Allah (swt) created the foreskin in the first place, it protects that part of the baby’s body, but after birth is useless, just like the umbilical cord which is cut after birth.
many benefits, circumcision has been made obligatory in some religions like Islam. Some of those benefits are: prevention of infants and babies from infection of the urinal tract, penile cancer prevention, prevention of aids, etc.
Very delicious
Very delicious
macoooo;1492206 wrote: Allah (swt) created the foreskin in the first place, it protects that part of the baby’s body..............but after birth is useless................
God created it but man presumes the almighty is wrong ?
God created it but man presumes the almighty is wrong ?
I thought I knew more than this until I opened my mouth
Very delicious
Even if the umbilical cord is not cut it will fall away once it has served its function. The foreskin does not. It is designed by nature to protect the glans from injury.
My primary point, though, is that if an adult chooses to mutilate himself in the name of superstition, then that's his own decision. I have no problem with that. What I find sickening is that the mutilation be imposed on newborn babies who have no say in the matter.
My primary point, though, is that if an adult chooses to mutilate himself in the name of superstition, then that's his own decision. I have no problem with that. What I find sickening is that the mutilation be imposed on newborn babies who have no say in the matter.
Very delicious
FourPart;1492209 wrote: Even if the umbilical cord is not cut it will fall away once it has served its function. The foreskin does not. It is designed by nature to protect the glans from injury.
Thanks for the lecture.
FourPart;1492209 wrote: My primary point, though, is that if an adult chooses to mutilate himself in the name of superstition, then that's his own decision. I have no problem with that.
Very generous of you.
FourPart;1492209 wrote: What I find sickening is that the mutilation be imposed on newborn babies who have no say in the matter.
Your are right, babies have no say in that matter.
Thanks for the lecture.
FourPart;1492209 wrote: My primary point, though, is that if an adult chooses to mutilate himself in the name of superstition, then that's his own decision. I have no problem with that.
Very generous of you.
FourPart;1492209 wrote: What I find sickening is that the mutilation be imposed on newborn babies who have no say in the matter.
Your are right, babies have no say in that matter.
What happened to Kamala Harris' campaign?
She had the black vote all locked up.
She had the black vote all locked up.
Very delicious
It's about the power priests have over the populace. If you can get a parent to mutilate their own children you have them under your control, body and soul, totally subservient to your will.
Very delicious
gmc;1492231 wrote: It's about the power priests have over the populace.
Magical powers, ,
gmc;1492231 wrote: If you can get a parent to mutilate their own children you have them under your control, body and soul, totally subservient to your will.
Seriously?:wah:
Magical powers, ,
gmc;1492231 wrote: If you can get a parent to mutilate their own children you have them under your control, body and soul, totally subservient to your will.
Seriously?:wah:
What happened to Kamala Harris' campaign?
She had the black vote all locked up.
She had the black vote all locked up.