ForumGarden

The reaction to the two terrorist attacks during the last week in December is puzzling. One of the attacks, against a CIA outpost in Afghanistan, succeeded; the other, on an airplane landing in Detroit, failed. The Undiebomber was an amateur who was thwarted, rather neatly, by his fellow passengers on the plane.

The Afghanistan operation was quite the opposite - highly sophisticated and

devastating, with vast implications for both the war in Afghanistan and future clandestine CIA operations. And yet the Undiebomber has provoked an avalanche of attention in our twittery media - and from Republicans like Dick Cheney who yearn for the return of "enhanced" interrogation techniques. The Afghanistan attack hasn't caused nearly the public fuss, but make no mistake: it has to be a matter of much greater concern to the White House than the Detroit fiasco. (See a pictorial history of the CIA.)

Story Link: The CIA Double-Cross: How Bad a Blow in Afghanistan? - Yahoo! News

It's a trivial irrelevance to the CIA once they wipe the embarrassment off their faces. I hope nobody thinks they don't infiltrate anti-American groups in exactly the same way, with an identical intent. There's no moral high ground involved on either side of this.