DUTCH EU VOTE - raises 'profound questions' about EU direction - UK
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:15 pm
AFX News Limited
DUTCH EU VOTE - 'No' raises 'profound questions' about EU direction - UK UPDATE
06.01.2005, 06:24 PM
(updating with further comment)
LONDON (AFX) - British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the Dutch rejection of the European Union constitution raises 'profound questions' about the future direction of Europe.
Straw, whose government assumes the rotating European Union presidency next month, said he will make a statement in parliament on Monday 'on the implications of the French and Dutch referendums.'
Three days after the French rejected the constitution, voters in the Netherlands overwhelmingly rejected the document which is aimed at streamlining decision-making in the 25-nation bloc, partial results showed.
'The people of the Netherlands have now added their voice to that of the people of France in voting no to the EU Constitutional Treaty,' Straw said.
'This reinforces what I said on Sunday night, that we must all respect the results of the referendums, and we do,' the foreign secretary said.
'The prime minister and I have long made clear that the Constitutional Treaty is a good deal for Britain and for the EU. But the verdict of these referendums now raises profound questions for all of us about the future direction of Europe.
'In an era of globalization, when nations need to find new ways to work together to tackle new problems, Europe needs to be capable of giving citizens the prosperity, security, and social justice they require in ways which fit the modern world.
'And these issues will be the subject of reflection and debate up to and beyond the meeting of all European leaders at the European Council on June 16/17,' he said.
In the wake of the French rejection of the EU charter, British newspapers cited senior government sources as saying that Britain will rule out a referendum of its own if the Dutch also vote 'no,' as expected.
Prime Minister Tony Blair and his ministers have been at pains to keep open the possibility of a British referendum, which had been expected for the first half of next year.
DUTCH EU VOTE - 'No' raises 'profound questions' about EU direction - UK UPDATE
06.01.2005, 06:24 PM
(updating with further comment)
LONDON (AFX) - British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the Dutch rejection of the European Union constitution raises 'profound questions' about the future direction of Europe.
Straw, whose government assumes the rotating European Union presidency next month, said he will make a statement in parliament on Monday 'on the implications of the French and Dutch referendums.'
Three days after the French rejected the constitution, voters in the Netherlands overwhelmingly rejected the document which is aimed at streamlining decision-making in the 25-nation bloc, partial results showed.
'The people of the Netherlands have now added their voice to that of the people of France in voting no to the EU Constitutional Treaty,' Straw said.
'This reinforces what I said on Sunday night, that we must all respect the results of the referendums, and we do,' the foreign secretary said.
'The prime minister and I have long made clear that the Constitutional Treaty is a good deal for Britain and for the EU. But the verdict of these referendums now raises profound questions for all of us about the future direction of Europe.
'In an era of globalization, when nations need to find new ways to work together to tackle new problems, Europe needs to be capable of giving citizens the prosperity, security, and social justice they require in ways which fit the modern world.
'And these issues will be the subject of reflection and debate up to and beyond the meeting of all European leaders at the European Council on June 16/17,' he said.
In the wake of the French rejection of the EU charter, British newspapers cited senior government sources as saying that Britain will rule out a referendum of its own if the Dutch also vote 'no,' as expected.
Prime Minister Tony Blair and his ministers have been at pains to keep open the possibility of a British referendum, which had been expected for the first half of next year.