Peter Mandelson attacked with green custard by protester

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:10 pm

Clodhopper;1154677 wrote: ...and worth it just for Prescott's punch. A moment I shall always treasure.

Yes, Pressers right hook was a joy to behold but he gave me the best moment of mirth i have had in a long time. In one fell swop, Presser out classed the right hook when he flicked the V's at the SNP's

http://www.thewave.co.uk/article.php?article=3933

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl I'll try to find the vid.

Post by **spot** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:49 pm

oscar;1153842 wrote: It was designed to bring maximum insult to the menopausal ugly Tory Tossing rancid old trogg :wah:Your attempt is toothless if it's simply obviously untrue. Leila Dean is, sadly for your purposes, the protest movement's 2009 Babelicious.

The picture is less than seven days old. I rest my case.

Attached files

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:13 pm

spot;1154725 wrote: You're attempt is toothless if it's simply obviously untrue. Leila Dean is, sadly for your purposes, the protest movement's 2009 Babelicious.

The picture is less than seven days old. I rest my case. Spot...... coming from a man who wrote a thread entitled 'Local Blue-rinse Battle-Axe makes world news'. your judgement is in question. Now you have seen how exceptionally young and gorgeous i am to the male eye, you know your judgement is impaired. I have not entirely forgiven you for labelling me with that title and i shall reek my revenge on you at the next FG meet :sneaky::wah:

If you think that old trogg is, what was it 'Barbelicious. then i can only assume that you have not located your specs since the last FG meet. The nearest that rancid hag comes to 'Barbelicious' is in the sense that she soes indeed resemble a hog on a spit over a barbeque. :p

Post by **spot** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:17 pm

I'd snog her any evening.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:44 pm

spot;1154760 wrote: I'd snog her any evening. The mere suggestion of you in a 'snog' with any form of of life induces me to quote gmc...' Boak over my keyboard'. You are now responsible for keeping me awake tonight with that revolting concept and have put me off my jammy dodgers.

I will organise a search for your specs as you have obviousley taken leave of your senses without them. Either that or you are desperate in available life-form to snog. May i suggest that you snog the first rear end of a bus passing your Bristol home as this not only looks more pleasing but will probably have fresher breath.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:45 pm

spot;1154725 wrote: You're attempt is toothless if it's simply obviously untrue. Leila Dean is, sadly for your purposes, the protest movement's 2009 Babelicious.

The picture is less than seven days old. I rest my case.

Besides which, this is a Tory for god's sake man.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:32 am

posted by oscar

'Local Blue-rinse Battle-Axe makes world news'. :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

posted by clodhopper

I think, on balance, I'm in favour of pelting our politicians with noxious but harmless substances from time to time. Good safety valve, and an acceptable modern alternative the the C17/18 mob brawls that occurred. Makes it easier for women to participate fully in the British democratic process, too.

It's been a few years since we have had a good riot on our streets. We have a very long tradition of rioting and protesting about our politicians. maybe we need to bring back some good old british traditions and start trying to lynch the bastards.

It's funny the double standards. leila dean gets damned as a thug as to other protesters against heathrow or anything that might affect ordinary people.

Yet hunt supporters that break in to parliament get prime time TV interviews so they can expound on their right to protest, have riots where 60 policemen end up hospitalised and the police promise to punish any policeman that might have been tempted to overreact when someone throws a stone at them.

Parliament hunt protest hurt 60 policemen - Telegraph

Mandy is a crook and a liar using his position to help make his cronies even more wealthy. He does it quite blatantly without a hint he might understand what is wrong with his actions. Everybody knows it and yet he gets away with it. He's one of the reasons new labour are going to lose the next election and so many long time supporters are leaving the labour party sick at heart. There's not even a strong enough character in government you can really hate (unlike thatcher) It's like looking at a plate of cockroaches wondering what is the point of keeping them around.

Post by **spot** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:38 am

gmc;1155011 wrote: Mandy is a crook and a liar using his position to help make his cronies even more wealthy. He does it quite blatantly without a hint he might understand what is wrong with his actions. Everybody knows it and yet he gets away with it.I've seen it claimed. I don't think it's true. I think if someone as well-meaning as him can get squeezed out of politics by the media then the media should be mended. He was brought up on the notion of public service, he's got up a lot of noses, other politicians to their shame have worked with the media to destroy him. It suggests to me that the system is broken if they eventually succeed.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:36 am

gmc;1155011 wrote: posted by oscar

':yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

posted by clodhopper

It's been a few years since we have had a good riot on our streets. We have a very long tradition of rioting and protesting about our politicians. maybe we need to bring back some good old british traditions and start trying to lynch the bastards.

It's funny the double standards. leila dean gets damned as a thug as to other protesters against heathrow or anything that might affect ordinary people.

Yet hunt supporters that break in to parliament get prime time TV interviews so they can expound on their right to protest, have riots where 60 policemen end up hospitalised and the police promise to punish any policeman that might have been tempted to overreact when someone throws a stone at them.

Parliament hunt protest hurt 60 policemen - Telegraph

Mandy is a crook and a liar using his position to help make his cronies even more wealthy. He does it quite blatantly without a hint he might understand what is wrong with his actions. Everybody knows it and yet he gets away with it. He's one of the reasons new labour are going to lose the next election and so many long time supporters are leaving the labour party sick at heart. There's not even a strong enough character in government you can really hate (unlike thatcher) It's like looking at a plate of cockroaches wondering what is the point of keeping them around.

Don't even think of going there sporren features

Your article is 5 years out of date however, yes, it was a bloody disgrace. As an anti-fox protester, this got right up my chuff at the time i recall. I have to be honest, I came very close to smacking a toffy nosed Tory Tosser many a time over fox hunting. If we could protest in a manner where no-body got hurt, I was out-raged when this happened as is it not supposed to be 'The Gentry' who is pro fox hunting to 'keep the numbers down'? Just goes to show that Tory Tossers are no differebt to the yobs that roam our streets.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:41 am

spot;1155013 wrote: I've seen it claimed. I don't think it's true. I think if someone as well-meaning as him can get squeezed out of politics by the media then the media should be mended. He was brought up on the notion of public service, he's got up a lot of noses, other politicians to their shame have worked with the media to destroy him. It suggests to me that the system is broken if they eventually succeed.

Mandy has never been in my top 10 and i wouldn't snog him like i would Gordon but i was horrified at his return to the Cabinet.

The festering Tory, piece of lime-scale should be strung up for assaulting him all the same. I admire Mandy's dignity in this however, and not giving this moronic, brain dead, Tory Tossing, group of sour old spinsters their day in court. :p

Post by **spot** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:43 am

oscar;1155046 wrote: Your article is 5 years out of date however, yes, it was a bloody disgrace. As an anti-fox protester, this got right up my chuff at the time i recall. I have to be honest, I came very close to smacking a toffy nosed Tory Tosser many a time over fox hunting. If we could protest in a manner where no-body got hurt, I was out-raged when this happened as is it not supposed to be 'The Gentry' who is pro fox hunting to 'keep the numbers down'? Just goes to show that Tory Tossers are no differebt to the yobs that roam our streets.

Oscar, you seem to be attempting to import US-style blackguarding into English politics and it isn't desirable. Sometimes there's a Labour administration, sometimes there's a Tory administration. What matters is that neither implements policies at the outer edge of their ideology, what each party brings in has to be something the other party can live with and adapt rather than throw out. Politics in England is incrementally progressive, not revolutionary. The Second House, to a large extent, is responsible for that crafted compromise. The exception was, of course, that fanatical demented cow in the 80s may she rot. Her most unforgivable crime was ignoring the need for consent. You're taking the same road.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:47 am

spot;1155050 wrote: Oscar, you seem to be attempting to import US-style blackguarding into English politics and it isn't desirable. Sometimes there's a Labour administration, sometimes there's a Tory administration. What matters is that neither implements policies at the outer edge of their ideology, what each party brings in has to be something the other party can live with and adapt rather than throw out. Politics in England is incrementally progressive, not revolutionary. The Second House, to a large extent, is responsible for that crafted compromise. The exception was, of course, that fanatical demented cow in the 80s may she rot. Her most unforgivable crime was ignoring the need for consent. You're taking the same road. 'Ignoring the need for consent'? hmmm. I recall a government ignoring the need for consent over two issue's off the top of my head in far more recent times than Thatcher.

Post by **spot** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:08 am

oscar;1155053 wrote: 'Ignoring the need for consent'? hmmm. I recall a government ignoring the need for consent over two issue's off the top of my head in far more recent times than Thatcher.

Then they erred. The principle is commonplace in Britiah politics though. Obviously one can argue a given instance is an exception. The contrast I'm trying to draw is with the US where sticking to the commonly acceptable is rare.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:59 am

oscar;1155046 wrote: Don't even think of going there sporren features

Your article is 5 years out of date however, yes, it was a bloody disgrace. As an anti-fox protester, this got right up my chuff at the time i recall. I have to be honest, I came very close to smacking a toffy nosed Tory Tosser many a time over fox hunting. If we could protest in a manner where no-body got hurt, I was out-raged when this happened as is it not supposed to be 'The Gentry' who is pro fox hunting to 'keep the numbers down'? Just goes to show that Tory Tossers are no differebt to the yobs that roam our streets.

I was drawing using the article to draw an analogy, that the date is five years ago is a spurious point to make. It's the double standard I was on about. If 60 policemen had been injured at say a protest against the Heathrow expansion there would have been universal outrage. Her protest is quite innocuous in comparison.

What does her being a tory have to do with anything? If she was one of those being chucked out her house to make way for heathrow this would that be more acceptable to you? people have every right to be angry over this and labour are doing their best to quietly get it through hoping no ione will protest and everyone willl just roll over.

posted by oscar

Ignoring the need for consent'? hmmm. I recall a government ignoring the need for consent over two issue's off the top of my head in far more recent times than Thatcher.

That's why we need proportional representation. it would stop the farcical situation where two thirds of the voters are effectively disenfranchised. We also need to get away from this prime ministerial system we seem to have adopted. It is unbritish and undemocratic

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:21 am

gmc;1155203 wrote: I was drawing using the article to draw an analogy, that the date is five years ago is a spurious point to make. It's the double standard I was on about. If 60 policemen had been injured at say a protest against the Heathrow expansion there would have been universal outrage. Her protest is quite innocuous in comparison.

What does her being a tory have to do with anything? If she was one of those being chucked out her house to make way for heathrow this would that be more acceptable to you? people have every right to be angry over this and labour are doing their best to quietly get it through hoping no ione will protest and everyone willl just roll over.

posted by oscar

That's why we need proportional representation. it would stop the farcical situation where two thirds of the voters are effectively disenfranchised. We also need to get away from this prime ministerial system we seem to have adopted. It is unbritish and undemocratic

Yes I got the analogy and it was a good one.

I don't see a double standard. The pro-hunters should have been arrested for assault and this old bint should have been arrested for assault.

It is the moronic acts of this bints group 'Plane stupid' that i also object to. A protest that hinders an air ambulance carrying a sick baby is not a protest. It is stupidity at it's highest level.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:58 am

spot;1155013 wrote: I've seen it claimed. I don't think it's true. I think if someone as well-meaning as him can get squeezed out of politics by the media then the media should be mended. He was brought up on the notion of public service, he's got up a lot of noses, other politicians to their shame have worked with the media to destroy him. It suggests to me that the system is broken if they eventually succeed.

I don't think we're using the same dictionary here - well meaning doesn't generally translate to self serving or backstabbing where I come from.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:45 pm

oscar;1155221 wrote: Yes I got the analogy and it was a good one.

I don't see a double standard. The pro-hunters should have been arrested for assault and this old bint should have been arrested for assault.

It is the moronic acts of this bints group 'Plane stupid' that i also object to. A protest that hinders an air ambulance carrying a sick baby is not a protest. It is stupidity at it's highest level.

She has been arrested.

Activist arrested for throwing green custard over Peter Mandelson | Politics | guardian.co.uk

None of the pro-hunt protesters were.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:18 pm

gmc;1155379 wrote: She has been arrested.

Activist arrested for throwing green custard over Peter Mandelson | Politics | guardian.co.uk

None of the pro-hunt protesters were. :yh_dance:yh_dance:yh_party:yh_party

The difference with the fox hunters is that they boo hoo'd police brutality :-1 and got away with it.

Mandy has had a slight irritation to his face since. So have I ever since i've had to look at the obnoxious, gloating ugly old bint.

Lives in Brighton does she..... that's interesting

Chookie · Post by **Chookie** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:30 pm

oscar;1155428 wrote: Lives in Brighton does she..... that's interesting

Well, somebody has to............

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:51 pm

Chookie;1155434 wrote: Well, somebody has to............ :yh_rotfl Good One. Why do you think I live in Bristol?

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:41 am

spot;1155013 wrote: I've seen it claimed. I don't think it's true. I think if someone as well-meaning as him can get squeezed out of politics by the media then the media should be mended. He was brought up on the notion of public service, he's got up a lot of noses, other politicians to their shame have worked with the media to destroy him. It suggests to me that the system is broken if they eventually succeed.

I assumed you were being facetious with this one. Otherwise we will next see you suggesting that Tony Blair is a well meaning individual brought up on the notion of public service who was badly misled by the intelligence services when it came to the invasion of iraq.

Post by **spot** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:55 am

gmc;1155624 wrote: I assumed you were being facetious with this one. Otherwise we will next see you suggesting that Tony Blair is a well meaning individual brought up on the notion of public service who was badly misled by the intelligence services when it came to the invasion of iraq.

I had no problem with Saddam Hussein either, if you remember. And no, Tony Blair wasn't misled in the least, he lied over the intelligence but that doesn't mean I disapproved of his time in office.

The pig at the party is George Bush. He presided over an Administration which stood down the US homeland air defence on 9/11 in order to go to war.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:09 am

gmc;1155624 wrote: I assumed you were being facetious with this one. Otherwise we will next see you suggesting that Tony Blair is a well meaning individual brought up on the notion of public service who was badly misled by the intelligence services when it came to the invasion of iraq. Mandy is a lying, cheating, back stabbing bastard who dissed my main man.

Post by **spot** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:52 am

oscar;1155750 wrote: Mandy is a lying, cheating, back stabbing bastard who dissed my main man.

He's your main man's best hope of another term, stop wrecking your chances.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:03 pm

spot;1155829 wrote: He's your main man's best hope of another term, stop wrecking your chances. So you think the continuation of Mandy in the Cabinet will help a second term?

Post by **spot** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:21 pm

oscar;1155836 wrote: So you think the continuation of Mandy in the Cabinet will help a second term?

second??

This administration's been in continuous government since 1997, that's 12 years in office, it'll be 13 if he doesn't seek a mandate this May or October. They're on thin ice.

Once we reach a point where no member of any Thatcher government still sits on the shadow front bench and stands no way of getting there, all bets are off as to who might win. And, thug though he is, I don't even mind Ken Clarke that much, he has his civilized aspects. Theresa May and Ann Winterton are the people keeping them out of power at the moment.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:53 pm

spot;1155849 wrote: second??

This administration's been in continuous government since 1997, that's 12 years in office, it'll be 13 if he doesn't seek a mandate this May or October. They're on thin ice.

Once we reach a point where no member of any Thatcher government still sits on the shadow front bench and stands no way of getting there, all bets are off as to who might win. And, thug though he is, I don't even mind Ken Clarke that much, he has his civilized aspects. Theresa May and Ann Winterton are the people keeping them out of power at the moment.

Ah happy days

YouTube - 1993 Labour Party Broadcast with Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie

What a complete bunch of arseholes labour turned out to be

posted by iscar

Mandy is a lying, cheating, back stabbing bastard who dissed my main man.

Who was the moron who let him back in to government? Answers please on a postcard to

I am a daily mail reader

10 Numpty street

Cloud cuckoo street

Gordon is a moron land

England

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:57 pm

gmc;1155938 wrote: Ah happy days

YouTube - 1993 Labour Party Broadcast with Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie

What a complete bunch of arseholes labour turned out to be

posted by iscar

Who was the moron who let him back in to government? Answers please on a postcard to

I am a daily mail reader

10 Numpty street

Cloud cuckoo street

Gordon is a moron land

England

YouTube - Spitting Image - 80s House Price Slump :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Spot, I meant second term as in second term for the main man not the government.

Good evening Scotland. Your grumpy, is your jock strap pinching your balls again?

If his Lushiouness did let him in again and that pisses you off, in hindsight, it was a wise decision.

I will send my reply to:

I am a sad dis-allusione Party of one,

C/O The SNP

Caber Tossing Moron

Salmond is a bald numpty land

Scotworld

Please deliver before 6 pm as Scotworld closes for the night.

Chookie · Post by **Chookie** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:02 pm

oscar;1155981 wrote: Spot, I meant second term as in second term for the main man not the government.

Alas poor Oscar, the moron can't have a second term. The useless bastard was never elected in the first place.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:10 pm

Chookie;1156019 wrote: Alas poor Oscar, the moron can't have a second term. The useless bastard was never elected in the first place. Double alas oh Chookiness. This is the exact point. The Cabinet may have voted his Wonderfullness into No 10 but when the vote goes to the country, you will see a massive landslide victory to his Worthiness.

Akex Who?? :yh_rotfl