Internment camps to be extended

Post Reply
User avatar
spot
Posts: 41800
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: Brigstowe

Internment camps to be extended

Post by spot »

How many internees can be housed in $325 million worth of "contingency planning"?

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060124/20060124 ... &printer=1

"...provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs."

For "rapid development of new programs", read "mass internment on ethnic-selective lines, should events warm up a little". The bit about Immigration and Customs is what the trade calls a bit of misdirecting camoflage.
Nullius in verba ... ☎||||||||||| ... To Fate I sue, of other means bereft, the only refuge for the wretched left. ... Hold no regard for unsupported opinion.
When flower power came along I stood for Human Rights, marched around for peace and freedom, had some nooky every night - we took it serious. [Fred Wedlock, "The Folker"]
Who has a spare two minutes to play in this month's FG Trivia game! ... My other OS is Slackware.
golem
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:43 am

Internment camps to be extended

Post by golem »

Sounds to me like sound reasoning and common sense being applied. If a person immigrates to a country, that’s one thing, but recently we’ve seen , especially in the UK, settlements being established populated with people who have no intent to integrate.

Such people need to be identified and given an option.

Fit in, or get out.

In the event of hostilities it simply wouldn’t make sense to have what would amount to fifth columnists wandering free. We should be doing the same in the UK.



.
User avatar
spot
Posts: 41800
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: Brigstowe

Internment camps to be extended

Post by spot »

Someone else has finally mentioned the "contingency planning" detention facility in a web article, which is pleasing. It's in the gadfly Lew Rockwell newsletter, which automatically makes it contentious, propagandist and interesting.

The Republicans’ intolerance for debate makes many Americans uneasy about the real purpose of the $385 million detention camp that Halliburton is building in the US for the Bush administration.


http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts156.html

The rest of the article's a fun read too. I particularly liked "This is the first administration in my lifetime in which there is no debate. The absence of debate means there is no check on reckless and ill-advised policies and corrupt schemes."
Nullius in verba ... ☎||||||||||| ... To Fate I sue, of other means bereft, the only refuge for the wretched left. ... Hold no regard for unsupported opinion.
When flower power came along I stood for Human Rights, marched around for peace and freedom, had some nooky every night - we took it serious. [Fred Wedlock, "The Folker"]
Who has a spare two minutes to play in this month's FG Trivia game! ... My other OS is Slackware.
gmc
Posts: 13566
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:44 am

Internment camps to be extended

Post by gmc »

spot wrote: Someone else has finally mentioned the "contingency planning" detention facility in a web article, which is pleasing. It's in the gadfly Lew Rockwell newsletter, which automatically makes it contentious, propagandist and interesting.



http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts156.html

The rest of the article's a fun read too. I particularly liked "This is the first administration in my lifetime in which there is no debate. The absence of debate means there is no check on reckless and ill-advised policies and corrupt schemes."


We have Tony Blair and his cronies who are managing to make the loony left seem fine ethical upstanding politicians. Instead of the unions funding labour now we have them selling peerages and govt contracts. nothing like change for the better is there?

How do you feel about educational reforms voted on by Scottish MP's whose constituences are not affected at all by the proposals and indeed whose countrymen would reject them wholesale?
Post Reply

Return to “Social Human Rights”