Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

General discussion area for all topics not covered in the other forums.
Post Reply
User avatar
cars
Posts: 11012
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:00 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by cars »

Princess Diana's picture is on the cover of this months "People magazine". With the headline quote: Special Report Diana's Death - SHOCKING NEW EVIDENCE!

Inside, the article published such leading questions: "Did the Palace want Diana dead"? Was Diana Pregnant? Were Diana & Dodi engaged? Was Diana's Chauffeur a secret agent? Were Secret Agents spying on Diana? Was Diana's body Embalmed? Did a car bump Diana's car just before the crash?

It seems this tragedy will be a never ending story! :guitarist (Article was "6" pages long. The article went on to publish plausible retorts to all the questions)

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK, DO YOU BELIEVE THAT PRINCESS DI'S DEATH WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN AN ACCIDENT, "CAUSED" BY THE "MEDIA"?
Cars :)
User avatar
OpenMind
Posts: 8645
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:54 am

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by OpenMind »

I'm a natural-born conspiracist. Life is a conspiracy.
User avatar
Bez
Posts: 8942
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:37 am

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Bez »

Clipper wrote: I think if the driver of her car had been sober the Princess would be alive today......period.


I agree Clipper. If they'd been wearing seatbelts they would probably have survived. i believe it was a combination of things and if you like, negligence on the part of those that should have been protecting everyone in the car....drunk, speed, no seatbelts...it all adds up.



The cost of all these investigations would be better spent elsewhere....heaven knows there are enough needy causes out there. I'm sure Diana would rather have seen all this money spent on the african people who are dying because of famine ...even camels are dying through lack of water.
A smile is a window on your face to show your heart is home
Amie
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:29 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Amie »

I think there's a lot more to it than we will ever know, but I think that about a lot of things involving politicians and high powered peoples. :sneaky:
Frederick
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:35 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Frederick »

Maybe I'm a cold hearted b*stard, but when Diana died, I read it as just that - AN ITEM OF NEWS. Full stop, end of story. I genuinely wondered whether I was the only person not wailing and gnashing my teeth. It was mass hysteria on a scale never seen before, and something which I hope will never be repeated. Hour after hour people forced their kids to queue upto sign a book who 99% had never even met. Grief is a VERY private matter, and even now I am at a total loss to understand how it is possible to love somebody you have never met. She was a roving ambassador for Great Britain amongst other things. Even if the queen died tomorrow, there'd be none of the wailing and banging of heads against a brick wall. Good grief, where's the stiff upper lip on which our Empire was once built upon? For a while, I wondered whether or not there was something wrong with me mentally!

Remember, it was not just members of the aristocracy who disapproved of Dianals relationship - there must have been many who felt that their religion was not to be watered down or insulted by this liaison.
In HIM I place my trust.
User avatar
Rapunzel
Posts: 6509
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:47 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Rapunzel »

ArnoldLayne wrote: I normally poo-poo any conspiracy theory, wether it be about 9-11, Moon landings JFK but there are elements of this case that patently stink. Not least cos the bloody French are involved :rolleyes:


Hear! Hear!

It has to be said that her death was extremely convenient for the Royal family!

They have consistently denied Al Fayed a British passport (don't blame them for that one! ;) ) and so they would most definitely HATE the thought of an Egyptian half-brother (or sister) to Wills and Harry! (Particularly an Al-Fayed half-sibling!) :sneaky:
lady cop
Posts: 14744
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:00 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by lady cop »

i don't really care actually, i've seen too many similar tragedies. but there is no way in hell anyone could have arranged all the particular circumstances/factors in play that night and had them fall precisely into place... end of story. it was an accident.
User avatar
Rapunzel
Posts: 6509
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:47 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Rapunzel »

Frederick wrote: Maybe I'm a cold hearted b*stard, but when Diana died, I read it as just that - AN ITEM OF NEWS. Full stop, end of story. I genuinely wondered whether I was the only person not wailing and gnashing my teeth. It was mass hysteria on a scale never seen before, and something which I hope will never be repeated. Hour after hour people forced their kids to queue upto sign a book who 99% had never even met. Grief is a VERY private matter, and even now I am at a total loss to understand how it is possible to love somebody you have never met. She was a roving ambassador for Great Britain amongst other things. Even if the queen died tomorrow, there'd be none of the wailing and banging of heads against a brick wall. Good grief, where's the stiff upper lip on which our Empire was once built upon? For a while, I wondered whether or not there was something wrong with me mentally!

Remember, it was not just members of the aristocracy who disapproved of Dianals relationship - there must have been many who felt that their religion was not to be watered down or insulted by this liaison.


I heard about the accident on the late news, when they just reported her as having a broken arm or leg and, I think, a fractured rib! It certainly was NOT reported as anything more serious or potentially life-threatening!

I saw her as a breath of fresh air in a very staid and dusty Royal family! She was so normal compared to them! She took her kids to Thorpe Park and made them queue, for Pete's sake! She hugged the socks off them when they came home from school! She hugged sick people! And she never wore gloves!!! One feels the Queen would sully her purist hands if she were to touch a member of the working classes, why else does she always wear gloves to shake hands?

No, Charles' peers didn't approve of her, but then they didn't understand her.

The Royals are typical of that upper-class huntin' shootin' fishin' mentality.... if you don't understand it or don't think its worthy or acceptable.....kill it!

Diana was normal! She was a Mum! She was loving and caring! She didn't follow the Upperclass mentality, where they only show emotion to dogs and horses and where one leaves ones children to be brought up by Nanny! She brought the Royals into the 20th Century. She was young, vibrant and beautiful and it was shocking to see such a vivid and beautiful plant plucked before it had truly fully blossomed. There was so much more she could have done, so much more she could have given to her country! But boring old Charles, who cares more for his plants and his dusty old buildings than he does for his subjects, couldn't understand her and couldn't bear her usurping his limelight. Of course she had to go!

And how convenient for him that she did!!! :sneaky:

I laid flowers for her at the gates of Buckingham Palace and at the gates of Kensington Palace, and I lit a candle for her at St. James' Chapel.

I think the Monarchy is outdated; too rich; too staid; too antiquated. They have no idea what their subjects want or need. They don't deserve the sycophantic adoration they receive.

When the Queen dies, people will mourn, of course. But the woman is 80 in just a few days. She has lived a full and amazing life. So no, people will not weep and wail. They will not see a beautiful life trodden down. There will be no shock value.

I can only hope she grips tightly to her throne until Charles has popped his clogs and his horse-faced wife is booted out of the Palace on her behind!!
Amie
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:29 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by Amie »

lady cop wrote: i don't really care actually, i've seen too many similar tragedies. but there is no way in hell anyone could have arranged all the particular circumstances/factors in play that night and had them fall precisely into place... end of story. it was an accident.


clearly you don't watch 24 :wah:
User avatar
cars
Posts: 11012
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:00 pm

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by cars »

Rapunzel wrote: I heard about the accident on the late news, when they just reported her as having a broken arm or leg and, I think, a fractured rib! It certainly was NOT reported as anything more serious or potentially life-threatening!

I saw her as a breath of fresh air in a very staid and dusty Royal family! She was so normal compared to them! She took her kids to Thorpe Park and made them queue, for Pete's sake! She hugged the socks off them when they came home from school! She hugged sick people! And she never wore gloves!!! One feels the Queen would sully her purist hands if she were to touch a member of the working classes, why else does she always wear gloves to shake hands?

No, Charles' peers didn't approve of her, but then they didn't understand her.

The Royals are typical of that upper-class huntin' shootin' fishin' mentality.... if you don't understand it or don't think its worthy or acceptable.....kill it!

Diana was normal! She was a Mum! She was loving and caring! She didn't follow the Upperclass mentality, where they only show emotion to dogs and horses and where one leaves ones children to be brought up by Nanny! She brought the Royals into the 20th Century. She was young, vibrant and beautiful and it was shocking to see such a vivid and beautiful plant plucked before it had truly fully blossomed. There was so much more she could have done, so much more she could have given to her country! But boring old Charles, who cares more for his plants and his dusty old buildings than he does for his subjects, couldn't understand her and couldn't bear her usurping his limelight. Of course she had to go!

And how convenient for him that she did!!! :sneaky:

I laid flowers for her at the gates of Buckingham Palace and at the gates of Kensington Palace, and I lit a candle for her at St. James' Chapel.

I think the Monarchy is outdated; too rich; too staid; too antiquated. They have no idea what their subjects want or need. They don't deserve the sycophantic adoration they receive.

When the Queen dies, people will mourn, of course. But the woman is 80 in just a few days. She has lived a full and amazing life. So no, people will not weep and wail. They will not see a beautiful life trodden down. There will be no shock value.

I can only hope she grips tightly to her throne until Charles has popped his clogs and his horse-faced wife is booted out of the Palace on her behind!!


So I take it you're not really that "happy" with the "Royals"! Well, I'm not a Brit, but I to never did like the actions of Charles, & or as well as the Queen. "They" always said that Charles loved Carmela, even though he married Diana. And it seems it turned out to be true, he finally got to marry his love of his life, as you said, how convenient. The Queen was certainly very unhappy with the Diana -Dodi thing, as it turned out, "very convenient" ending for that matter as well. As it was mentioned by others, we will never "really" know the truth, only speculations.

They only truth as we know it is: Diana's Driver was DRUNK. Paparazzi were hounding Diana & Dodi, & chaising their car at excessive speeds. Excessive speed ended in deadly crash! :thinking:
Cars :)
weeder
Posts: 3130
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:05 am

Media will not let Princess Di rest is peace!

Post by weeder »

This sad sad situation IS very similar to the 40 year investigations regarding the assasinastion of JFK. There will never be a definitive answer that satisfys everyone. This sort of thing goes on forever when the victim of the tradgedy is someone who was very well loved. In both cases... Loved by people all over the world. I tend to believe the conspiracy theories surrounding the JFK incident. I guess I cant get my brain to wrap around the possibility that anyone could arrange to eliminate that lovely woman. I just remember thinking that if her life had gone the way it was supposed to... that that mother of 2 would not have been where she was that night. The way she was treated for so many years really must have done a number on her psyche. Her husband should be ashamed of himself... I dont care how royal he is. I dont see how the happy couple could be so happy... living with the knowledge of what was done emmotionally to Diana.

But then, if you look at Jackie Kennedy and the crap she put up with with her husband........ its all very difficult to understand.
[FONT=Microsoft Sans Serif][/FONT]
Post Reply

Return to “General Chit Chat”