Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:06 pm
It looks as though Mr. Quick has been rather dense.
You must elaborate for us.
Please.
Attached files
Page 1 of 1
Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:45 pm
Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:21 pm
Twelve Men Arrested As Part Of Counter-Terrorism Operation Across North West Of England | UK News | Sky News
Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:37 pm
Thank you, dubs. 
"And what exactly are those documents you are carrying? Yeah, the ones with CLASSIFIED stamped in red on the front envelope. Just names and addresses of whom?...........Nobody we would know?........Oh. "
"And what exactly are those documents you are carrying? Yeah, the ones with CLASSIFIED stamped in red on the front envelope. Just names and addresses of whom?...........Nobody we would know?........Oh. "
Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:35 pm
dubs;1171981 wrote: Twelve Men Arrested As Part Of Counter-Terrorism Operation Across North West Of England | UK News | Sky News At least he never left it on the train 
Bob Quick.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Hey I need those for my blt:yh_rotfl
Bob Quick.
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:44 am
along-for-the-ride;1172005 wrote: "And what exactly are those documents you are carrying? Yeah, the ones with CLASSIFIED stamped in red on the front envelope. Just names and addresses of whom?...........Nobody we would know?........Oh. "
I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?
I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?
Bob Quick.
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:36 am
Bill Sikes;1172177 wrote: I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid? He's quit:
Terror Police Chief Bob Quick Steps Down Over Security Blunder | UK News | Sky News
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid? He's quit:
Terror Police Chief Bob Quick Steps Down Over Security Blunder | UK News | Sky News
Bob Quick.
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:26 pm
Bill Sikes;1172177 wrote: I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?
No, there are no excuses for him. His action was very unprofessional, and stupid.
I was mocking him.
The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.
Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?
No, there are no excuses for him. His action was very unprofessional, and stupid.
I was mocking him.
Bob Quick.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:59 pm
Terror raids: nine men released - Telegraph
Lots of unanswered questions, though.
Lots of unanswered questions, though.
Bob Quick.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:43 pm
Bill Sikes;1178495 wrote: Terror raids: nine men released - Telegraph
Lots of unanswered questions, though.
Well, it racked up the tension another notch so I guess it succeeded.
Lots of unanswered questions, though.
Well, it racked up the tension another notch so I guess it succeeded.