ForumGarden

I for one thought this was done and gone.............

Nation & World | Supreme Court revives case of Janet Jackson's televised "wardrobe malfunction" | Seattle Times Newspaper

But it seems not.While not wishing to bring up bad mammaries how puritanical can the courts get? It happened in 2004 and lasted 9/16 of a second so shouldn't they let it go. A supreme waste of tax money and court time.

FUBAR;1183888 wrote: I for one thought this was done and gone.............

Nation & World | Supreme Court revives case of Janet Jackson's televised "wardrobe malfunction" | Seattle Times Newspaper

But it seems not.While not wishing to bring up bad mammaries how puritanical can the courts get? It happened in 2004 and lasted 9/16 of a second so shouldn't they let it go. A supreme waste of tax money and court time.


Completely ridiculous waste of taxpayer money is right on. I watch tv all the time and they are always saying the A word (arsehole):wah: big friggin deal. Yeah, I saw the superbowl that year...personally I think if I had tivo'd it...I would have seen it, but it was really fast and caught a glimpse of JJ's boob.:rolleyes:. Big effing deal, women breastfeed in public all the time...no biggie.