Any legal eagles here?
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:35 pm
There Is a right old to do that unfortunately my position leaves me the one to try and find a solution.
The story In brief....
A year ago, a printer was loaned to a member of a local branch of a political party. Not any old printer but thousands of pounds worth of kit that churns out 1,000 an hour.
This woman holds no official position In the party but as I do, I could be responsible for It's non return.
The fundholder of the local branch has sent 4 polite written requests for It's return only for her to say she needs It herself to promote the party but this Is holding back other area's who need the use of It.
Last week, a parallel party was formed by disgruntled ex members of this political party but In effect still under the umbrella of the original party.... waiting for the day the Chairman of the original party Implodes.... are you following?
At this meeting, this woman swore her alliegence to the parallel party and wants nothing more than the downfall of the original parties chairman.
She has just replied to a 5th request for the printer to be returned stating she Is keeping It because she needs It to promote the parallel party.
This means that the original parties Fundholder Is financially liable for It's loss and at his age, he doesn't need this.
I have written to her officially yesterday telling her that she holds no official position In the original party nor the parallel party and It was loaned to her In good faith by the original party, there-fore It can not be legally used for a parallel party.... still following?
On advice from the police, I have been advised that this Is theft and the moment I say so, they will visit her.
I don't want to do this but the question Is, who legally owns the printer?
The story In brief....
A year ago, a printer was loaned to a member of a local branch of a political party. Not any old printer but thousands of pounds worth of kit that churns out 1,000 an hour.
This woman holds no official position In the party but as I do, I could be responsible for It's non return.
The fundholder of the local branch has sent 4 polite written requests for It's return only for her to say she needs It herself to promote the party but this Is holding back other area's who need the use of It.
Last week, a parallel party was formed by disgruntled ex members of this political party but In effect still under the umbrella of the original party.... waiting for the day the Chairman of the original party Implodes.... are you following?
At this meeting, this woman swore her alliegence to the parallel party and wants nothing more than the downfall of the original parties chairman.
She has just replied to a 5th request for the printer to be returned stating she Is keeping It because she needs It to promote the parallel party.
This means that the original parties Fundholder Is financially liable for It's loss and at his age, he doesn't need this.
I have written to her officially yesterday telling her that she holds no official position In the original party nor the parallel party and It was loaned to her In good faith by the original party, there-fore It can not be legally used for a parallel party.... still following?
On advice from the police, I have been advised that this Is theft and the moment I say so, they will visit her.
I don't want to do this but the question Is, who legally owns the printer?