ForumGarden

Romney announces he will not run for president in 2016 | Fox News

Another bush?

Walker from Wisconsin?

Christie?

Who is the dark horse that is going to come forward and wow us?

None of them, they're all republicans

Depends on where the Koch money goes.

i forgot about marco

Marco Rubio sharpens his potential 2016 pitch - CBS News

There is always Ted Cruz

YZGI;1473272 wrote: Depends on where the Koch money goes.
OMG I just googled him and the wife literally looks like she is from the stepford wives movie... yikes

flopstock;1473279 wrote: OMG I just googled him and the wife literally looks like she is from the stepford wives movie... yikes


They are intending to invest almost $900 million into the 2016 campaign. Almost twice what Romney's budget was. They are from the city I have my shop in (Wichita). And they are republicans.

Koch Brothers' network will drop almost $1 billion on 2016 election - CBS News

YZGI;1473281 wrote: They are intending to invest almost $900 million into the 2016 campaign. Almost twice what Romney's budget was. They are from the city I have my shop in (Wichita). And they are republicans.

Koch Brothers' network will drop almost $1 billion on 2016 election - CBS News


So what is the skinny on them? Do they do good works or just power hungry? Where did they make their money?

flopstock;1473283 wrote: So what is the skinny on them? Do they do good works or just power hungry? Where did they make their money?


They are mainly in natural gas and oil. They do some good here but it seems like it's more for show than truly caring. Its about 60-40 on the love hate, 60 being for (very conservative Catholic area).

Does John Sidney McCain III still own a hat he can throw into this ring we're discussing? He has the virtue of likeability.

flopstock;1473266 wrote: Another bush?


Anyone related to that ignorant gonad [1] who presided over 9/11 would be a distinctly awful idea. Don't start rumors.

Were the choice entirely down to me I'd pick the most recent Republican Vice-President.





[1]: I'm attempting to translate the entirely English "pillock" here for an International audience. There may be better alternatives.

Hillary Clinton

Does that WOW any one ?

No, she hasn't announced yet - will she?

Probably.

Patsy

spot;1473290 wrote: Does John Sidney McCain III still own a hat he can throw into this ring we're discussing? He has the virtue of likeability.





Anyone related to that ignorant gonad [1] who presided over 9/11 would be a distinctly awful idea. Don't start rumors.

Were the choice entirely down to me I'd pick the most recent Republican Vice-President.





[1]: I'm attempting to translate the entirely English "pillock" here for an International audience. There may be better alternatives.


Um, that would be Dick Cheney.

YZGI;1473294 wrote: Um, that would be Dick Cheney.


That's the chap, yes. No potential Republican contender knows more about making a White House Administration work then he does. Used to be CEO of a firm called Halliburton. He is, I imagine, wealthy enough to run out of his own pocket.

I'm disappointed that Romney is leaving. I was hoping to have a nice full clown car for the primaries. I guess Rick Perry will have to run, to fill in the comedy gap left by Rmoney.

I will miss Romney trying to act convincingly when he tries to play the role of a down home average 'murican.

spot;1473295 wrote: That's the chap, yes. No potential Republican contender knows more about making a White House Administration work then he does. Used to be CEO of a firm called Halliburton. He is, I imagine, wealthy enough to run out of his own pocket.


I've heard him referred to as Darth Vader

YZGI;1473297 wrote: I've heard him referred to as Darth Vader


Good lord no. Darth Vader has a fully working Death Star with which he destroys entire planets in less than a day. Mr Cheney is far less ambitious and besides, there's no point turning to the Dark Side if you're inadequately trained in the Force to start with. In technical terms, Mr Cheney lacks sufficient midi-chlorians. Amoral war criminal with fraudulent tendencies, yes. Sith warrior, not a hope.

Cheney for 2016.

Though Mitt would not be my first choice



He is preferable to anyone the the Demos present. With that said just as glad he ain't running.

Ahso!;1473268 wrote: None of them, they're all republicans


My sentiments exactly.

AnneBoleyn;1473319 wrote: My sentiments exactly.


Party line vote.

No though required. Good thinking.

tude dog;1473322 wrote: Party line vote.

No though required. Good thinking.


It takes no amount of thinking not to vote Republican, true. I would never, because even if I happened to "like" a Republican, they always vote, lately, as a conservative block. There are Republicans, some, that I can tolerate. About always voting Democrat? I'd like to be able to vote for an independent such as Bernie Sanders, but VT. isn't my state. He aligns himself with the Democrats, true, but he is a Socialist, AND SO AM I. I make no apologies to you for that. That's who & what I am. I don't expect to change, but hey, you never know. I bet it will be a cold day in hell before you switch your party line and vote for a Democrat. Have you, in recent memory, done that? Have you ever done that?

AnneBoleyn;1473323 wrote: It takes no amount of thinking not to vote Republican, true. I would never, because even if I happened to "like" a Republican, they always vote, lately, as a conservative block. There are Republicans, some, that I can tolerate. About always voting Democrat? I'd like to be able to vote for an independent such as Bernie Sanders, but VT. isn't my state. He aligns himself with the Democrats, true, but he is a Socialist, AND SO AM I. I make no apologies to you for that. That's who & what I am. I don't expect to change, but hey, you never know. I bet it will be a cold day in hell before you switch your party line and vote for a Democrat. Have you, in recent memory, done that? Have you ever done that?


I don't vote party line.

tude dog;1473330 wrote: I don't vote party line.I think the question was whether you'd ever voted for a Democrat. I can remember when the Democrats ruled the South, back before LBJ upset the Southern race applecart, for example. Party core values change, sometimes abruptly. I have, in England, over my lifetime, voted Conservative, Labour and Liberal at different elections. I manage that by thinking before exercising my franchise.

I do plenty of thinking. I think the Republicans suck. Period. I usually can tell one by the expression on their faces, that's how different from me they are. They are generally tight-assed & hateful, sarcastic & mean-spirited. Not that your average Democrat is a better human, but they are more diverse.

spot;1473331 wrote: I think the question was whether you'd ever voted for a Democrat.


I just said I don't vote partry lines.

tude dog;1473335 wrote: I just said I don't vote partry lines.


And indeed I heard you say just that. The question is still valid, though. Have you ever voted for a candidate who, coincidentally to your voting for him as a candidate, was standing as a Democrat candidate. By all means say "no" if you haven't, it's just that if you, personally, ignore party lines and vote for the individual every time then it would a an odd answer.

As much as I'm ashamed of some of the votes I cast, here they are in presidential races since 1980: *I was a Born Again Christian only to later learn just how racist they (and I) were. The only votes on the following list I'm comfortable with is Gore, and the two Green Party candidates.

Reagan*

Reagan*

Bush*

Clinton

Perot

Gore

Green Party

Obama

Jill Stein

The most recent Republican I voted for locally was a couple of years ago; Tom Shaller for township supervisor.

ETA: Also, there's nothing wrong with party line voting for the purpose of coat-tailing.

Ahso: "The most recent Republican I voted for locally was a couple of years ago; Tom Shaller for township supervisor."

Yes, there may be (though not in Brooklyn NY) some local races where the Republican candidate might be the superior one, but in that case I would abstain from voting.

I'm a die hard anti-Republican. I couldn't force myself to vote that way, my Grandma would come back from the dead & beat me.

I would hopefully have a third party candidate I liked, & vote for that person even if he/she had no chance. The two-party system is very confining.

And indeed I heard you say just that. The question is still valid, though. Have you ever voted for a candidate who, coincidentally to your voting for him as a candidate, was standing as a Democrat candidate. By all means say "no" if you haven't, it's just that if you, personally, ignore party lines and vote for the individual every time then it would a an odd answer.


It was a her.

tude dog;1473372 wrote: It was a her.


So, it was a one time deal?