Iran's Nuclear Activity
- Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Thoughts on Iran having a nuclear reactor?
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Accountable wrote: Thoughts on Iran having a nuclear reactor?
Scary, very scary in such an unstable region ....you can't reason with these people either.... some political nutter over here was advocating banning them from the football world cup to teach them a lesson....what ????
Scary, very scary in such an unstable region ....you can't reason with these people either.... some political nutter over here was advocating banning them from the football world cup to teach them a lesson....what ????
A smile is a window on your face to show your heart is home
- StupidCowboyTricks
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:51 pm
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Bez wrote: Scary, very scary in such an unstable region ....you can't reason with these people either.... some political nutter over here was advocating banning them from the football world cup to teach them a lesson....what ????
They were talking about that here too.
I guess they take it very seriously (soccer)
They were talking about that here too.
I guess they take it very seriously (soccer)
Someone asked me why I swear so much. I said, "Just becuss.":)
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Clipper wrote: Israel will never let it happen.....
One of the reasons that it's so scary.
One of the reasons that it's so scary.
A smile is a window on your face to show your heart is home
- Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Clipper wrote: Israel will never let it happen.....
You don't think the idiots representing us won't try to talk Israel down? It's happened several times before.
You don't think the idiots representing us won't try to talk Israel down? It's happened several times before.
- Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Their official stance, as I understand it, is that they're building the reactor for power rather than weaponry. I don't know if there is a significant difference in facilities.
People are already talking about possible military action. I can't imagine the American citizenry supporting it.
People are already talking about possible military action. I can't imagine the American citizenry supporting it.
- Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Iran's Nuclear Activity
The timing is odd. 9/11 came out of the blue, so we invaded Afghanistan. Strange thing that just about the same time we got Afghanistan buttoned up, Iraq raised it's head for the first real time in years. Now, Iraq has a new constitution & gov't. ......
..... the timing is odd. I don't like it at all.
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Clipper wrote: Israel will never let it happen.....
yep they wont,
because they are the only ones allowed to be the nutters with big guns in that part of the world.
and I agree arnold,
again,
this has nothing to do with us.
yep they wont,
because they are the only ones allowed to be the nutters with big guns in that part of the world.
and I agree arnold,
again,
this has nothing to do with us.
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Accountable wrote: Thoughts on Iran having a nuclear reactor?
not good. once they have a nuclear reactor, it won't take much to develope weapons grade plutonium. and when they do.... Bye-bye Israel
not good. once they have a nuclear reactor, it won't take much to develope weapons grade plutonium. and when they do.... Bye-bye Israel
Get your mind out of the gutter - it's blocking my view
Mind like a steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in 37 states.
- Uncle Kram
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:34 pm
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Wolverine wrote: not good. once they have a nuclear reactor, it won't take much to develope weapons grade plutonium. and when they do.... Bye-bye Israel
Bye-Bye Everyone
Bye-Bye Everyone

THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN PUN
- Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Wolverine wrote: not good. once they have a nuclear reactor, it won't take much to develope weapons grade plutonium. and when they do.... Bye-bye Israel
Would you feel the same if Israel were the one developing a reactor?
Would you feel the same if Israel were the one developing a reactor?
- Uncle Kram
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:34 pm
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Uncle Kram wrote: Israel isn't such a loose cannon
YES they are,
the only difference this is they are not a loose cannon against the west, everyone else in the middle east are fair game to Isreal.
it all Depends on who you are.
example,
Bosnia/Kosovo - There was a large Mujaheddin presence from all over the middle east fighting against the Serbs, in the case of Bosnia, Bosnian/Croatia related war crimes seemed to have largely played down, and in Kosovo NATO basically acted as the KLA (formally a terrorist group) air force.
Afghanistan/Iraq - a lot of the same Mujaheddin where deemed as enemies and beyond law, fighting against the coalition.
so the reason Israel are allowed to have nuclear weapon is because it suits the west for them to have them, and considering it treatment of non Jewish people in Israel and lands it occupies should not the west be 'having a go' at Israel for its nuclear capacity?
YES they are,
the only difference this is they are not a loose cannon against the west, everyone else in the middle east are fair game to Isreal.
it all Depends on who you are.
example,
Bosnia/Kosovo - There was a large Mujaheddin presence from all over the middle east fighting against the Serbs, in the case of Bosnia, Bosnian/Croatia related war crimes seemed to have largely played down, and in Kosovo NATO basically acted as the KLA (formally a terrorist group) air force.
Afghanistan/Iraq - a lot of the same Mujaheddin where deemed as enemies and beyond law, fighting against the coalition.
so the reason Israel are allowed to have nuclear weapon is because it suits the west for them to have them, and considering it treatment of non Jewish people in Israel and lands it occupies should not the west be 'having a go' at Israel for its nuclear capacity?
- Uncle Kram
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:34 pm
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Im saying Israel is not such a loose cannon. Israel clearly has blood on it's hands too, but I see them as the lesser evil as they are more likely to respond to reason and pressure. Israels arsenal must be seen as a deterrant in the region. In the unpredictability stakes, I'd be more worried about Iran, based on the hard-line stance of the new head honco.
THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN PUN
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Heres a thought. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. Do I think it would be a good idea ? No, scares the **** outta me. However to date we are the only ones that have actually detonated an atomic bomb. As long as they exist theres a threat. The big question is how are we going to stop it ? Are we going to invade Iran too ? Bad bad idea ! Un ? Uh yea that worked really well in inspecting Iraq's WMD's. I dont have an answer, I just know this is as bad as anything in a long time.
I AM AWESOME MAN
- capt_buzzard
- Posts: 5557
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:00 pm
Iran's Nuclear Activity
keep a watchful eye on Iran Mr Bush
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Accountable wrote: Thoughts on Iran having a nuclear reactor?
Even if they were developing nuclear weapons. So What?? France, England, Soviets, USA, Israel and China have them. Why not Iran? Is it because we view them as more of a threat? Given the fact that we (USA) have many, many nuclear devices, wouldn't make more sense to let them (if they are so inclined) fire the FIRST SHOT, and then totally wipe them off the face of the earth? There would be world support for such action on our part then with no argument or debate. I am not sure I agree with the U.S. proactive approach to this matter. It makes too many assumptions.
Even if they were developing nuclear weapons. So What?? France, England, Soviets, USA, Israel and China have them. Why not Iran? Is it because we view them as more of a threat? Given the fact that we (USA) have many, many nuclear devices, wouldn't make more sense to let them (if they are so inclined) fire the FIRST SHOT, and then totally wipe them off the face of the earth? There would be world support for such action on our part then with no argument or debate. I am not sure I agree with the U.S. proactive approach to this matter. It makes too many assumptions.
Iran's Nuclear Activity
capt_buzzard wrote: keep a watchful eye on Iran Mr Bush
OK...................who is keeping a watchful eye on Mr Bush?
OK...................who is keeping a watchful eye on Mr Bush?
Iran's Nuclear Activity
Hmm..
I find a country, whose leader has publicly advocated genocide, having nuclear weapons particularly frightening. A lot is said about Israel. If I were Israel I might have a bit of an itchy trigger finger myself, being surrounded by that lot. I'm not one for advocating military action unless it is absolutely necessary, but I think we need to keep a very close eye on Iran indeed.
I find a country, whose leader has publicly advocated genocide, having nuclear weapons particularly frightening. A lot is said about Israel. If I were Israel I might have a bit of an itchy trigger finger myself, being surrounded by that lot. I'm not one for advocating military action unless it is absolutely necessary, but I think we need to keep a very close eye on Iran indeed.