ForumGarden

Do you think he will take the money?

» SAVAGE OFFERS GINGRICH $1 MILLION TO DROP OUT OF THE RACE — WILL ANNOUNCE ON SHOW TODAY

I do hope not, that's the chap I want to see elected President next year.

OP Link wrote: Newt Gingrich is unelectable. Mitt Romney is the only candidate with a chance of defeating Barack Obama, and there is nothing more important than that for future health, safety, and security of the United States of America.Trading one status quo Republicrat for another will do nothing. Less than a band-aid, it's no more than blowing on a wound to make it feel better. Mitt, Newt, and Barry are all big gov't corporate puppets. Switch one out for the other all day long and nothing will change but the name plates.

My word that's a lying little website Mr Savage has there. He has the text "Did a U.S. double-agent send Iran this spy plane?" on a link to a Fox News story "U.S. Military Sources: Iran Has Missing U.S. Drone" which makes no hint of any such speculation despite the implication that Fox is asking the question. What a nasty prat Mr Savage is, I'm glad he's barred from entry to the UK.

spot;1378365 wrote: I do hope not, that's the chap I want to see elected President next year.


Why?

Lon;1378368 wrote: Why?As the fastest route to a permanent US policy of isolationism I can think of. Who else would be more polarizing, both within the US and beyond its borders? If we're really lucky he'll trigger off another trillion dollar invasion of some backwater. Maybe the Philippines. Maybe he'll totally screw up and invade Taiwan.

While we're at it I'll make you a thirty year prediction that the US will annexe Canada as a dependency before 2040, refusing statehood or citizenship but confiscating the resources and imposing a Supreme Commander to run the country, and that it will be people like Gingrich who make it happen in a desperate attempt to retain US solvency.

spot;1378371 wrote: As the fastest route to a permanent US policy of isolationism I can think of. Who else would be more polarizing, both within the US and beyond its borders? If we're really lucky he'll trigger off another trillion dollar invasion of some backwater. Maybe the Philippines. Maybe he'll totally screw up and invade Taiwan.

While we're at it I'll make you a thirty year prediction that the US will annexe Canada as a dependency before 2040, refusing statehood or citizenship but confiscating the resources and imposing a Supreme Commander to run the country, and that it will be people like Gingrich who make it happen in a desperate attempt to retain US solvency..


Canadians had better be learning to speak Spanish then, because by 2040 that will be the National Language. Se habla Espanol?

I was thinking of learning Mandarin.

I like oranges.

Accountable;1378388 wrote: I like oranges.


You're a Cutie.

I think Gingrich is an imagined person.

US won't annex Canada! With our new Ethical Oil Sands, we're going to take over the world as the next Saudi Arabia. If they want our pipeline they'll bow down and kiss our grits.

The US has, if I recall, a series of amendments to its Constitution?

I have a new amendment, if someone would care to pass it on to their representative for consideration. It's in the interests of the country, as well as the rest of us.Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the American people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.

(2) To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.

There are bonus marks for recognizing who wrote it and why.

Lon;1378378 wrote: Canadians had better be learning to speak Spanish then, because by 2040 that will be the National Language. Se habla Espanol?


The language of the underclass is of interest only to those who make up the underclass, it has no effect on the minority who run the country. I don't think you'll be reading the Congressional Record in any language other than the local dialect you mistakenly describe as English.

koan;1378392 wrote: I think Gingrich is an imagined person.

US won't annex Canada! With our new Ethical Oil Sands, we're going to take over the world as the next Saudi Arabia. If they want our pipeline they'll bow down and kiss our grits.
Are Canadian grits anything like Canadian bacon? If so, I'll have to pass, thanks. :yh_wink

The last time the USA invaded Canada it didn't go so well, did it? Wasn't that the little war that ended with the burning of the (not yet named) White House? (There were a few scuffles back then. I may be confusing them)

spot;1378407 wrote: The language of the underclass is of interest only to those who make up the underclass, it has no effect on the minority who run the country. I don't think you'll be reading the Congressional Record in any language other than the local dialect you mistakenly describe as English.


By the year 2040 the minority that run the country will be Hispanic and the Congressional Record will be in Spanish. Think not? If you are Caucasian and live in California at present, you are less than 50 % of the population.

Lon;1378435 wrote: If you are Caucasian and live in California at present, you are less than 50 % of the population.


But you're far and away the rich bunch. By, I would guess, at least a factor of ten. And it's the rich what do the governing. I think you're quite right about the demographics and entirely wrong about who governs in America.

spot;1378438 wrote: But you're far and away the rich bunch. By, I would guess, at least a factor of ten. And it's the rich what do the governing. I think you're quite right about the demographics and entirely wrong about who governs in America.


Don't under estimate the growth of Hispanic wealth & influence, it's growing as is the ever increasing wealth of the Asian community.

Who knows then, perhaps they'll bring some much-needed sanity to the froth-lipped bastions of recent White House administrations. Maybe they'll decriminalize the drug trade to start with. Newt's not likely to.

spot;1378438 wrote: But you're far and away the rich bunch. By, I would guess, at least a factor of ten. And it's the rich what do the governing. I think you're quite right about the demographics and entirely wrong about who governs in America.


I think Hispanic and Asian are the two cultural groups in America with the brightest future at the moment. Although I'm impressed with the kids coming out of Indian homes too.

Come to think of it, pretty much anyone that isn't black or white is showing the most potential at the moment, IMO.

spot;1378446 wrote: Who knows then, perhaps they'll bring some much-needed sanity to the froth-lipped bastions of recent White House administrations. Maybe they'll decriminalize the drug trade to start with. Newt's not likely to.


But if you decriminalize the drug trade it will curtail the financial growth of a good part of the Hispanic community. B:wah: