?



how about if they just know other people that preach hate crimes does that prove their guilt ??





its a slippery slope red



i mean if it was your loved one that was in the wrong place and at the wrong time and maybe had a phone number of one of these other suspects on their cell phone is that enough evidence to exicute your loved one ?



innocent till proven guilty that is every humans right





but we all have the right not to be blown to piecec by cowardly murdering scum





its a fine balance my friend and i'm glad i dont have to make the decisions



i mean some of the people in orange suites in that god awfull place g bay are innocent they have been kept away from their loved ones for years and years without any proof what so ever ,they are someones son,brother father ,i would be deverstated if one was a family member of mine





not wanting to fight with any one just my thoughts


Oh no Jimbo, you are right. If they're innocent, of course nothing should happen to them. I was just thinking that if someone actually was attempting to blow up an airport or some other place where people would wrongfully die, that those responsible should be made to pay. But proof is vital. No proof, no case.

And I didn't think you were fighting. No worries.

RedGlitter;627317 wrote: Oh no Jimbo, you are right. If they're innocent, of course nothing should happen to them. I was just thinking that if someone actually was attempting to blow up an airport or some other place where people would wrongfully die, that those responsible should be made to pay. But proof is vital. No proof, no case.

And I didn't think you were fighting. No worries.




if they are caught red handed so to speak ,then they should have no rights ,torture ,drugs anything to cath the other madmen and to save lives :-3 :-3

I'm still waiting to see what happens to the folks that were supposed to be planning to cut off Stephen Harper's head.

Have to admit I chuckle when I think about it. Keep seeing him as a bobble head dude.

koan;627395 wrote: I'm still waiting to see what happens to the folks that were supposed to be planning to cut off Stephen Harper's head.



Have to admit I chuckle when I think about it. Keep seeing him as a bobble head dude.

jimbo;627399 wrote:


The point, dear jimbo, is that there have been a lot of arrests of people who are said to have been planning to blow things up, cut things off, and steal all our home appliances. What we need do is look to see how many get convincted then make sure our civil liberties are intact.

jimbo;627295 wrote: its a delicate balance , murdering scum's rights





or trying to stop murdering scum from mass slaughter of hundreds if not thousands of innocent lives :-3





what do you guys think ??:-3It's yet another instance in a long line of sting operations. They're crude unethical state-sponsored propaganda with nothing at all to do with justice. Reality starts with a bunch of people totally incapable of what they're eventually accused of trying to achieve. The state comes in saying what do you think you need to get the job done - you want machine guns? We'll get those for you, that's not a problem. Grenades? Easy. It adds to the charges - "attempted to acquire machine guns and grenades". The driving force in these sting-generated "crimes" is the government agency, not the "plotters". The state ends up with the show trial it wants, the headlines it wants, the justification for its policies that it wants.

Why the courts tolerate this sort of posturing, bullying and plain out-and-out manipulation baffles me, other than that the courts are a part of the same corrupt system. All together now - "four legs good, two legs baaaad"."This can destroy the economy of America for some time," Mr Defreitas was alleged to have said. The arrests are the latest in a series of alleged plots targeting American facilities and landmarks.

Six men were arrested last month on charges of plotting to attack Fort Dix army base in the state of New Jersey. Three people were arrested in July last year outside the US in connection with a plan to suicide bomb the tunnel under the Hudson River connecting Manhattan with New Jersey. And in June 2006, seven suspects were charged over an alleged plot to destroy the country's tallest building - the Sears Tower in Chicago. Sting sting sting.

spot;627699 wrote: It's yet another instance in a long line of sting operations. They're crude unethical state-sponsored propaganda with nothing at all to do with justice. Reality starts with a bunch of people totally incapable of what they're eventually accused of trying to achieve. The state comes in saying what do you think you need to get the job done - you want machine guns? We'll get those for you, that's not a problem. Grenades? Easy. It adds to the charges - "attempted to acquire machine guns and grenades". The driving force in these sting-generated "crimes" is the government agency, not the "plotters". The state ends up with the show trial it wants, the headlines it wants, the justification for its policies that it wants.



Why the courts tolerate this sort of posturing, bullying and plain out-and-out manipulation baffles me, other than that the courts are a part of the same corrupt system. All together now - "four legs good, two legs baaaad"."This can destroy the economy of America for some time," Mr Defreitas was alleged to have said. The arrests are the latest in a series of alleged plots targeting American facilities and landmarks.



Six men were arrested last month on charges of plotting to attack Fort Dix army base in the state of New Jersey. Three people were arrested in July last year outside the US in connection with a plan to suicide bomb the tunnel under the Hudson River connecting Manhattan with New Jersey. And in June 2006, seven suspects were charged over an alleged plot to destroy the country's tallest building - the Sears Tower in Chicago. Sting sting sting.


gorden sumner gordan sumner gordon sumner



as usual excellent points my friend :-6

Any new Developments over night?

Other than my declaiming against the entire twisting of the truth to reflect political necessity on the part of the criminal adventurers? Not a lot.

spot;627775 wrote: Other than my declaiming against the entire twisting of the truth to reflect political necessity on the part of the criminal adventurers? Not a lot.




:wah: Spock !

More often than not I have to read each one of the words in your posts very slowly then try to string them all together again very slowly in order to come to some kind of conclusion as to what it means. 94% of the time I fail and give up. This morning Im determined.

I dont care if it takes all week Im going to get "clued"





Damnit !

Nomad;627780 wrote: :wah: Spock !

More often than not I have to read each one of the words in your posts very slowly then try to string them all together again very slowly in order to come to some kind of conclusion as to what it means. 94% of the time I fail and give up. This morning Im determined.

I dont care if it takes all week Im going to get "clued"





Damnit !






:wah: :wah:

jimbo;627803 wrote:




WHOA DUDE !

i think what Spock was implying was that the justice system is merely a puppet for the administration ,as my logical animation clearly defines

You may not agree with me but IMHO terrorists should not be taken alive

Uncle Fester;627848 wrote: You may not agree with me but IMHO terrorists should not be taken alive


good idea unc but how would you know for sure they were terrorists my friend ,dead people cant prove their innocents :-3 :-3

Uncle Fester;627848 wrote: You may not agree with me but IMHO terrorists should not be taken alive :mad:Where does that proposition leave the authors of the "Shock and Awe" tactic, though? Or are we defining "terrorist" into a very small subset of people which carefully excludes them?