Iran illuminati agent Ahmadinejad steals election from Moussavi, as predicted by MM

Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:36 am

Iran "elections" 2009: Moussavi defeats illuminati agent Ahmadinejad, yet Illuminati immediately reacted proving that they are not ready to lose control, by falsifying the results. In other words: despite exit polls of 65% for Moussavi, Ahmadinejad claims victory with 69%... (a)

Reminder - Prophet's words, 5 days ago, 7 June 2009 (1):

IRAN: Today's Rally proves Moussavi will defeat illuminati agent Ahmadinejad

If you are confused by these news, then you are a beast that believes that Ahmadinejad, the key actor besides the anti-pope in the "deny the Holocaust" agenda, is not an illuminati agent (2)

CIA psy-op D. Bunker ("Senior Forum Moderator") replies:

"I do believe the Mullah's are indicating a potentially more amiable administration could replace the current one, but it is the Mullah's that run Iran, not Ahmadinejad."

Prophet replies:

Bunker, Repeating the illuminati's media story is NOT replying to this article.

Poster replies:

Democracy at work.

As long as it's a fair election, with no CIA meddling, or computerized vote fraud foolishness like we have here in Amerika, why would anyone have a problem with Iranians choosing their leaders by way of the ballot box?

Prophet replies:

Correct. The difference to India: google

From "moon" "landing" 1969 to "elections" in world's largest "democracy", India 2009

(a) Added 2 days later, June 14: "corrected" to "only" 63% followed by another End Times Irony: Hillary Clinton becomes the second to echo the Ahmadinedjad Hoax, first exposed by Prophet.

Google "web-of-truth.blogspot"

From CNN to Al-jazeera, from France24 to BBC, hide Moussavi's fate and hundreds of his supporters jailed and murdered, while they try to convince the audience that the protesters are a minority of students. To prove it, they non-stop broadcast "press conferences" by Ahmadinejad and his Goebbels "information" minister, while they non stop use the expression "a sea of people" to describe 50,000 in a rally supporting Ahmadinejad, where a large share was bussed to Tehran.

Poster interpreter replies (see first reply): (3)

"Ahmadinejad is evidently one of the demon possessed leaders of the east who start the Battle of Ar Mageddon.

"You mean Fake Armageddon, in NATO script, with Iran launching a nuclear attack against Israel. For the real Armageddon take the path to the TRUTH:

Google

"Armageddon for dummies" *baisc facts"

Poster broederbond replies (see second reply)

"Any PROOF that Hossein Mossavi, is the 'REAL' Iran election winner ???????????"

Proof is the same as in the US 2004 and 2008 (McCain with 5 million mulitplied by 12) or Stalin's 99.8% of the votes.

THEY (or in the computerized version, their software) do not let anyone else count the votes.

US Attack to Iran for dummies or NATO v Jihad Hoax: Iran: illuminati agent Ahmadinejad forced to steal election from Mousavi Khameneh, as predicted

Difference between McCain and Ahmadinejad: Ahmadinejad does NOT play the loser role, in the two scripts, authored by one and the same.

Difference between Kerry and Moussavi: Moussavi does NOT belong to the same secret society as the actor playing the winner role (Bush 2004 and Ahmadinejad 2009), unlike Kerry, the actor playing the loser role.

Notes

Google title in quotes

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:22 am

You need to get out more mate.

Post by **spot** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:33 am

Perhaps I might offer my congratulations to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his election victory, I'm delighted he can continue to lead Iran's resistance to Western Imperialist aggression in the Middle East. As a reaction to events it was entirely predictable. Stop pushing and Iran might well eventually lose its revolutionary nationalist fervor after a generation or two.

Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:19 am

Hugo Chavez, pathetic victim of the BIG LIE technique, swallows Ahmadinejad hoax till bitter end

Iranian "elections" where as predicted, illuminati were forced to steal election from Mousavi, turning 25% of the votes into 65%. (1)

The pathetic aftermath in the illuminati media, June 15: CNN serves again a 2008 Ahmadinejad "interview" with Larry King as salesman, while in Tehran and other cities millions protest on the streets the rigged elections.

Much more pathetic: Hugo Chavez, a true resister, not able to admit he was fooled

Hugo Chavez is someone who resisted every Illuminati attempt to get him out of the way. In particular the illuminati failed in the attempts using two of the usual techniques: buying resisters, and buying people to overthrow him in an election.

But Hugo Chavez was also someone who from the beginning swallowed the illuminati theater "Ahmadinejad v Bush" aka "Iran in the axis of evil", which he should have understood as early as 2003, as Iran immediately recognized the puppet "government" of Iraq, at the first OPEC conference after the fall of Saddam Hussein, a conference which only Venezuela refused to attend at that time.

Now Chavez is the first to congratulate Ahmadinejad for the "victory", unable to admit that it was a gigantic fraud. In other words: believing the illuminati polls that announced a probable victory of Ahmadinejad, although less than one out of four iraninas was behind the champion of Holocaust denial, in his role in the illuminati "Destruction of Israel" agenda. alias fake Armageddon. (2)

Hugo Chávez is the sad illustration of one of the foundations of the BIG LIE technique (3): the longer someone believes the lie, the harder it will be to admit that he was deceived.

Notes

(1) Differences between Bush, John Kerry and McCain with the Iranian "elections"?

What do Hillary Clinton has to do with echoing what Prophet first exposed, the simple truth about Ahmadinejad being an illuminatia agent?

How does the illuminati media sell Ahmadinejad's "victory" while it censors the fate of arrested and murdered protesters?

(2) Illuminati "Destruction of Israel" agenda. alias fake Armageddon in anti-Bible:

(3) BIG LIE technique

Google title for links

Post by **spot** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:01 am

TruthIsNeverTooHorrible;1203839 wrote: Iranian "elections" where as predicted, illuminati were forced to steal election from Mousavi, turning 25% of the votes into 65%.The world's been here before, watching as foreign subversion bought violence to bear against an elected democratic government of Iran and toppled it in favour of a client puppet regime operating in the interests of the West. What Iran needs most at this point is to uncover and publish proof that Western governments have attempted the same trick again, working through cowardly agencies protected by diplomatic immunity to bring death and destruction to the streets of Tehran in an attempt to overthrow the popular will of the country. The current violence has all the hallmarks of external destabilization fed by an inexhaustible supply of bribe money.

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:09 am

As I see it, the current violence bears all the hallmarks of a population robbed of the change and stability they thought was voted for. Are those hundreds of thousands of protesters all being paid by the CIA ? Or maybe we should give the Iranians a bit more credit

If it proves to be Western agencies attempting to overthrow the government I'll hold my hands up but its not what I seem to be watching on the news.I think those young people are genuinly pissed off at not getting what they voted for

Post by **spot** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:43 pm

Snowfire;1204454 wrote: As I see it, the current violence bears all the hallmarks of a population robbed of the change and stability they thought was voted for. Are those hundreds of thousands of protesters all being paid by the CIA ? Or maybe we should give the Iranians a bit more credit

The last time it happened there the Western subversion didn't need hundreds of thousands of protesters bribed in order to get hundreds of thousands of protesters onto the streets, just their leaders bribing to deploy them. The result was that disgusting criminal Shah chappie lording it over the country for a quarter century of rapine and theft, may he rot.

Abram Is Muslim · Post by **Abram Is Muslim** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:40 pm

I have many Iranian friends Online , by the way the Muslims are 92 Sunni Muslims,and 6% are Shiaa, Iran is One of the Shiaa counteries, she is almost teh only one,anyways , Whats going on Iran......??

The problem in Iran is the involving of the religiouse system in the politics, well the Islamic system aint like that , in the Islamic system, the religousemen are only like consoltant in the Parlamen, where they discuss how much the suggested laws fits the Islamic laws, and so on, thats all,and they supervise what the PM does and the president too, but that aint applaid neither in Iarn nor Saudi Arabia , anyways whats going there.....??

The Iranian says that the CIA's hands appeared in that elections and wanted to do the same as they did in Georgia , and break the goverment of Negad , an help Mossawe, and at the same time , Negad and his team worked against that , and Other candidat, anyways Iran needs to hold on a president to save its community , Negad is strange man, even for me , I oubt his intetations alot, he always say n repeat his threatens to American , Israel, but we all believe its just propegnda,he does his best to have strong political position in the region..............::D::I hate politics .... it sucks really :d

Post by **spot** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:36 am

Scrat;1204970 wrote: Isn't religion very powerful in Saudi politics and other mid east countries? I have gotten the impresssion that they are not just consultants.

He's describing the constitutional arrangement of power in Iran and the extent to which the parties can veto decisions made by each other. Some bodies can advise, others can decide.

Abram Is Muslim · Post by **Abram Is Muslim** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:17 am

spot;1204972 wrote: He's describing the constitutional arrangement of power in Iran and the extent to which the parties can veto decisions made by each other. Some bodies can advise, others can decide.

Thank You Spot , I wanted else,friend, to explain the meaning of an Islamic system, like that one raised in Gaza,

Abram Is Muslim · Post by **Abram Is Muslim** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:20 am

Scrat;1204970 wrote: Isn't religion very powerful in Saudi politics and other mid east countries? I have gotten the impresssion that they are not just consultants.

:D the religion may have a main role in Saudi , but in other counteries in the middle east, NoOoOoo they are completely civilized goverments, but many Islamic group go through the elections , but face arresting by the civilized govermnents supported by US.

Post by **spot** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:10 am

Abram Is Muslim;1204997 wrote:

the religion may have a main role in Saudi , but in other counteries in the middle east, NoOoOoo they are completely civilized goverments, but many Islamic group go through the elections , but face arresting by the civilized govermnents supported by US.

The various national Constitutions give religion a central place in quite a few countries. Here are a few quotes to show what I mean, which I summarise from International Constitutional Law :Iran: Article 1 [Form of Government] The form of government of Iran is that of an Islamic Republic, endorsed by the people of Iran on the basis of their longstanding belief in the sovereignty of truth and Koranic justice

Egypt: Article 2 Islam is the religion of the state and Arabic its official language. Islamic jurisprudence is the principal source of legislation.

Afghanistan: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the state of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is the sacred religion of Islam. Followers of other religions are free to exercise their faith and perform their religious rites within the limits of the provisions of law. Article 3 In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.

Algeria: Article 2 [State Religion] Islam is the religion of the State.

Bahrain: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the State is Islam. The Islamic Shari'a is a principal source for legislation.

Iraq: Article 7 [State Religion, Freedom of Religion, Arab Nation] Islam is the official religion of the State and is to be considered a source of legislation. No law that contradicts the universally agreed tenets of Islam, the principles of democracy, or the rights cited in Chapter Two of this Law may be enacted during the transitional period.

Kuwait: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the State is Islam, and the Islamic Sharia shall be a main source of legislation.

Libya: Article 2 [State Religion, Language] Islam is the religion of the State and Arabic is its official Language. The state protects religious freedom in accordance with established customs.

Oman: Article 2 [Religion] The religion of the State is Islam and the Islamic Shariah is the basis of legislation.

Qatar: Article 1 Qatar is an independent sovereign Arab State. Its religion is Islam and Shari'a law shall be a main source of its legislations.

Saudi Arabia: Article 1 The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a sovereign Arab Islamic state with Islam as its religion

Syria: Article 3 [Islam] (1) The religion of the President of the Republic has to be Islam. (2) Islamic jurisprudence is a main source of legislation.

Tunisia: Article 1 [State] Tunisia is a free State, independent and sovereign; its religion is the Islam, its language is Arabic, and its form is the Republic.

Yemen: Article 2 Islam is the religion of the state and Arabic is its official language.

Morocco: Article 6 [State Religion] Islam is the religion of the State which guarantees to all freedom of worship.It's not just Islamic countries which do this. The UK Constitution provides for Anglicanism to be the State religion, for example.

Aussiepam asked "Are there any modern non-secular islamic countries where people of other faiths are now allowed to live in peace?" and the answer is yes:Turkey: Article 10 Equality before the Law (1) All individuals are equal without any discrimination before the law, irrespective of language, race, colour, sex, political opinion, philosophical belief, religion and sect, or any such considerations.

Abram Is Muslim · Post by **Abram Is Muslim** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:14 am

spot;1205015 wrote: The various national Constitutions give religion a central place in quite a few countries. Here are a few quotes to show what I mean, which I summarise from International Constitutional Law :Iran: Article 1 [Form of Government] The form of government of Iran is that of an Islamic Republic, endorsed by the people of Iran on the basis of their longstanding belief in the sovereignty of truth and Koranic justice

Egypt: Article 2 Islam is the religion of the state and Arabic its official language. Islamic jurisprudence is the principal source of legislation.

Afghanistan: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the state of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is the sacred religion of Islam. Followers of other religions are free to exercise their faith and perform their religious rites within the limits of the provisions of law. Article 3 In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.

Algeria: Article 2 [State Religion] Islam is the religion of the State.

Bahrain: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the State is Islam. The Islamic Shari'a is a principal source for legislation.

Iraq: Article 7 [State Religion, Freedom of Religion, Arab Nation] Islam is the official religion of the State and is to be considered a source of legislation. No law that contradicts the universally agreed tenets of Islam, the principles of democracy, or the rights cited in Chapter Two of this Law may be enacted during the transitional period.

Kuwait: Article 2 [State Religion] The religion of the State is Islam, and the Islamic Sharia shall be a main source of legislation.

Libya: Article 2 [State Religion, Language] Islam is the religion of the State and Arabic is its official Language. The state protects religious freedom in accordance with established customs.

Oman: Article 2 [Religion] The religion of the State is Islam and the Islamic Shariah is the basis of legislation.

Qatar: Article 1 Qatar is an independent sovereign Arab State. Its religion is Islam and Shari'a law shall be a main source of its legislations.

Saudi Arabia: Article 1 The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a sovereign Arab Islamic state with Islam as its religion

Syria: Article 3 [Islam] (1) The religion of the President of the Republic has to be Islam. (2) Islamic jurisprudence is a main source of legislation.

Tunisia: Article 1 [State] Tunisia is a free State, independent and sovereign; its religion is the Islam, its language is Arabic, and its form is the Republic.

Yemen: Article 2 Islam is the religion of the state and Arabic is its official language.

Morocco: Article 6 [State Religion] Islam is the religion of the State which guarantees to all freedom of worship.It's not just Islamic countries which do this. The UK Constitution provides for Anglicanism to be the State religion, for example.

Aussiepam asked "Are there any modern non-secular islamic countries where people of other faiths are now allowed to live in peace?" and the answer is yes:Turkey: Article 10 Equality before the Law (1) All individuals are equal without any discrimination before the law, irrespective of language, race, colour, sex, political opinion, philosophical belief, religion and sect, or any such considerations.

I know friend, but they all have that rule but no one of them apply it, I mean all of them say the Islam is the main source for laws, but 90 % of the laws are not Islamic laws.

Post by **spot** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:02 pm

Abram Is Muslim;1205115 wrote: I know friend, but they all have that rule but no one of them apply it, I mean all of them say the Islam is the main source for laws, but 90 % of the laws are not Islamic laws.

I liked Libya's "The state protects religious freedom in accordance with established customs", it has more of a threat about it than a promise. They're a robust nation, Libya. Very self-reliant. They don't stand for any nonsense internationally.

Abram Is Muslim · Post by **Abram Is Muslim** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:04 pm

spot;1205203 wrote: I liked Libya's "The state protects religious freedom in accordance with established customs", it has more of a threat about it than a promise. They're a robust nation, Libya. Very self-reliant. They don't stand for any nonsense internationally.

but their president is weird

, I like his style

When he travelled to any Country , he doesnt go in palaces, he stay in a Tent

While Libya is a preety country

, but he loves his Tent

Attached files

Post by **spot** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:20 pm

Abram Is Muslim;1205249 wrote: but their president is weird

, I like his style :DI was, and remain, very annoyed about the cowardly way President Reagan assassinated the man's daughter. Some acts are unforgivable.