ForumGarden

The story of paying attention to detail.

A pathologist has a group of students under-going training.

On their first day, the pathologist un-viels a corpse ready for disection.

He stresses to his students how important it is to observe everything he does in the most detail.

He tells his class to pay attention and with that, rams his finger up the corpse's rectum, places his finger in his mouth and sucks hard.

He then tells every student to repeat what he has just done.

After they have all finished, he reminds them that he told them to pay great attention to his actions.

He tells them 'As you should have observed, I placed my Index finger in the corpse rectum and sucked my MIDDLE finger !!!

15 students fainted.

oscar;1251905 wrote: The story of paying attention to detail.

A pathologist has a group of students under-going training.

On their first day, the pathologist un-viels a corpse ready for disection.

He stresses to his students how important it is to observe everything he does in the most detail.

He tells his class to pay attention and with that, rams his finger up the corpse's rectum, places his finger in his mouth and sucks hard.

He then tells every student to repeat what he has just done.

After they have all finished, he reminds them that he told them to pay great attention to his actions.

He tells them 'As you should have observed, I placed my Index finger in the corpse rectum and sucked my MIDDLE finger !!!

15 students fainted.


Thank you for this enlightening story. I just ate my beef & beans for dinner, which should be coming up any minute now.:yh_sick

hoppy;1251912 wrote: Thank you for this enlightening story. I just ate my beef & beans for dinner, which should be coming up any minute now.:yh_sick :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

oscar;1251905 wrote: The story of paying attention to detail.

A pathologist has a group of students under-going training.

On their first day, the pathologist un-viels a corpse ready for disection.

He stresses to his students how important it is to observe everything he does in the most detail.

He tells his class to pay attention and with that, rams his finger up the corpse's rectum, places his finger in his mouth and sucks hard.

He then tells every student to repeat what he has just done.

After they have all finished, he reminds them that he told them to pay great attention to his actions.

He tells them 'As you should have observed, I placed my Index finger in the corpse rectum and sucked my MIDDLE finger !!!

15 students fainted.




OMG!



ewwwwwwwwwwwww!:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

oscar;1251905 wrote: The story of paying attention to detail.



A pathologist has a group of students under-going training.



On their first day, the pathologist un-viels a corpse ready for disection.



He stresses to his students how important it is to observe everything he does in the most detail.



He tells his class to pay attention and with that, rams his finger up the corpse's rectum, places his finger in his mouth and sucks hard.



He then tells every student to repeat what he has just done.



After they have all finished, he reminds them that he told them to pay great attention to his actions.



He tells them 'As you should have observed, I placed my Index finger in the corpse rectum and sucked my MIDDLE finger !!!



15 students fainted.
Yep...sounds about right! :yh_laugh

I'm struggling with the word "true" at the moment.

James Robertson Justice is hovering at the back of my mind.

spot;1251930 wrote: I'm struggling with the word "true" at the moment.

James Robertson Justice is hovering at the back of my mind. Lighten up and get groovy Spot. It's for entertainment not nit picking.

oscar;1251937 wrote: Lighten up and get groovy Spot. It's for entertainment not nit picking.


How does the "true" add to the entertainment?

Really, it often puzzles me, it would be a kindness for you to explain it just this once.

spot;1251940 wrote: How does the "true" add to the entertainment?

Really, it often puzzles me, it would be a kindness for you to explain it just this once. I was assured by the person who told me that it was true. That's good enough for me.

oscar;1251945 wrote: I was assured by the person who told me that it was true. That's good enough for me.


Daily Mail - explains a lot :yh_rotfl

oscar;1251945 wrote: I was assured by the person who told me that it was true. That's good enough for me.


That just labels you transparently gullible if you're being serious and vacuously uncooperative if you're not. http://www.snopes.com/college/medical/urine.asp traces the story back to around 1880 and says they've no idea how much further back it might have started.

Seriously, why abuse the concept of "true" in the context of humour? What does it add? People are for ever doing it, you just did it, an explanation of why would help a lot. Is it an intensifier? Can anyone be so asinine as to believe the word in any literal sense when it's used this way? If nobody could be that stupid, how does it intensify anything?

spot;1251950 wrote: That just labels you transparently gullible if you're being serious and vacuously uncooperative if you're not. snopes.com: Urine Test traces the story back to around 1880 and says they've no idea how much further back it might have started.



Seriously, why abuse the concept of "true" in the context of humour? What does it add? People are for ever doing it, you just did it, an explanation of why would help a lot. Is it an intensifier? Can anyone be so asinine as to believe the word in any literal sense when it's used this way? If nobody could be that stupid, how does it intensify anything?
Oh truley! Personally I think it harks back to convincing your parent you arent telling porkies. Only time it is used as an intensifier. Truely!

spot;1251950 wrote: That just labels you transparently gullible if you're being serious and vacuously uncooperative if you're not. snopes.com: Urine Test traces the story back to around 1880 and says they've no idea how much further back it might have started.

Seriously, why abuse the concept of "true" in the context of humour? What does it add? People are for ever doing it, you just did it, an explanation of why would help a lot. Is it an intensifier? Can anyone be so asinine as to believe the word in any literal sense when it's used this way? If nobody could be that stupid, how does it intensify anything?
Why are you so miserable? Why can't you just enjoy a humourous story without having to pull the poster to pieces? There are millions of urban myths in this world... do we have to prove their authenticity just for you to nit pick? I found it funny, others found it funny, so why can't you just lighten up? My reference to the story being true or untrue is less annoying to you than you are to me at feeding your ego on folk's threads. It was a bit of fun... All you do is deter other members from posting some entertainment for fear of being pulled to pices by you. Go and pick the wings off a crane fly instead !!!

oscar;1251980 wrote: Why are you so miserable? Why can't you just enjoy a humourous story without having to pull the poster to pieces? There are millions of urban myths in this world... do we have to prove their authenticity just for you to nit pick? I found it funny, others found it funny, so why can't you just lighten up? My reference to the story being true or untrue is less annoying to you than you are to me at feeding your ego on folk's threads. It was a bit of fun... All you do is deter other members from posting some entertainment for fear of being pulled to pices by you. Go and pick the wings off a crane fly instead !!!
LOL! He's getting worse.:yh_rotfl

oscar;1251980 wrote: Why are you so miserable? Why can't you just enjoy a humourous story without having to pull the poster to pieces?Because it was a bloody disgusting shitawful story with no redeeming merit whatever, least of all in terms of humour. If you found it even remotely amusing it says a lot about the state of your mind and if you genuinely thought it was true you're as mad as a plateful of beetroot.

Raven;1251981 wrote: LOL! He's getting worse.:yh_rotfl
Is that really possible? :sneaky: :wah:

spot;1251986 wrote: Because it was a bloody disgusting shitawful story with no redeeming merit whatever, least of all in terms of humour. If you found it even remotely amusing it says a lot about the state of your mind and if you genuinely thought it was true you're as mad as a plateful of beetroot. To end this futile babble with you, I shall quote my teenage niece:

WHATEVER

You know, I bet she lacks your charisma

and I bet she has less overall charm

and it's quite likely she can't compete at Mensa qualification tests

but maybe she's still as much a dance floor magnet as I am.

If not for mister Peter, I would swear you two had to be married..

:-4:-4:-4

spot;1252110 wrote:

:-4:-4:-4




:eek: Smilie Abuse by Spot ??

Someone call an ambulance, he must be really ill ! :wah:

spot;1252110 wrote:

:-4:-4:-4




I don't believe what I am seeing.

spot;1252110 wrote:

:-4:-4:-4






:-2 :-2 :-2 :-2 :-2





Victor Meldrew from 'One Foot In The Grave'


Well he said "I don't believe it !" But it is there for all to see !!!!! Spot you just ain't feelin' yerself, good sir ! I would have a lie down, if I was you !

Betty Boop;1252133 wrote: Smilie Abuse by Spot ??

Someone call an ambulance, he must be really ill ! :wah:


It's the medication.

spot;1252104 wrote: You know, I bet she lacks your charisma

and I bet she has less overall charm

and it's quite likely she can't compete at Mensa qualification tests

but maybe she's still as much a dance floor magnet as I am. YOU ??? A dance floor magnet ??? For what ??? Fluff ???

spot;1251940 wrote: How does the "true" add to the entertainment?



Really, it often puzzles me, it would be a kindness for you to explain it just this once.


Go get her Tiger. If it smells like a dead fish its probably a dead fish. You see what Im getting at here?

Nomad;1252339 wrote: Go get her Tiger. If it smells like a dead fish its probably a dead fish. You see what Im getting at here?


Posters build avoidance strategies when it comes to discussing matters they're unwilling to focus on. It's sheer rudeness. I asked a perfectly legitimate question and got the traditional rebuff instead of a rational discussion. A rational discussion would be so much more interesting.

spot;1252344 wrote: Posters build avoidance strategies when it comes to discussing matters they're unwilling to focus on. It's sheer rudeness. I asked a perfectly legitimate question and got the traditional rebuff instead of a rational discussion. A rational discussion would be so much more interesting.




I'm not a real big fan of rational. Its overrated.

Nomad;1252347 wrote: I'm not a real big fan of rational. Its overrated. Nor me... It's all you hear of... rational this...rational that... I'm up to here with rational. I'm going to be unrational.

oscar;1252353 wrote: Nor me... It's all you hear of... rational this...rational that... I'm up to here with rational. I'm going to be unrational.


Yes. You start doing that.

nomad;1252354 wrote: yes. You start doing that. q ??