The Clinton - Saudi Connection

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:06 am

Remember Mike Moore's movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" that tried hard to establish another "vast right-wing conspiracy" between the Bush administration and the Saudi royal family? It appears the Saudi royal family is bi-partisan when they buy influnece, just like Jack Abramoff.

"Saudis, Arabs Bankrolled Clinton Library" - November 22, 2004

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004 ... 4848.shtml

Tombstone · Post by **Tombstone** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:15 am

Thinking about the Saudi Royal "Family" gives me a migraine. Their government and social policies are less progressive than the feudal system during the Middle Ages.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:12 pm

"FBI probes possible Saudi, 9/11 money ties" - November 23, 2002

"Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudis. The Saudi government has condemned their actions."

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/23/saudi.fbi.911/

So that's it? It's business as usual with the Saudi government. The whole thing smells fishy to me. Maybe I should be posting this in the conspiracy thread, but to me, this doesn't even pass the smell test. Keep following the money.

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:19 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: "FBI probes possible Saudi, 9/11 money ties" - November 23, 2002

"Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudis. The Saudi government has condemned their actions."

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/23/saudi.fbi.911/

So that's it? It's business as usual with the Saudi government. The whole thing smells fishy to me. Maybe I should be posting this in the conspiracy thread, but to me, this doesn't even pass the smell test. Keep following the money.

If you didn't stick your nose so far up fauxcasters butt's at faux news you might get rid of that smell.......

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:30 pm

Hey! I'd completely forgotten. Jives, SCT and one or two others were ganging up on me, and were going to tell me how Bush caused 9/11 because of his relationship with the Saudis.

I think this would be the perfect place to resurrect that discussion. You all can compare notes.

whodunnit? Clinton or Bush?

*grabs some popcorn and a comfortable chair*

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:00 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: "FBI probes possible Saudi, 9/11 money ties" - November 23, 2002

"Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudis. The Saudi government has condemned their actions."

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/23/saudi.fbi.911/

So that's it? It's business as usual with the Saudi government. The whole thing smells fishy to me. Maybe I should be posting this in the conspiracy thread, but to me, this doesn't even pass the smell test. Keep following the money.

your source makes me laugh:wah:

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:02 pm

Far Rider wrote: *stands shoulder to shoulder next to ACC*

What? Jives not on our side on that one? heh? No way!
Jives has facets. That's why I like & respect him so much. But to say Bush caused 9/11?? He said he has proof enough for days. I've got days.

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:03 pm

Accountable wrote: Jives has facets. That's why I like & respect him so much. But to say Bush caused 9/11?? He said he has proof enough for days. I've got days.

:wah:

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:02 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: If you didn't stick your nose so far up fauxcasters butt's at faux news you might get rid of that smell.......
Just for the record sunshine, the link was to "cnn", which many refer to as the "Clinton News Network." Does that ring a bell? Check my posts. You won't find one Internet link sourced to Fox. But why let the facts weigh you down. Travel light with lies...... :rolleyes:

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:28 am

ChiptBeef wrote: Just for the record sunshine, the link was to "cnn", which many refer to as the "Clinton News Network." Does that ring a bell? Check my posts. You won't find one Internet link sourced to Fox. But why let the facts weigh you down. Travel light with lies...... :rolleyes:

:wah:

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:41 am

Far Rider wrote: What!

OMG! he and I might need to Wrassle over this one!

Us three need to yahoo, I got some inside info that will knock your socks off!

Hmmmm??? :yh_think

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:33 pm

Accountable wrote: Jives has facets. That's why I like & respect him so much. But to say Bush caused 9/11?? He said he has proof enough for days. I've got days.

Two words... "Able Danger."