A typical liberal
A typical liberal
YouTube - Michael Savage - Jo from Florida demonstrates how stupid she is on radio
A typical liberal
Unbelievable!
A typical liberal
If you are going to generalize on a sample size of one, why don't we point to Warren Buffet, or Bill Gates?
A typical liberal
"Michael Savage" is just that a savage idiot.
"How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot
"How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot
A typical liberal
I'm scratching my head, wondering what Mr. Weiner's contribution to society is. He doesn't like welfare recipients apparently, but can't see that he's one too. He's a professional whiner.
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1310525 wrote: "Michael Savage" is just that a savage idiot.
"How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot
If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
"How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot
If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
A typical liberal
hoppy;1310578 wrote: If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
They do have this going for them.
YouTube - Growing Up Black In China
They do have this going for them.
YouTube - Growing Up Black In China
I AM AWESOME MAN
A typical liberal
hoppy;1310578 wrote: If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?
Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1310763 wrote: Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?
Say what?:-3 Is this one of those "how many whiny-a$$ed liberals would it take to change a light bulb" question?
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?
Say what?:-3 Is this one of those "how many whiny-a$$ed liberals would it take to change a light bulb" question?
A typical liberal
hoppy;1310814 wrote:
Say what?:-3 Is this one of those "how many whiny-a$$ed liberals would it take to change a light bulb" question?
No it's a question that demands a notation of formative logic by your part.
I said..."How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot"
and then you exclaimed..."If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl"
followed by my question, that makes complete sense, you're just dodging the question because you know it exposes your hideous premise...
"Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
If you don't mind, "Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
Say what?:-3 Is this one of those "how many whiny-a$$ed liberals would it take to change a light bulb" question?
No it's a question that demands a notation of formative logic by your part.
I said..."How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot"
and then you exclaimed..."If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl"
followed by my question, that makes complete sense, you're just dodging the question because you know it exposes your hideous premise...
"Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
If you don't mind, "Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1310988 wrote: No it's a question that demands a notation of formative logic by your part.
I said..."How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot"
and then you exclaimed..."If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl"
followed by my question, that makes complete sense, you're just dodging the question because you know it exposes your hideous premise...
"Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
If you don't mind, "Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
It's not how many it would take, it's why should we? I live by myself in a two room apartment. So, I should let two or three more people move in just because some idiot liberal says so? Get real. You know you wouldn't open your house to two more families or so. Don't lie and say you would.
I said..."How many people could America support if there were no border?" was his question...
GDP by country (PPP)
1 United States 14,256,275
2 People's Republic of China 8,765,240
America houses roughly 350,000,000 people compared to China's roughly 1,400,000,000 while the U.S.'s GDP is almost double that of China's and this putz has the tone as if America couldn't sustain "600,000,000". What a selfish pig of an idiot"
and then you exclaimed..."If you want to live like most Chinese do, have at it.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl"
followed by my question, that makes complete sense, you're just dodging the question because you know it exposes your hideous premise...
"Right on que...
Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
If you don't mind, "Tell me then, hoppy, how many people do you think it would take for the average US citizen to "live like most Chinese do"?"
It's not how many it would take, it's why should we? I live by myself in a two room apartment. So, I should let two or three more people move in just because some idiot liberal says so? Get real. You know you wouldn't open your house to two more families or so. Don't lie and say you would.
A typical liberal
hoppy;1311012 wrote: It's not how many it would take, it's why should we? I live by myself in a two room apartment. So, I should let two or three more people move in just because some idiot liberal says so? Get real. You know you wouldn't open your house to two more families or so. Don't lie and say you would.
Of course I would
Don't lie an suggest I'm of the position to lead poor lifestyles you're just wishing I'm of the order so your argument will look better.
If you read my post I specifically stated "600,000,000" people. That's far from 1.4 Billion, hoppy
You wish to keep the wealth in the hands of "Americans" simply because of their name which I cannot understand for the better life of me. I simply wish to keep the wealth in the hands of all people which is assuredly possible if it weren't for rich greedy snakes that like to hug the golden pot including quite a significant majority of "Americans" I've personally witnessed. All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
Of course I would
Don't lie an suggest I'm of the position to lead poor lifestyles you're just wishing I'm of the order so your argument will look better.
If you read my post I specifically stated "600,000,000" people. That's far from 1.4 Billion, hoppy
You wish to keep the wealth in the hands of "Americans" simply because of their name which I cannot understand for the better life of me. I simply wish to keep the wealth in the hands of all people which is assuredly possible if it weren't for rich greedy snakes that like to hug the golden pot including quite a significant majority of "Americans" I've personally witnessed. All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1311316 wrote: Of course I would
Don't lie an suggest I'm of the position to lead poor lifestyles you're just wishing I'm of the order so your argument will look better.
If you read my post I specifically stated "600,000,000" people. That's far from 1.4 Billion, hoppy
You wish to keep the wealth in the hands of "Americans" simply because of their name which I cannot understand for the better life of me. I simply wish to keep the wealth in the hands of all people which is assuredly possible if it weren't for rich greedy snakes that like to hug the golden pot including quite a significant majority of "Americans" I've personally witnessed. All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
What a pile of horsecrap.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl So tell me, after you distribute all the wealth and every living soul in the world has their $3.47, what ya gonna do, re-distribute the wealth every few days? Or hours?
Because I'll spend mine on a deck of cards and if I choose my poker partners carefully, I'll be a rich man in awhile.
Don't lie an suggest I'm of the position to lead poor lifestyles you're just wishing I'm of the order so your argument will look better.
If you read my post I specifically stated "600,000,000" people. That's far from 1.4 Billion, hoppy
You wish to keep the wealth in the hands of "Americans" simply because of their name which I cannot understand for the better life of me. I simply wish to keep the wealth in the hands of all people which is assuredly possible if it weren't for rich greedy snakes that like to hug the golden pot including quite a significant majority of "Americans" I've personally witnessed. All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
What a pile of horsecrap.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl So tell me, after you distribute all the wealth and every living soul in the world has their $3.47, what ya gonna do, re-distribute the wealth every few days? Or hours?
Because I'll spend mine on a deck of cards and if I choose my poker partners carefully, I'll be a rich man in awhile.
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1311316 wrote:
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
What does that mean?
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
What does that mean?
A typical liberal
Zapata;1311351 wrote: What does that mean?
It's snyderese for " We liberals are gonna take your gold and give you a liberal **** in the butt".:yh_rotfl
It's snyderese for " We liberals are gonna take your gold and give you a liberal **** in the butt".:yh_rotfl
-
librtyhead
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:32 pm
A typical liberal
Is this another take from the smart people and give to the dumb ones thread? If so I will go put on my Golden diaper and clang my Cowbell! :wah:
Hi!:driving:
Hi!:driving:
A typical liberal
Originally Posted by K.Snyder
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
Zapata;1311351 wrote: What does that mean?
I dont make sense but you never ask me what I mean
Whatever!
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
Zapata;1311351 wrote: What does that mean?
I dont make sense but you never ask me what I mean
Whatever!
I AM AWESOME MAN
A typical liberal
hoppy;1311345 wrote: What a pile of horsecrap.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl So tell me, after you distribute all the wealth and every living soul in the world has their $3.47, what ya gonna do, re-distribute the wealth every few days? Or hours?
Because I'll spend mine on a deck of cards and if I choose my poker partners carefully, I'll be a rich man in awhile.
You're unaware...
1 person can feed Mexico's poor alone...
The youngest son of parents whose families emigrated from Lebanon, Carlos Slim is now the richest man in the world beating-out Microsoft founder Bill Gates for that prestigious top spot. Forbes says there are 1,011 billionaires in the world controlling vast segments of the economy.
The magazine estimates Slim’s fortune to be $53.5 billion, most of which was made with his telecommunications business after Mexico privatized the industry in 1990. Slim is also invested in road building, and energy,
[...]
Many Mexicans complain about his wealth. While most Mexicans earn only $14,500 per year, Slim is a multi-billionaire. They oppose his control of their phone system. Telemex owns 90 percent of all of the landlines and Slim owns about 49.1 percent of the company. They say the company charges one of the highest usage fees in the world.
Economist at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Professor Celso Garrido, says that his monopolies choke-off competition. It is impossible for the little companies to compete resulting in shortages of good jobs leading to emigration to the United States. Forbes Richest Man In World Carlos Slim Fights Off Monopolistic Criticism | Best Syndication I don't know why you're laughing while people are having such a hard time hoppy, you should be ashamed of yourself
Because I'll spend mine on a deck of cards and if I choose my poker partners carefully, I'll be a rich man in awhile.
You're unaware...
1 person can feed Mexico's poor alone...
The youngest son of parents whose families emigrated from Lebanon, Carlos Slim is now the richest man in the world beating-out Microsoft founder Bill Gates for that prestigious top spot. Forbes says there are 1,011 billionaires in the world controlling vast segments of the economy.
The magazine estimates Slim’s fortune to be $53.5 billion, most of which was made with his telecommunications business after Mexico privatized the industry in 1990. Slim is also invested in road building, and energy,
[...]
Many Mexicans complain about his wealth. While most Mexicans earn only $14,500 per year, Slim is a multi-billionaire. They oppose his control of their phone system. Telemex owns 90 percent of all of the landlines and Slim owns about 49.1 percent of the company. They say the company charges one of the highest usage fees in the world.
Economist at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Professor Celso Garrido, says that his monopolies choke-off competition. It is impossible for the little companies to compete resulting in shortages of good jobs leading to emigration to the United States. Forbes Richest Man In World Carlos Slim Fights Off Monopolistic Criticism | Best Syndication I don't know why you're laughing while people are having such a hard time hoppy, you should be ashamed of yourself
A typical liberal
Nomad;1311420 wrote: Originally Posted by K.Snyder
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
I dont make sense but you never ask me what I mean
Whatever!
You don't? :wah: Besides, somebody said we're not allowed to question you.
All "Americans" were born with a golden spoon, hoppy, because they were born in a golden bath.
I dont make sense but you never ask me what I mean
Whatever!
You don't? :wah: Besides, somebody said we're not allowed to question you.
A typical liberal
Zapata;1311351 wrote: What does that mean?
It means, Zapata, that America is a land of far more opportunity than any other. You tell me how anyone in the U.S., that is white, cannot find a damn job? Please
It means, Zapata, that America is a land of far more opportunity than any other. You tell me how anyone in the U.S., that is white, cannot find a damn job? Please
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1311431 wrote: It means, Zapata, that America is a land of far more opportunity than any other. You tell me how anyone in the U.S., that is white, cannot find a damn job? Please
I think that's a true statement. It may not be a job that the person feels is worthy of his talents but it is a job. I'm thinking of 2 examples that I know of personally.
I think that's a true statement. It may not be a job that the person feels is worthy of his talents but it is a job. I'm thinking of 2 examples that I know of personally.
A typical liberal
Zapata;1311433 wrote: I think that's a true statement. It may not be a job that the person feels is worthy of his talents but it is a job. I'm thinking of 2 examples that I know of personally.
Exactly...Working at McDonalds is a bottom tier job here in the States yet in Mexico it's a comfort zone yet everyone, I've known, p***es and moans about jobs paying double that. I don't get it
Exactly...Working at McDonalds is a bottom tier job here in the States yet in Mexico it's a comfort zone yet everyone, I've known, p***es and moans about jobs paying double that. I don't get it
A typical liberal
Zapata;1311425 wrote: You don't? :wah: Besides, somebody said we're not allowed to question you.
They probably meant for your own personal self preservation.
They probably meant for your own personal self preservation.
I AM AWESOME MAN
A typical liberal
K.Snyder;1311423 wrote: You're unaware...
1 person can feed Mexico's poor alone...
I don't know why you're laughing while people are having such a hard time hoppy, you should be ashamed of yourself
[Many Mexicans complain about his wealth. While most Mexicans earn only $14,500 per year, Slim is a multi-billionaire]
There's one laugh right there.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
1 person can feed Mexico's poor alone...
I don't know why you're laughing while people are having such a hard time hoppy, you should be ashamed of yourself
[Many Mexicans complain about his wealth. While most Mexicans earn only $14,500 per year, Slim is a multi-billionaire]
There's one laugh right there.:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl