there is an undercurrant of nastyness

abbey · Post by **abbey** » Wed May 03, 2006 12:52 pm

Clancy wrote: Maybe some of you would like us to put our posts through you for vetting now. Would that appease you ? :rolleyes:Come here while i frisk you for unseemly posts.

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Wed May 03, 2006 12:53 pm

Clancy wrote: Maybe some of you would like us to put our posts through you for vetting now. Would that appease you ? :rolleyes:

i really dont want to keep this going but clancy isent that the kind of post that has an undercurrant of nastyness?

Jives · Post by **Jives** » Wed May 03, 2006 12:53 pm

Clancy wrote: The joke was about a big fat lady and a weedy little guy ....It's slapstick humour the same kind you'd see in ANY Laurel & Hardy , Movie. for goodness sake ! we now have the joke police???

It was gross, crass and disgusting. Low class. That's the kind of thing we are trying to avoid.

LOOK AROUND ! I know of many other threads where there is earthier, and more risquÃƒ© humour ....and it's from a time when Snooze, nor, I happened to be members.....oh, and just for the record Your involved in some of them too .... LOOK AROUND AT TODAY'S POSTS as well while your at it, the ones where Snooze isn't the thread starter!

That's funny, I'm looking at the post you quoted and I don't see where I said anything about Snooze. Why did you bring her up?

I'm not going to change the way I see things , or what I find humorous to suit anyone.

lol. I never expected you to change, as a matter of fact that is most likely impossible for you at this stage. But then again, I changed, so maybe it's not after all.

I manage to stay within what I think is acceptable to the owners....and as I've had no complaints from them, I can only assume things are ok.

And yet the replies in this thread belie you. Surely you see that? If everything was OK, this thread would not exist.

If I find something offensive, I report it....why can't you do likewise?

I do report it. But, as you say, things don't seem to change. Anastrophe has said though, that he is beginning that process. More power to him, I'm all for a little heavier hand in the modding department.

Your inability to see anyone else in here apart from, Snooze, being risquÃƒ©, or using innuendo, is getting obssesive.... you have chosen to pick on Snooze constantly......it's beginning to look like bullying.

I didn't even mention Snooze. But you have, twice. Is that because you think she has a problem with excessive sexual connotation and innuendo?

I'm, going to ask you "Politely" to get off her back once and for all, or go tell everyone the same party line.

Why would that work? I've asked both you and her to be less risque, and yet you have ignored me constantly. In this post you even told me that you refuse to change any behavior of yours, no matter how the rest of us feel about it.

That pretty much shows the problem that this thread was designed to address. An unwillingness and inability to change.

;)

Jives · Post by **Jives** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:06 pm

Instead of dodging the question, why not reply Snooze?

How do you feel about the tone of the boards these days. Clancy's threats to me just a minute ago are a good example to start with.

I'll give you my opinion for free: I don't like the feel of the boards. We have lost a lot of the class we used to have, as well as the respect for each other we had.

anastrophe · Post by **anastrophe** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:21 pm

it's time for this thread to end. because it's pissing me off.

while complaining about nastyness and personal attacks, people are getting nasty and personally attacking each other.

does anyone here understand the concept of "unclear on the concept"?

get it?

Jives · Post by **Jives** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:32 pm

Clancy wrote: Your not the owner, nor are you a moderator.

I never said I was, but the very fact that this thread was started, and not by me proves that there are others who feel as I do.

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:33 pm

Great, now we pissed the boss off, yet again. I'm outta here.....

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:33 pm

TWEET!!! (Val makes "T" sign with hands)

Please, people, go look at that thread I posted. I was trying to get

people to see there is a way to disagree. Koan said in there that she

thought the pic was funny, and also the other scenario (RMcD in the

plane). Fine. I didn't. People are different.

I don't think Snooze should have to walk on eggshells around here

every time she wants to post something. The vast majority of

Snooze's posts crack me the heck up. She's probably gotten more

of these :yh_rotfl out of me than anybody else. Does that mean I

enjoyed the wedding photo pics? No, I didn't. (Sorry Snooze).

But if there are others who do, again, fine. And I'm not saying that

you only have to tell her in pm's that you didn't care for it, post if

you want, YOU shouldn't have to walk on eggshells, either, but do

it in a reasonable manner. Everyone here I think can handle that.

I disagreed with TOMBSTONE, for crying out loud. I didn't pm him.

I try always to thiink of how the home page looks to newbies or

guests who might see it. And I think starting a thread titled

"Undercurrant of Nastyness" just perpetuates any that existed.

Pants, I think I understand what you were trying to do, and

it's admirable, but please just consider my point.

Learn to let stuff DROP. We can do it, I know we can. No need for

everybody springing into action trying to get their "licks" in before

the other guy does.

These are all my thoughts and only my thoughts.

(Jives, please check that quote of Buttercup, it was my words!)

Thanks.

Jives · Post by **Jives** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:33 pm

anastrophe wrote: it's time for this thread to end. because it's pissing me off.

while complaining about nastyness and personal attacks, people are getting nasty and personally attacking each other.

does anyone here understand the concept of "unclear on the concept"?

get it?

Fair enough! I've said what I think! Kudos for the mod, Anastrophe, I was hoping you'd show up.

Jives · Post by **Jives** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:35 pm

valerie wrote: (Jives, please check that quote of Buttercup, it was my words!)

Thanks.

Whoops! My mistake!:o

pantsonfire321@aol.com · Wed May 03, 2006 1:43 pm

valerie wrote: TWEET!!! (Val makes "T" sign with hands)

Please, people, go look at that thread I posted. I was trying to get

people to see there is a way to disagree. Koan said in there that she

thought the pic was funny, and also the other scenario (RMcD in the

plane). Fine. I didn't. People are different.

I don't think Snooze should have to walk on eggshells around here

every time she wants to post something. The vast majority of

Snooze's posts crack me the heck up. She's probably gotten more

of these :yh_rotfl out of me than anybody else. Does that mean I

enjoyed the wedding photo pics? No, I didn't. (Sorry Snooze).

But if there are others who do, again, fine. And I'm not saying that

you only have to tell her in pm's that you didn't care for it, post if

you want, YOU shouldn't have to walk on eggshells, either, but do

it in a reasonable manner. Everyone here I think can handle that.

I disagreed with TOMBSTONE, for crying out loud. I didn't pm him.

I try always to thiink of how the home page looks to newbies or

guests who might see it. And I think starting a thread titled

"Undercurrant of Nastyness" just perpetuates any that existed.

Pants, I think I understand what you were trying to do, and

it's admirable, but please just consider my point.

Learn to let stuff DROP. We can do it, I know we can. No need for

everybody springing into action trying to get their "licks" in before

the other guy does.

These are all my thoughts and only my thoughts.

(Jives, please check that quote of Buttercup, it was my words!)

Thanks.

Point taken

i completey understand what you mean.

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Wed May 03, 2006 1:45 pm

pantsonfire321@aol.com wrote: Point taken

i completey understand what you mean.

Very gracious of you, my dear, thank you.

:-6

minks · Post by **minks** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:03 pm

Maybe some of us prefer the old "tone" of the FG

And some of us prefer the new "tone" of the FG.

Hence the tensions.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:08 pm

SnoozeControl wrote: Sorry Pants, I'll try to stop mocking Spot and Arnold. It'll be difficult though (notice how I didn't say "it'll be hard"? I'm nobody's fool.)

Oh contraire.

:D

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:10 pm

have you guys been doing this all day ?

:wah: :wah: :wah: :wah:

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:15 pm

BabyRider wrote: Yeah, well, I'm starting to get the story and it seems people are running around trying to act like moderators, when there aren't any. You know what guys? If any wrist-slapping needs to be done around here, it should be admin that does it, not other members. We have no moderators and people should not assume to take that position.

WRONG !

Ill slap wrists from here to Kuala Lampur.

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:17 pm

Nomad wrote: WRONG !

Ill slap wrists from here to Kuala Lampur.

I ain't a-skeered of YOU! :p

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:19 pm

BabyRider wrote: I ain't a-skeered of YOU! :p

Me niether !:yh_beatup

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:20 pm

why cant I scare anyone ! :-5

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:21 pm

ArnoldLayne wrote: I am :-3

Thank you Arnold

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:21 pm

Nomad wrote: why cant I scare anyone ! :-5
Because we all know you're really a cuddly-wuddly, squishy-soft, snuggly little fluffy-kins!

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:23 pm

[quote=BabyRider]Because we all know you're really a cuddly-wuddly, squishy-soft, snuggly little fluffy-kins![/quote]

:yh_rotfl

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:26 pm

BabyRider wrote: Because we all know you're really a cuddly-wuddly, squishy-soft, snuggly little fluffy-kins!

PBBBTTHHH !

I demand fear !

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:29 pm

Nomad wrote: I demand fear !

Okie dokie, sweetums....we're all sitting here quaking in terror from your fearsome....

Er...

pffft..

mmmmph....

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! I just couldn't do it without cracking up!!! :yh_rotfl

minks · Post by **minks** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:29 pm

Nomad wrote: PBBBTTHHH !

I demand fear !

didn't you get flooded with fluffy baby animal pictures the last time you tried this?

FEAR NOMAD!!

Attached files

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:33 pm

minks wrote: didn't you get flooded with fluffy baby animal pictures the last time you tried this?

FEAR NOMAD!!

We're not going to 'pander ' to him this time...right ?

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:33 pm

stop it

:-3

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:35 pm

you kids are incorrigible

you'd fight about cotton balls.....*whoops* didnt mean to plant a seed :rolleyes:

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:37 pm

Oh, cottontail bunnies...................

Attached files

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:40 pm

Nomad wrote: you kids are incorrigible

you'd fight about cotton balls.....*whoops* didnt mean to plant a seed :rolleyes:

Oh yes you did, I know you!!

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:41 pm

'snuggly little fluffy-kins'

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:44 pm

Bez wrote: 'snuggly little fluffy-kins'
Awwww....what a gorgeous animal!! That is an Arctic fox, isn't it, Bez?

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Wed May 03, 2006 2:49 pm

For His Nomadness:

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 3:06 pm

valerie wrote: For His Nomadness:

Val

Do you want to be Nomad-ed in public ? :sneaky:

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 3:11 pm

BabyRider wrote: Awwww....what a gorgeous animal!! That is an Arctic fox, isn't it, Bez?

Yes...can't get more fluffykins than that :-6

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed May 03, 2006 3:12 pm

Bez wrote: Yes...can't get more fluffykins than that :-6

You cruisin for a bruisin baby ?

:-4

Bez · Post by **Bez** » Wed May 03, 2006 3:13 pm

Nomad wrote: You cruisin for a bruisin baby ?

:-4

You and whos army cuddly chops