tude dog wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:43 am
Here is one example of the clusterf@ck.
Well done, I've seen lots about "12 and over" and "secondary school". What I haven't seen anything abut is a single instance of mandatory masking of primary children in an American public school. Teachers and staff, yes. Secondary pupils, yes. Just no children.
Can you see an example we could discuss that covers an 8 year old?
tude dog wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:43 am
Here is one example of the clusterf@ck.
Well done, I've seen lots about "12 and over" and "secondary school". What I haven't seen anything about is a single instance of mandatory masking of primary children in an American public school. Teachers and staff, yes. Secondary pupils, yes. Just no children.
Can you see an example we could discuss that covers an 8 year old? Or, to repeat the exact words of my question, "Let's say, for the sake of argument, any child under 8, since "child" isn't a word which brings teenagers to mind and your vile cartoon has a three year old in it".
I'd so much prefer a quote in text rather than a filthy youtube clip I have to work out how to play and then sit through and end up with no actual text to quote and query with. I'm sick of videos as answers, they take a lifetime to play and I never know which bits are relevant. TEXT IS GOOD.
tude dog wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:43 am
Here is one example of the clusterf@ck.
Well done, I've seen lots about "12 and over" and "secondary school". What I haven't seen anything about is a single instance of mandatory masking of primary children in an American public school. Teachers and staff, yes. Secondary pupils, yes. Just no children.
Can you see an example we could discuss that covers an 8 year old? Or, to repeat the exact words of my question, "Let's say, for the sake of argument, any child under 8, since "child" isn't a word which brings teenagers to mind and your vile cartoon has a three year old in it".
I'd so much prefer a quote in text rather than a filthy youtube clip I have to work out how to play and then sit through and end up with no actual text to quote and query with. I'm sick of videos as answers, they take a lifetime to play and I never know which bits are relevant. TEXT IS GOOD.
tude dog wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:43 am
Here is one example of the clusterf@ck.
Well done, I've seen lots about "12 and over" and "secondary school". What I haven't seen anything about is a single instance of mandatory masking of primary children in an American public school. Teachers and staff, yes. Secondary pupils, yes. Just no children.
Can you see an example we could discuss that covers an 8 year old? Or, to repeat the exact words of my question, "Let's say, for the sake of argument, any child under 8, since "child" isn't a word which brings teenagers to mind and your vile cartoon has a three year old in it".
I'd so much prefer a quote in text rather than a filthy youtube clip I have to work out how to play and then sit through and end up with no actual text to quote and query with. I'm sick of videos as answers, they take a lifetime to play and I never know which bits are relevant. TEXT IS GOOD.
Forget about it. Never know what tomorrow will bring.
Even After Cutting in Line for Vaccines, Teachers won't Return to Work | Opinion
What fun. I now know the opinion of Jason Rantz, Host, the Jason Rantz Show. The Newsweek website even labels the page "Opinion".
I piss on the face of your Jason Rantz, Host, the Jason Rantz Show. He has an opinion which is designed to intimidate and polarize. What he isn't is news or information. He is as unwelcome in this discussion as syphilis would be at a mixed-sex undergraduate party.
What fun. I now know the opinion of Jason Rantz, Host, the Jason Rantz Show. The Newsweek website even labels the page "Opinion".
I piss on the face of your Jason Rantz, Host, the Jason Rantz Show. He has an opinion which is designed to intimidate and polarize. What he isn't is news or information. He is as unwelcome in this discussion as syphilis would be at a mixed-sex undergraduate party.
I give you a text and you focus on a name, Jason Rantz?
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:13 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:15 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 12:07 pm
by spot
tude dog wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:09 am
I give you a text and you focus on a name, Jason Rantz?
You gave me an opinion piece - not a news article, an OPINION piece - by some ignorant shock-jock whose armpits I would refuse to shine my shoes with. His name is Immaterial. Jason Immaterial.
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 1:34 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:51 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:54 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:00 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:03 am
by tude dog
<blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="DERAbwt"><a href=" post on imgur.com</a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:05 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:21 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:23 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:14 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:16 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:48 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 12:41 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:26 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:29 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:07 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:08 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:09 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 10:14 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 10:15 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:17 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:19 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:30 am
by spot
That last one is interesting. Can you find a single real photo of a helicopter sat on the roof of the US embassy in Kabul? I've not seen one yet.
Or is the cartoon yet another propaganda lie?
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:42 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 11:07 am
by spot
Typical response, then.
I've no idea how you think these cartoons are informing anyone's assessment.
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 11:40 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 11:42 am
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 11:47 am
by spot
Just for the record, with all these Saigon comparisons cropping up in these amateur cartoons: the US has not won a single major military conflict since that against Japan 76 years ago, despite having chosen to engage in more than any other country. Saigon is merely the tip of the iceberg.
By contrast, ignoring Suez, the only major military conflicts Britain has lost have been those where we partnered America.
To be honest, I don't think the Pentagon staff have ever been up to the job.
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:15 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:47 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:49 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:06 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:25 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:04 pm
by tude dog
Re: Political Cartoons
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:13 pm
by spot
Peace with dishonor is undoubtedly true, but was it not preceded by war with dishonor? I'm not sure you can emphasize the one while ignoring the other.