Page 1 of 1

Tony Blair where are the weapons of mass destruction?

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:06 pm
by David813
Blair is Bush's little lap dog. He'll bark when Bush says bark! And he'll roll over when Bush says roll over. New Labor Liars Out of Office. Revive Kinnock.

Tony Blair where are the weapons of mass destruction?

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:03 pm
by abbey
indigo19 wrote: Tony Blair where are the weapons of mass destruction?



Tony Blair lied about weapons of mass destruction.



And because of Tony Blair lies, British soldiers have died.Feel better now you've got that off yer chest?

Tony Blair where are the weapons of mass destruction?

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:52 pm
by Der Wulf
Scrat wrote: There have been many lies told by Blair and his master Shrub.



The weapons of mass distraction were destroyed shortly after the first Gulf war, what little there was.



Al Qaida is not a threat, the only reason they accomplished what they did was because of simple American stupidity and lax PC sheepish thinking that still haunts us.



The invasion of Iraq was to secure oil reserves. The Afghan invasion was to sooth the American ego.



Neither war will be over in "less than a decade", ides of the Israeli/Palistinian conflict.
Hope you and your buds sleep well tonight in the blissful fog of ignorance and irresponsibility. :(

Tony Blair where are the weapons of mass destruction?

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:14 am
by Bothwell
Revive Kinnock!!!!!

Kinnochio is now busy lining his pockets at the EU in Brussels as is his lovely wife Glenys. The Welsh windbag lost Labour an election with his stupid granstanding at an election rally. He was succeeded by John Smith possible one of the greates PM's we never had.

Let's just posit a thought here, I have no doubt that Mr Blur lied to us about WMD, so what if it was just about oil. If the west knew it was going to run out of oil reserves soon and there were billions of barrels of it in countries like Iraq what should we do.

Would American and British household go back to walking and cooking over wood with no power and light whilst Iraqis had everything they needed. no we would not, so if it was about oil and as a consequence ridding the world of a despot then just tell me that.