Why China can but US can't?
China sends Ebola drug to Africa, eyes clinical trials
By Adam Jourdan October 16, 2014
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A Chinese drugmaker with military ties has sent an experimental Ebola drug to Africa for use by Chinese aid workers and is planning clinical trials there to combat the disease, executives at the firm told Reuters on Thursday.
Sihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd has supplied several thousand doses of its drug JK-05 to the region, Chief Operating Officer Jia Zhongxin said. More doses could be sent if needed, Jia said.
Sihuan, part-owned by U.S. investment bank Morgan Stanley, is hoping to get the drug fast-tracked for civilian use in China. It has signed an agreement with the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS), a research unit, to seek approval for the drug's use in China and push it to market.
The drug, approved in China for emergency military use only, was initially developed by AMMS.
If it proves to be an effective cure it would be a big prize for China's medical sector and a boost to China's soft power in Africa, an increasingly important partner for the world's second-biggest economy.
China's military has also given Sihuan the green-light to produce emergency supplies of the drug.
JK-05 has not been used on humans, although Sihuan says it has proven effective in tests on mice.
Its development lags some way behind U.S.-developed ZMapp and TKM-Ebola, which have been tested on monkeys and used on Ebola patients. However, analysts said the drug's similarities to Japanese influenza drug Favipiravir is an encouraging sign.
China sends Ebola drug to Africa, eyes clinical trials
Why China can but US can't?
Why China can but US can't?
Because China cares less whether the thing kills more people than it heals.
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
The home of the soul is the Open Road.
- DH Lawrence
- DH Lawrence
Why China can but US can't?
LarsMac;1466573 wrote: Because China cares less whether the thing kills more people than it heals.
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
Harsh as it may sound, that's the best way to test new treatments. No hope replaced with some hope.
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
Harsh as it may sound, that's the best way to test new treatments. No hope replaced with some hope.
Why China can but US can't?
The Chinese probably already experimented on people with the drug, and it is probably weaponized and in their biological warfare arsenal. So it's no surprise they are ahead in that area of research. You get those kinds of advantages when you are an evil totalitarian state.
Why China can but US can't?
Nature has its own way of controlling the population. If a species gets too over populated, then it introduces a way to cut back the numbers - usually by famine. Otherwise it introduces disease - the most effective ones being those that are sexually transmitted. However, as modern medical science progresses, we are constantly fighting against Nature & in so doing bringing about our own demise in other ways.
Why China can but US can't?
FourPart;1466599 wrote: we are constantly fighting against Nature.
And, apparently, Nature is always fighting back. (See: MERSA)
And, apparently, Nature is always fighting back. (See: MERSA)
Why China can but US can't?
I presume you mean MRSA - precisely.
Why China can but US can't?
LarsMac;1466573 wrote: Because China cares less whether the thing kills more people than it heals.
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
Then what is this?
It’s all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims’ blood
September 21, 2014
The United States government now owns the patent on Ebola
This plot gets even more interesting when you realize that a patent on Ebola was awarded to the United States government just four years ago, in 2010.
That patent, number CA2741523A1, is available here.
Astonishingly, the patent claims U.S. government ownership over all variants of Ebola which share 70% or more of the protein sequences described in the patent: “[CLAIMS] …a nucleotide sequence of at least 70%-99% identity to the SEQ ID…”
It's all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims' blood - Intellihub.com!
There is certain logic to that, as the people that will get the stuff are probably just as likely to die if they don't get it.
Then what is this?
It’s all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims’ blood
September 21, 2014
The United States government now owns the patent on Ebola
This plot gets even more interesting when you realize that a patent on Ebola was awarded to the United States government just four years ago, in 2010.
That patent, number CA2741523A1, is available here.
Astonishingly, the patent claims U.S. government ownership over all variants of Ebola which share 70% or more of the protein sequences described in the patent: “[CLAIMS] …a nucleotide sequence of at least 70%-99% identity to the SEQ ID…”
It's all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims' blood - Intellihub.com!
Why China can but US can't?
katsung47;1466611 wrote: Then what is this?
Its all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims blood
September 21, 2014
The United States government now owns the patent on Ebola
This plot gets even more interesting when you realize that a patent on Ebola was awarded to the United States government just four years ago, in 2010.
That patent, number CA2741523A1, is available here.
Astonishingly, the patent claims U.S. government ownership over all variants of Ebola which share 70% or more of the protein sequences described in the patent: [CLAIMS] a nucleotide sequence of at least 70%-99% identity to the SEQ ID
It's all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims' blood - Intellihub.com!
This might help you to understand:
snopes.com: Does the CDC Own an Ebola Patent?
The CDC does hold some patents on life forms, but it generally does this for the common good, so a commercial company can't come along and patent it. The CDC lets researchers work with the strain without fees.
Its all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims blood
September 21, 2014
The United States government now owns the patent on Ebola
This plot gets even more interesting when you realize that a patent on Ebola was awarded to the United States government just four years ago, in 2010.
That patent, number CA2741523A1, is available here.
Astonishingly, the patent claims U.S. government ownership over all variants of Ebola which share 70% or more of the protein sequences described in the patent: [CLAIMS] a nucleotide sequence of at least 70%-99% identity to the SEQ ID
It's all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims' blood - Intellihub.com!
This might help you to understand:
snopes.com: Does the CDC Own an Ebola Patent?
The CDC does hold some patents on life forms, but it generally does this for the common good, so a commercial company can't come along and patent it. The CDC lets researchers work with the strain without fees.
The home of the soul is the Open Road.
- DH Lawrence
- DH Lawrence
Why China can but US can't?
Even so, a patent isn't as restrictive as you might think. For example. Coca-Cola were the first to patent the drink, but it wasn't long before rival companies came up with generic products using exactly the same ingredients.
Furthermore, one of the definitive things about a virus is that it is constantly modifying itself, so that what may have been patented, won't stay as that indefinitely, and how much does something have to be different from its previous incarnation before it can be regarded as a different life form / virus in its own right?
Quite frankly the whole thing of claiming that the Americans own the Patent is a load of garbage. It's like the Conspiricists claims that they never landed on the moon. American Patent Law is limited to America. Only American companies are really bound by it. Do you really believe that the Russians, Saudi or Korea wouldn't try to develop it as a Commercial Biological Weapon just because America has it Patented?
Furthermore, one of the definitive things about a virus is that it is constantly modifying itself, so that what may have been patented, won't stay as that indefinitely, and how much does something have to be different from its previous incarnation before it can be regarded as a different life form / virus in its own right?
Quite frankly the whole thing of claiming that the Americans own the Patent is a load of garbage. It's like the Conspiricists claims that they never landed on the moon. American Patent Law is limited to America. Only American companies are really bound by it. Do you really believe that the Russians, Saudi or Korea wouldn't try to develop it as a Commercial Biological Weapon just because America has it Patented?
Why China can but US can't?
Saint_;1466593 wrote: The Chinese probably already experimented on people with the drug, and it is probably weaponized and in their biological warfare arsenal. So it's no surprise they are ahead in that area of research. You get those kinds of advantages when you are an evil totalitarian state.
Curious then the britain and the US (thanks to us sharing our research) led the way in developing biological weapons - mind you maybe the chinese got their hands on the research into flu viruses carried out by the japanese on the chinese population to get a head start.
Curious then the britain and the US (thanks to us sharing our research) led the way in developing biological weapons - mind you maybe the chinese got their hands on the research into flu viruses carried out by the japanese on the chinese population to get a head start.
Why China can but US can't?
This news tell you that the Feds has the drug to cure Ebola already. They won't use it now because they have a murder plot pending.
Recovery of US Ebola patients renews focus on treatment
CIDRAP News
Aug 21, 2014
Two medical missionaries who were infected with Ebola virus in Liberia and were evacuated to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta about 3 weeks ago have recovered and been discharged, with Kent Brantly, MD, thanking staff at a hospital press conference today.
In a surprise announcement, hospital officials said Brantly's colleague, Nancy Writebol, was discharged on Aug 19—quietly, at her request—and is spending time with her husband at an undisclosed location.
According to media reports, the two patients were treated with the experimental EVD drug ZMapp while in Liberia, and Brantly reportedly received convalescent serum from a patient who had recovered from the illness.
http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-persp...ocus-treatment
Ebola is one of the most dangerous disease. There is no reason Pentagon won't develop it as a bio-weapon. This news proves the cure drug was developed already.
They didn't save Duncan's life because they need death to scare people. Ebola breakout is nearly three months. They can't produce the cure drug ZMapp although it has been formatted, pattened. Do you believe it? Consider it is an emergence, consider it is dangerous?
Recovery of US Ebola patients renews focus on treatment
CIDRAP News
Aug 21, 2014
Two medical missionaries who were infected with Ebola virus in Liberia and were evacuated to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta about 3 weeks ago have recovered and been discharged, with Kent Brantly, MD, thanking staff at a hospital press conference today.
In a surprise announcement, hospital officials said Brantly's colleague, Nancy Writebol, was discharged on Aug 19—quietly, at her request—and is spending time with her husband at an undisclosed location.
According to media reports, the two patients were treated with the experimental EVD drug ZMapp while in Liberia, and Brantly reportedly received convalescent serum from a patient who had recovered from the illness.
http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-persp...ocus-treatment
Ebola is one of the most dangerous disease. There is no reason Pentagon won't develop it as a bio-weapon. This news proves the cure drug was developed already.
They didn't save Duncan's life because they need death to scare people. Ebola breakout is nearly three months. They can't produce the cure drug ZMapp although it has been formatted, pattened. Do you believe it? Consider it is an emergence, consider it is dangerous?
Why China can but US can't?
katsung47;1467094 wrote: . There is no reason Pentagon won't develop it as a bio-weapon. This news proves the cure drug was developed already.
katsung47, it's no conspiracy theory to tell us what we already knew. Of course our government has already weaponized ebola and has a cure ready. That's the evil side of the world we live in. I'd expect them to do no less, since I expect the other evil people in the world are working along similar lines. The good of humanity is that we have not yet used such weapons on each other.
Remember katsung, hope is a good thing...maybe the best of things.
katsung47, it's no conspiracy theory to tell us what we already knew. Of course our government has already weaponized ebola and has a cure ready. That's the evil side of the world we live in. I'd expect them to do no less, since I expect the other evil people in the world are working along similar lines. The good of humanity is that we have not yet used such weapons on each other.
Remember katsung, hope is a good thing...maybe the best of things.
Why China can but US can't?
Ebola Outbreak Planned Years Ago! What Do You Think The Millions Of “Coffin Liners” Are For?
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
“An award-winning Texas scientist was given a standing ovation after he advocated the extermination of 90 per cent of the Earth’s population by an airborne Ebola virus.”
Pianka began his speech by condemning anthropocentrism, or the idea that the human race occupies a privileged position in nature. He exclaimed, “We’re no better than bacteria!”
“After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, ‘We’ve got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.’ “
Ebola Outbreak Planned Years Ago! What Do You Think The Millions Of "Coffin Liners" Are For? | Agenda 21
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
“An award-winning Texas scientist was given a standing ovation after he advocated the extermination of 90 per cent of the Earth’s population by an airborne Ebola virus.”
Pianka began his speech by condemning anthropocentrism, or the idea that the human race occupies a privileged position in nature. He exclaimed, “We’re no better than bacteria!”
“After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, ‘We’ve got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.’ “
Ebola Outbreak Planned Years Ago! What Do You Think The Millions Of "Coffin Liners" Are For? | Agenda 21
Why China can but US can't?
More typical Conspiracy Theoristism (is that the right word?). Total garbage aimed at the gullible. The main reason Biological Warfare is outlawed, apart from its humanitarian aspects, is that it's something that can't be controlled. It would only be a matter of time before it spread back to themselves, thus negating any benefits. Not only is it not practical as a weapon, it's not effective as it primarily affects those that don't have anything anyone else would want. Those who are so poor they can't even afford proper sanitation.
The whole basis of the article's argument seems to be based on pointing the finger of blame at those who develop a vaccine. This same line of thinking would make the likes of Louis Pasteur, Alexander Fleming and all those who have developed life saving vaccines through history utter demons.
Before you make such wild claims, try thinking them through logically. Who would it benefit & how? Who would even bother to invest a fortune in developing something that has no practical purpose?
The whole basis of the article's argument seems to be based on pointing the finger of blame at those who develop a vaccine. This same line of thinking would make the likes of Louis Pasteur, Alexander Fleming and all those who have developed life saving vaccines through history utter demons.
Before you make such wild claims, try thinking them through logically. Who would it benefit & how? Who would even bother to invest a fortune in developing something that has no practical purpose?