UNIVERSAL MIND
I started this post so that others can become aware of the
existence of a Universal Mind. In other words, the spiritual
connectivity of all our feelings.
I will start by describing the links I have witnessed to prove to my
satisfaction that a Universal Mind exists. When I was about 9 or 10
years old, my father came home from work holding his side and
appearing to be in great pain. So, one of my older siblings had my
father taken to a hospital. It turned out that he had an attack of
appendicitis.
The link here is as follows:
My fathers mothers name was Fanceska. My aunt living
accross the street was named Francis. Her oldest daughter was named
Francis (all above are deseased). The daughter had her first child
delivered by caeasarean operation. This preceded my fathers attack of
appendicitis.
This coincidence does not necassarily convince most
people. I kept this in mind for over 35 years. Than when I got a
new job in a tool shop after a period of unemployment of a few
years, I was snag grinding and polishing (hand grinding and polishing)
a 3/4 round guard cam that operates with a feed cam to move cutting
tools. While polishing this cam on a SOFT polishing wheel, it grabbed
the cam out of my hands and spun around and struck me in the right
side of my abdomen. I rushed into the restroom to examine the damage.
There was nothing serious but a large red welt. So, I went back to work.
Now here is the clincher evidence that convinced me of the
existence of the Universal mind. The next day my forman had an
ABDOMINAL RUPTURE and our department was shut down for two weeks until
he recovered.
I noticed other such lesser coincidences to convince
myself that a UM is a reality.
Mike CT
Universal Mind
-
Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Universal Mind
It's apparent that you are a seer - a Nostradomas (sp?). Have you trained yourself to use these links to predict the future?
-
chonsigirl
- Posts: 33633
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:28 am
Universal Mind
I started this post so that others can become aware of the
existence of a Universal Mind. In other words, the spiritual
connectivity of all our feelings.
Read my mind................................I believe you have no connection whatsoever to my mind and feelings. Whether you do between other people or not, I have no statement. But it is definite you have no connection to mine.
existence of a Universal Mind. In other words, the spiritual
connectivity of all our feelings.
Read my mind................................I believe you have no connection whatsoever to my mind and feelings. Whether you do between other people or not, I have no statement. But it is definite you have no connection to mine.
Universal Mind
Accountable wrote: It's apparent that you are a seer - a Nostradomas (sp?). Have you trained yourself to use these links to predict the future?How about starting with tomorrow night's lottery numbers? If you win the millions, then I will accept the possibility that you are right.
Universal Mind
I would also like to draw peoples attention to the universal mind. I became aware of this one day in 1987 when I saw a brown haired man driving a ford fiesta, I did not remember this till one day in the 1990s I realized that I was also a man who had brown hair who was driving a car. It wasn't a ford, but it was still a car. So with my newly found powers I have decided to predict the future. My major prediction is that something bad is going to happen, somewhere, at some time in the future. In order to prevent this happening I will need 34.8 million Euros (or Dollar equivalent) to pay off the big man upstairs. Thank you for believing, you are very brave. :rolleyes:
PS, the truth is out there, and as long as you can provide the cash, I shall provide the truth on goldenrod paper, signed by the pope.
PS, the truth is out there, and as long as you can provide the cash, I shall provide the truth on goldenrod paper, signed by the pope.
"We are never so happy, never so unhappy, as we imagine"
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Universal Mind
To Accountable
I am not a 'seer' and I did not say I was. How did you come to that conclusion?
I said some of the events in my life can only occur if the Law of Probability is applied.
If you believe such occurences are accidental or coincidental, than that is your opinion. But I am a realist.
I said there are other such minor occurrences. You cannot rule these out as just coincidental. At least not in my opinion.
Mike CT
I am not a 'seer' and I did not say I was. How did you come to that conclusion?
I said some of the events in my life can only occur if the Law of Probability is applied.
If you believe such occurences are accidental or coincidental, than that is your opinion. But I am a realist.
I said there are other such minor occurrences. You cannot rule these out as just coincidental. At least not in my opinion.
Mike CT
Universal Mind
Mike CT wrote: If you believe such occurences are accidental or coincidental, than that is your opinion. But I am a realist.
Mike, my opinion is that the person who considers them coincidences is probably the realist.
Here are some of my favorite coincidences:
1. From which direction does NEWS come?
It comes from the...
N orth, from the...
E ast, from the...
W est, and, last but not least, from the...
S outh.
2. The first three men on earth, according to the Bible:
A dam,
A bel, and...
C ain.
The first three men on the moon:
A rmstrong,
A ldrin, and...
C ollins.
3. 'V' is the Roman numeral for 5.
Beethoven's FIFTH symphony begins 'dah dah dah DAHHHH - dah dah dah DAHHHH'.
Morse code for the letter 'V' is '...-' (didididah).
4. Fire trucks are red.
Russian communists are red.
Fire trucks are always rushin'.
Mike, my opinion is that the person who considers them coincidences is probably the realist.
Here are some of my favorite coincidences:
1. From which direction does NEWS come?
It comes from the...
N orth, from the...
E ast, from the...
W est, and, last but not least, from the...
S outh.
2. The first three men on earth, according to the Bible:
A dam,
A bel, and...
C ain.
The first three men on the moon:
A rmstrong,
A ldrin, and...
C ollins.
3. 'V' is the Roman numeral for 5.
Beethoven's FIFTH symphony begins 'dah dah dah DAHHHH - dah dah dah DAHHHH'.
Morse code for the letter 'V' is '...-' (didididah).
4. Fire trucks are red.
Russian communists are red.
Fire trucks are always rushin'.
Universal Mind
The number of coincidences is rather astonishing. In fact beyond statistical probability in many cases.
Quantum theory adds a whole new dimension to man's view of reality.
I believe it is called "God".
Shalom
Ted:-6
Quantum theory adds a whole new dimension to man's view of reality.
I believe it is called "God".
Shalom
Ted:-6
Universal Mind
Bronwen
Yeah, I enjoy a little humor. Ha Ha.
Ted
See my new post on Quantum theory in 'Soace and Astronomy'..
Mike CT
Yeah, I enjoy a little humor. Ha Ha.
Ted
See my new post on Quantum theory in 'Soace and Astronomy'..
Mike CT
Universal Mind
Ted wrote: The number of coincidences is rather astonishing. In fact beyond statistical probability in many cases.
Quantum theory adds a whole new dimension to man's view of reality.
I believe it is called "God".
I'm not sure I understand your point here, Theo-dore.
What is called 'God'? Coincidence, or QM, or something else?
Quantum theory adds a whole new dimension to man's view of reality.
I believe it is called "God".
I'm not sure I understand your point here, Theo-dore.
What is called 'God'? Coincidence, or QM, or something else?
Universal Mind
If anyone thinks that Quantum Mechanics implies the existence of God then they dont understand Quantum Mechanics, it neither proves nor disproves anything supernatural, it just means that nature is a bit more complicated than we used to think.
What is does imply is that if there is a God (different question) then he is a hell of a lot smarter than we are, and that would seem to be a good thing to me as I would expect the creator of the universe to be smarter than your average bear. Actually as an aside, I think that the further we get into understanding the Universe the clearer it becomes how awesome any divine creator must be, as the reality we have discovered is far more imaginative and wonderful than anything human beings could have come up with, i.e. fiery chariots, pillars of salt, big floods, heavenly choirs, 72 virgins waiting for the matrys of Islam, etc etc, all that stuff seems a bit pedestrian and well, just exactly like something that relatively unsophisticated people would dream up when trying to make sense of the everyday world. What science has found is that the universe is vast beyong human imagination with trillions of suns, planets, hundreds of billions of galaxies, all existing for billions of years etc etc, I don't wana start getting too cosmic, but its fairly mad when you think about it! :-2
What is does imply is that if there is a God (different question) then he is a hell of a lot smarter than we are, and that would seem to be a good thing to me as I would expect the creator of the universe to be smarter than your average bear. Actually as an aside, I think that the further we get into understanding the Universe the clearer it becomes how awesome any divine creator must be, as the reality we have discovered is far more imaginative and wonderful than anything human beings could have come up with, i.e. fiery chariots, pillars of salt, big floods, heavenly choirs, 72 virgins waiting for the matrys of Islam, etc etc, all that stuff seems a bit pedestrian and well, just exactly like something that relatively unsophisticated people would dream up when trying to make sense of the everyday world. What science has found is that the universe is vast beyong human imagination with trillions of suns, planets, hundreds of billions of galaxies, all existing for billions of years etc etc, I don't wana start getting too cosmic, but its fairly mad when you think about it! :-2
"We are never so happy, never so unhappy, as we imagine"
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Universal Mind
Galbally:-6
Some good posts. I can agree that QM neither proves nor disproves the existence of God. Yet in some ways I see some clear indications that we do not yet fully understand reality. I also see some circumstantial evidence that points to something outside of man.
Bronwen:-6
As per my post to Galbally there are a few scientists, well known in their field, who have no problem with the concept of a Divinity: Arthur Peacock, Paul Davis, and one named Birch or Burch, can't remember at the moment, a well known biologist in Australia. There are others that I could list with a little research.
Shalom
Ted:-6
Some good posts. I can agree that QM neither proves nor disproves the existence of God. Yet in some ways I see some clear indications that we do not yet fully understand reality. I also see some circumstantial evidence that points to something outside of man.
Bronwen:-6
As per my post to Galbally there are a few scientists, well known in their field, who have no problem with the concept of a Divinity: Arthur Peacock, Paul Davis, and one named Birch or Burch, can't remember at the moment, a well known biologist in Australia. There are others that I could list with a little research.
Shalom
Ted:-6
Universal Mind
Ted wrote: Galbally:-6
Some good posts. I can agree that QM neither proves nor disproves the existence of God. Yet in some ways I see some clear indications that we do not yet fully understand reality. I also see some circumstantial evidence that points to something outside of man.
We certainly do not fully understand reality, and any good scientist will immeadiatly agree, we have some very good theories, but they are as yet incomplete, and event if a unified theory is attained, it will more that likely just explain how reality works, not fundamentally what it is, such a question may never be answered scientifically, so religion and philosophy still has a big field to work in. There is of course plenty of circumstantial evidence that there is something beyond man, well the rest of the Universe for a start, its not a cut and dried case for their being a god, but it does leave room to imply that he exists, no argument there from me. Direct, measurable evidence, however, does not exist.
Bronwen:-6
As per my post to Galbally there are a few scientists, well known in their field, who have no problem with the concept of a Divinity: Arthur Peacock, Paul Davis, and one named Birch or Burch, can't remember at the moment, a well known biologist in Australia. There are others that I could list with a little research.
Shalom
Ted:-6
You will find that many many scientists, are normal religious people and are not all atheists at all, some are, but its not really a scientific question, so it doesn't get debated in science. Science as we currently understand gives room for almost all religious beliefs, it just tends to imply that things such as direct divine intervention, a 6,500 year old earth, and other such ideas are misplaced. So most of these science versus religion debates get centered on these kind of technical arguments about evidence for the theory of evolution and the like, which frankly are a bit pointless and go nowhere, I suppose they are all part of the debate, but I do get bored with them after a while.
Some good posts. I can agree that QM neither proves nor disproves the existence of God. Yet in some ways I see some clear indications that we do not yet fully understand reality. I also see some circumstantial evidence that points to something outside of man.
We certainly do not fully understand reality, and any good scientist will immeadiatly agree, we have some very good theories, but they are as yet incomplete, and event if a unified theory is attained, it will more that likely just explain how reality works, not fundamentally what it is, such a question may never be answered scientifically, so religion and philosophy still has a big field to work in. There is of course plenty of circumstantial evidence that there is something beyond man, well the rest of the Universe for a start, its not a cut and dried case for their being a god, but it does leave room to imply that he exists, no argument there from me. Direct, measurable evidence, however, does not exist.
Bronwen:-6
As per my post to Galbally there are a few scientists, well known in their field, who have no problem with the concept of a Divinity: Arthur Peacock, Paul Davis, and one named Birch or Burch, can't remember at the moment, a well known biologist in Australia. There are others that I could list with a little research.
Shalom
Ted:-6
You will find that many many scientists, are normal religious people and are not all atheists at all, some are, but its not really a scientific question, so it doesn't get debated in science. Science as we currently understand gives room for almost all religious beliefs, it just tends to imply that things such as direct divine intervention, a 6,500 year old earth, and other such ideas are misplaced. So most of these science versus religion debates get centered on these kind of technical arguments about evidence for the theory of evolution and the like, which frankly are a bit pointless and go nowhere, I suppose they are all part of the debate, but I do get bored with them after a while.
"We are never so happy, never so unhappy, as we imagine"
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Universal Mind
Galbally:-6
I am in agreement with you on science. No arguments here. I too get bored with some of the points.
Shalom
Ted:-6
I am in agreement with you on science. No arguments here. I too get bored with some of the points.
Shalom
Ted:-6
Universal Mind
Ted wrote: Bronwen: As per my post to Galbally there are a few scientists, well known in their field, who have no problem with the concept of a Divinity: Arthur Peacock, Paul Davis, and one named Birch or Burch, can't remember at the moment, a well known biologist in Australia. There are others that I could list with a little research.I would say that there are FAR more than 'a few'. I think that idea of 'atheist scientists' is overdone, promoted mainly by religious fanatics who can abide no view of the world other than their own.
To me (as a non-scientist but with a lively interest in nearly every branch of science), the fact that anything exists at all has always seemed to indicate that there must be a higher purpose.
To me (as a non-scientist but with a lively interest in nearly every branch of science), the fact that anything exists at all has always seemed to indicate that there must be a higher purpose.