'Framed' incidents in the Gospel of Mark
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:30 pm
I’m reading The Last Week by Marcus J. Borg and John Dominic Crossan. It deals with what the Gospels really teach about Jesus’ final days in Jerusalem. I am mulling about the following today:
Mark’s gospel often contains pairs of incidents that are intended to be interpreted in light of one another. These incidents “frame that which Jesus is trying to communicate.
One pair of incidents is Jesus “cursing the fig tree and the “cleansing of the temple when he threw all the moneylenders out.
Beginning frame: When Jesus was going to Jerusalem he was hungry, and when he saw the fig tree and it did not have any fruit on it, he pronounced a curse on it so that it would never bear figs again. Ending frame: Upon leaving Jerusalem, Peter points out that the fig tree he has cursed has withered.
Reading these verses one may puzzle over this type of reaction from Jesus, that is, if you want to take the story realistically rather than symbolically. Jesus knew, as did all the people during this time, that it was not the season for this tree to produce fruit. Therefore, it was symbolic, not a recounting of events.
What the verses about the fig tree, upon entering and leaving Jerusalem, do is “frame the story about the cleansing of the temple. The ‘framing fig tree story’ warns us that the ‘framed temple story’ is not being cleansed, but symbolically destroyed and that, in both cases, the problem is a lack of the “fruit that Jesus expected to be present.
The threat is clear: if God’s temple is used as a place where worship is substituted for justice, God will destroy that temple, since it has become a haven for perpetrators of injustice and a den for robbers. Therefore, if we do not do justice, our display of worship is rejected.
Do you do justice?
Mark’s gospel often contains pairs of incidents that are intended to be interpreted in light of one another. These incidents “frame that which Jesus is trying to communicate.
One pair of incidents is Jesus “cursing the fig tree and the “cleansing of the temple when he threw all the moneylenders out.
Beginning frame: When Jesus was going to Jerusalem he was hungry, and when he saw the fig tree and it did not have any fruit on it, he pronounced a curse on it so that it would never bear figs again. Ending frame: Upon leaving Jerusalem, Peter points out that the fig tree he has cursed has withered.
Reading these verses one may puzzle over this type of reaction from Jesus, that is, if you want to take the story realistically rather than symbolically. Jesus knew, as did all the people during this time, that it was not the season for this tree to produce fruit. Therefore, it was symbolic, not a recounting of events.
What the verses about the fig tree, upon entering and leaving Jerusalem, do is “frame the story about the cleansing of the temple. The ‘framing fig tree story’ warns us that the ‘framed temple story’ is not being cleansed, but symbolically destroyed and that, in both cases, the problem is a lack of the “fruit that Jesus expected to be present.
The threat is clear: if God’s temple is used as a place where worship is substituted for justice, God will destroy that temple, since it has become a haven for perpetrators of injustice and a den for robbers. Therefore, if we do not do justice, our display of worship is rejected.
Do you do justice?