ForumGarden

When Jesus said he is the alpha ( 1st ) & omega ( last ), he was actually referring himself to a radioactive atom (spirit-soul) whose nuclei has spontaneously disintegrated & emitted alpha particles or electromagnetic rays during the process ( alpha decay )& Resurrection as an Omega ( baryon )-a subatomic hadron particle which have the symbols Ω



Jesus was trying to tell us that we are radioactive atoms (spirit-souls) which have decayed into the human form, aquatic animals, birds, etc after thousands of years of emitting alpha, beta & gamma rays.



Here`s an example how a 238U is transformed with a half live of 4.5 billion years to another atomic particle (thorium-234 )when it spontaneously emitted an alpha ray.



The natural decay chain of 238U,

decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 4.5 billion years to thorium-234

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 24 days to protactinium-234

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 1.2 minutes to uranium-234

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 240 thousand years to thorium-230

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 77 thousand years to radium-226

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 1.6 thousand years to radon-222

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 3.8 days to polonium-218

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 3.1 minutes to lead-214

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 27 minutes to bismuth-214

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 20 minutes to polonium-214

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 160 microseconds to lead-210

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 22 years to bismuth-210

which decays, through beta-emission, with a half-life of 5 days to polonium-210

which decays, through alpha-emission, with a half-life of 140 days to lead-206, which is a stable nuclide.

Similarly when a man dies his soul ( an atomic particle) decays or migrates from one atom ( specie ) to another atom ( specie ) depending on the quality of the radiation it emitted from its past half life. Take a look at bismuth-210 with a half life of 22 days decays, through beta emission, with a half life of 5 days to polonium-210 which decays, through alpha emission, with a half life of 140 days to lead-206, a stable atom. But when a stable or dead atom transforms or becomes unstable emitting spontaneously an alpha, beta or gamma ray it`s called birth (reincarnation).

The alpha & omega of Jesus supports reincarnation & negates Darwin`s Theory of Evolution.



If God ( Om ) is an atomic particle emitting spontaneously (without cause ) an alpha ray. With a half life of billions of years, God transformed itself into another atomic particle emitting alpha, beta & gamma rays with a half life of 250,000 years. The result of these emissions activated stable (dead or dormant ) atoms into unstable ones and emitting alpha or beta rays as well decaying with a half life between 60-120 years transformed into a human being ( Caucasian, Asian, African, etc).

In other words, reincarnation is the transmigration of the soul in English. In Latin it means, " entering the flesh, " after death either as human being, animal or plant indicating the continuity of the soul not the flesh. In radioactive decay of atoms, emissions of alpha , beta or gamma rays from an atom say uranium-238 signifies it`s ageing with a half life of 4.5 billion years. That it has metamorphosed ( in the end ) to thorium-234, so on and so forth. If the soul is an atomic particle that has acquired a new body. My problem is I still do not have any information as to what atomic particle or nuclei an animal or human being represents.Humans and animals I realized if based on the alpha & omega theory are not evolving but transmigrating and mutating.

For example, a butterfly may produce offspring with new mutations. The majority of these mutations will have no effect; but one might change the color of one of the butterfly's offspring, making it harder (or easier) for predators to see. If this color change is advantageous, the chance of this butterfly surviving and producing its own offspring are a little better, and over time the number of butterflies with this mutation may form a larger percentage of the population. ( Taken from Wikipedia/ Mutation )

If God is an atomic particle (Om) emitting alpha ray spontaneously ( without cause ) God therefore can manifest itself in unlimited forms considering that God has no material body. A decaying atomic particle when it finally manifest a material form at birth say a human body, the evidence of the soul`s presence in the human body as an atomic particle can be proven by looking at an x-ray film of a human being. The picture you see on the x-ray film high lighted by radium is the soul`s consciousness ( radiation that has taken a form ). The origin of this consciousness according to the Vedic scriptures is the soul ( atomic particle ) located within the heart of everyone. Consciousness in other words is the (effulgence) emitted by a decaying atom which have transformed into another atomic form at birth. If however an atomic particle spontaneously ( without a cause ) emits an alpha rad ( Krishna/Christ consciousness ) at birth. The material form most likely it will acquire is an AVATAR

Using an alpha particle as a metaphor to god might be great but why not just call god a helium nucleus? What do we call the particles that are smaller than the alpha particle and is the alpha particle simply used because of it's significance to the Latin alphabet?

rajakrsna;1387304 wrote: My problem is I still do not have any information as to what atomic particle or nuclei an animal or human being represents.
I think that's the least of your worries.

A lot of that post reflects the writings of Annie Besant, though you may not have seen any of her works. If you haven't then she might give you further insight.

spot;1387325 wrote: I think that's the least of your worries.

A lot of that post reflects the writings of Annie Besant, though you may not have seen any of her works. If you haven't then she might give you further insight.


All I know at a science forum the staff gives you a monicker. If new, a lepton, less new a quark, much older a baryon so on so forth.

K.Snyder;1387316 wrote: Using an alpha particle as a metaphor to god might be great but why not just call god a helium nucleus? What do we call the particles that are smaller than the alpha particle and is the alpha particle simply used because of it's significance to the Latin alphabet?


Well, if you could provide a diagram of helium similar to 238u I posted and how helium transforms itself when it decays emitting the so-called alpha rad, beta and gamma. If helium decays, what atomic particle it`d be next?

rajakrsna;1387363 wrote: Well, if you could provide a diagram of helium similar to 238u I posted and how helium transforms itself when it decays emitting the so-called alpha rad, beta and gamma. If helium decays, what atomic particle it`d be next?


Helium is an alpha particle, it can't decay, it fuses. Anything lighter than iron fuses until it gets to be iron, anything heavier than iron decays until it gets to be iron. The binding energy of iron is the least per nucleon that it's possible to get, so it's what elements move toward being.

You do all realise that you're talking to a funny hat person?

fuzzywuzzy;1387393 wrote: You do all realise that you're talking to a funny hat person?


The photo was taken last July 11 at the wedding reception of my brother-in-law. Beside me is my daughter, Melsa Reina. She`ll be graduating from the nursing course next month. She`s our youngest child. Older than her is Marco Nino, a registered nurse presently working in UK. The eldest is Matthew- an electronic communications engineer.

spot;1387367 wrote: Helium is an alpha particle, it can't decay, it fuses. Anything lighter than iron fuses until it gets to be iron, anything heavier than iron decays until it gets to be iron. The binding energy of iron is the least per nucleon that it's possible to get, so it's what elements move toward being.


Iron is a component of hemoglobin found in the human red blood cell. So what about oxygen does it become an iron, too, once it attaches with hemoglobin?

rajakrsna;1387422 wrote: Iron is a component of hemoglobin found in the human red blood cell. So what about oxygen does it become an iron, too, once it attaches with hemoglobin?


Perhaps, if a nurse were to infuse an unfortunate with enough blood at a rate fast enough to create nuclear fusion, although you might get a much bigger mess than what's worth it, I'd think.

Go with the quark ... I know I would but my lack of faith includes me out!

rajakrsna;1387422 wrote: Iron is a component of hemoglobin found in the human red blood cell. So what about oxygen does it become an iron, too, once it attaches with hemoglobin?


Excuse me but, apart from the totally coincidental link you're making, you do realise that we were talking nuclear interaction and you're now talking chemical linkage?

rajakrsna;1387422 wrote: Iron is a component of hemoglobin found in the human red blood cell. So what about oxygen does it become an iron, too, once it attaches with hemoglobin?


No nuclear fusion ever occurs outside of a working sun or a physicist's fusion reactor. Nuclear fission, which you started out with in the opening post, does occur naturally wherever the heavy radioactive atoms exist. Nuclear fusion has never been seen in any natural setting like, for example, a blood cell.

Helena Blavatsky drew diagrams of elements as resonating strings long before any scientist was aware of the existence of an internal atomic structure. Her descriptions have a lot in common with your thinking. I mentioned her later Theosophist co-worker Annie Besant earlier but I was recalling the wrong woman.

spot;1387508 wrote: No nuclear fusion ever occurs outside of a working sun or a physicist's fusion reactor. Nuclear fission, which you started out with in the opening post, does occur naturally wherever the heavy radioactive atoms exist. Nuclear fusion has never been seen in any natural setting like, for example, a blood cell.

Helena Blavatsky drew diagrams of elements as resonating strings long before any scientist was aware of the existence of an internal atomic structure. Her descriptions have a lot in common with your thinking. I mentioned her later Theosophist co-worker Annie Besant earlier but I was recalling the wrong woman.


Thank you for the information regarding nuclear fission. But can a person like Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu ( 1486-1534 ) a Vaishnava philosopher who was considered by his followers to be Krishna himself split into two as Radha & Krishna witnessed by his friend, Ramananda Raya. In fact, when Ramananda saw this he fainted. Sri Caitanya then returned to his normal appearance & said to Ramananda not tell this to anyone. In the book The Teachings of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu, it is said that Krishna incarnated as Radhakrishna to learn more about his internal potency-Radha,

Bryn Mawr;1387485 wrote: Excuse me but, apart from the totally coincidental link you're making, you do realise that we were talking nuclear interaction and you're now talking chemical linkage?


What I learned in basic chemistry is when hydrogen and oxygen are combined both become water. Two-thirds of our physical bodies are made up of water ( hydrogen and oxygen), the rest is made up of calcium, phosphorus, carbon, magnesium, potassium, sodium, etc. These elements were radioactive before they finally fused together to form something ( genes ) which I think is the blue print of how a cell when formed turns out to be. It is similar to how you assemble a car.

rajakrsna;1387551 wrote: What I learned in basic chemistry is when hydrogen and oxygen are combined both become water.
That's not a nuclear process. The hydrogen and the oxygen are still in the water unchanged. Just put a battery across a bowl of water and the hydrogen and oxygen bubble straight out again. The nuclear fusion you're talking about is a different way of combining which isn't reversible.

spot;1387561 wrote: That's not a nuclear process. The hydrogen and the oxygen are still in the water unchanged. Just put a battery across a bowl of water and the hydrogen and oxygen bubble straight out again. The nuclear fusion you're talking about is a different way of combining which isn't reversible.


Ok! Now let`s drink water. The water goes to the stomach down to the small intestines. It is here where the water is absorbed by the lining epithelium of the organ This lining are cells which allows water to go through where it finds its way into the blood circulation. The water circulated in the blood passes through by diffusion into each cell in the body. When water enters the cell what does it do with the water? It`s in the mitocondria ( powerhouse ) of the cell water is split into hydrogen & oxygen. The energy released from the separation maybe utilized by the cell for its replication.

Alpha Radiation

--------------

Alpha Rad equals Radha- the internal potency of Krishna. She manifests when the egg & sperm unites to form an embryo ( fertilization ). The embryo duplicates, triplicates, until she becomes a fetus then a baby. She`s delivered from the womb into this world as a human being. The baby form of course has genitalia ( female or male ). The baby as she grows is not yet conscious if she`s male or female. The alpha rad cant tell if she`s male or female because she`s not conscious of whether her genitalia is simply male or female. Only when she`s conscious she will know. By asking her parents & why her father`s genitalia is different from hers. & why her mother`s genitalia is the same as hers. At puberty she will learn to distinguish if her body is male or female when her breast swells. & why her childhood playmate did not. She does not know that`s its hormonal in nature. Until she gets horny. Or until her playmate gets horny, too.

In short, all human beings are by nature an alpha rad ( internal potency of God ). We assume being a girl or boy by this attachment ( penile ). Some abhor this attachment because they think they are girls. Some detest why they don`t have this attachment. The latter think they are boys.