ForumGarden

Communism Has Several Meanings ; It Can Be A Form Of An Econmic System , A Government , A Way Of Life , A Revolutionary Movement , An Ordeal , Or A Goal . Since The Early 20th Century , Its Rise Has Shaped Much Of History . It Has Become One Of The Most Powerful Foeces In The World . According To Communist , Their Long - Range Goal Is A Society That Provides Economic Security And Equality For All .

States Where Communism Is Practiced , Its Rulers Permit Little Public Or Organized Criticism . Communist Leaders Seek . The Aid Of The People , But Don't Really Depend On It To Stay In Power As Officials In Democracies Do . Communist Allows Little Of A Person's Life To Stay Outside The Party's Control . Such A Form Of Government Is Sometimes Described As Totalitarism . The Terms Communist And Socialism Are Often Times Mistaken .

Communists Usually Refer To Their Belief And Goals As '' Socialist '' And Russia's Official Name Is The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics . But Socialism May Or May Not Be Based On The Teachings Of Karl Marx ( A German Social Philosoper ) . But Socialist Beliefs Are Not Based On The Teachings Of V.I Lenin ( A Russian Revolutionary Leader ) Communist Is Based On The Teaching Of Karl Marx And John Lenin .

Communist And Socialist Both Seek Public Ownership Or Control Of The Principle Means Of Production . But Most Socialists Favor Peaceful Methoda To Achieve Their Goals , While Communist Have Offten Been Prepared To Use Force .



The Millennium Book Part One

Conferred By

Supreme Grand Hierophants S.G.H.

720th Degree

Amunnubi Raakhptah ( Atum - Re )

Mir '' Pyramid '' No 9

To Be CONTINUE In Next Post

It's funny how their so called, "Long - Range Goal Is A Society That Provides Economic Security And Equality For All." Taking away freedom of choice, speech, religion, etc., can't and never will be "equality for all." Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all.

Daniyal;1166042 wrote: Communism Has Several Meanings ; It Can Be A Form Of An Econmic System , A Government , A Way Of Life , A Revolutionary Movement , An Ordeal , Or A Goal . Since The Early 20th Century , Its Rise Has Shaped Much Of History . It Has Become One Of The Most Powerful Foeces In The World . According To Communist , Their Long - Range Goal Is A Society That Provides Economic Security And Equality For All .

States Where Communism Is Practiced , Its Rulers Permit Little Public Or Organized Criticism . Communist Leaders Seek . The Aid Of The People , But Don't Really Depend On It To Stay In Power As Officials In Democracies Do . Communist Allows Little Of A Person's Life To Stay Outside The Party's Control . Such A Form Of Government Is Sometimes Described As Totalitarism . The Terms Communist And Socialism Are Often Times Mistaken .

Communists Usually Refer To Their Belief And Goals As '' Socialist '' And Russia's Official Name Is The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics . But Socialism May Or May Not Be Based On The Teachings Of Karl Marx ( A German Social Philosoper ) . But Socialist Beliefs Are Not Based On The Teachings Of V.I Lenin ( A Russian Revolutionary Leader ) Communist Is Based On The Teaching Of Karl Marx And John Lenin .

Communist And Socialist Both Seek Public Ownership Or Control Of The Principle Means Of Production . But Most Socialists Favor Peaceful Methoda To Achieve Their Goals , While Communist Have Offten Been Prepared To Use Force .



The Millennium Book Part One

Conferred By

Supreme Grand Hierophants S.G.H.

720th Degree

Amunnubi Raakhptah ( Atum - Re )

Mir '' Pyramid '' No 9

To Be CONTINUE In Next Post


:-3

Don't drink and post.

joey2000;1270580 wrote: :-3

Don't drink and post.


Don't jump to conclusions and make accusations

Daniyal was as (s)he was and needed no drink to get there.

ha my bad

ekotter;1236131 wrote: It's funny how their so called, "Long - Range Goal Is A Society That Provides Economic Security And Equality For All." Taking away freedom of choice, speech, religion, etc., can't and never will be "equality for all." Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all.


How does "Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all" differ in any way from "communism"?

I can just as easily say "Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all" in response to say, capitalism and could apply just as adequately

Communism - Criticisms of communism can be divided in two broad categories: Those concerning themselves with the practical aspects of 20th century Communist states and those concerning themselves with communist principles and theory. Although they often overlap, these two categories are logically distinct.define: communism - Google Search

The morals of those in power dictates the definition of "equality" in response to communism

If I were personally in charge of any state, emphasizing a communist ideology, all the while insuring that all income received by the state were divided equally among all of my states' citizens, and one has the tenacity to suggest this isn't "equal rights"? I couldn't think of anything more equal

I couldn't think of anything more compassionate than to ensure all of the worlds resources were divided equally among all people whom lived on Earth

How on God's green, and FANTASTIC I might add, Earth could you or anyone be against that?

K.Snyder;1271133 wrote: How does "Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all" differ in any way from "communism"?

I can just as easily say "Without a free government run by the people, there will never be equality for all" in response to say, capitalism and could apply just as adequately

define: communism - Google Search

The morals of those in power dictates the definition of "equality" in response to communism

If I were personally in charge of any state, emphasizing a communist ideology, all the while insuring that all income received by the state were divided equally among all of my states' citizens, and one has the tenacity to suggest this isn't "equal rights"? I couldn't think of anything more equal

I couldn't think of anything more compassionate than to ensure all of the worlds resources were divided equally among all people whom lived on Earth

How on God's green, and FANTASTIC I might add, Earth could you or anyone be against that?


Albeit a rather cynical approach but considering the world sees one too many persons in need I think it's distinctively appropriate