Bob Quick.

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:06 pm

It looks as though Mr. Quick has been rather dense.

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:45 pm

You must elaborate for us.

Please.

Attached files

dubs · Post by **dubs** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:21 pm

Twelve Men Arrested As Part Of Counter-Terrorism Operation Across North West Of England | UK News | Sky News

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:37 pm

Thank you, dubs.

"And what exactly are those documents you are carrying? Yeah, the ones with CLASSIFIED stamped in red on the front envelope. Just names and addresses of whom?...........Nobody we would know?........Oh. "

Post by **Peter Lake** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:35 pm

dubs;1171981 wrote: Twelve Men Arrested As Part Of Counter-Terrorism Operation Across North West Of England | UK News | Sky News At least he never left it on the train

princessladedah · Post by **princessladedah** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:30 pm

Hey I need those for my blt:yh_rotfl

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:44 am

along-for-the-ride;1172005 wrote: "And what exactly are those documents you are carrying? Yeah, the ones with CLASSIFIED stamped in red on the front envelope. Just names and addresses of whom?...........Nobody we would know?........Oh. "

I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.

The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.

Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:36 am

Bill Sikes;1172177 wrote: I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.

The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.

Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid? He's quit:

Terror Police Chief Bob Quick Steps Down Over Security Blunder | UK News | Sky News

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:26 pm

Bill Sikes;1172177 wrote: I'm not sure whether you're (?) excusing this man, from the above. Perhaps you'll explain.

The document marked "secret" that he carried, which was photographed, and which photographs were circulated internationally in clear readable form (publication here was subject to a "D-notice", and photographs have not, AFAIK, been circulated in legible format), was an outline briefing on a police counter-terrorism operation, and among other information contained details of the suspects.

Wasn't his action, to say the least, stupid?

No, there are no excuses for him. His action was very unprofessional, and stupid.

I was mocking him.

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:59 pm

Terror raids: nine men released - Telegraph

Lots of unanswered questions, though.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:43 pm

Bill Sikes;1178495 wrote: Terror raids: nine men released - Telegraph

Lots of unanswered questions, though.

Well, it racked up the tension another notch so I guess it succeeded.