I think this is irresponsible

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:57 pm

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200607 ... B4BG8.html

This article doesn't report that the Mom was speaking entirely in

Spanish (my local paper had it) and I wonder why? Your husband is

a carpet layer and now you've got NINE kids?

Bet taxpayers footed the bill, too.

:(

CARLA · Post by **CARLA** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:06 pm

Yikes and they live in a 1 bedroom apartment. :-3 Of course they will get aid for each child and food, and possible rent free housing on the State that's they way we do things here in California. :-5

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:39 pm

Very irresponsible, Val, you're right. I can understand the want for a large family, but if you can't afford it, (and if they're living in a 1 bedroom apartment obviously they can't) it is just wrong. And it's the kids that will pay the price. Geeze there are some people with ZERO common sense.

pantsonfire321@aol.com · Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:13 pm

Thats nothing, the UK has the monopoly on benefit scrounging - some familys have 13/14 kids and a couple of generations claiming benefits they see it as their right not some thing to fall back on in hard times. They breed children like animals and they grow up to ponce benefits just like mummy and daddy .You would be suprised how many men have 5/6/7 kids by 3/4/5 different women its utterly disgraceful. :-5

ice maiden · Post by **ice maiden** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:40 am

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006310610,00.html

read this one

pantsonfire321@aol.com · Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:57 am

ice maiden wrote: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006310610,00.html

read this one

blimey after 20 kids you wouldn't think her new bloke would touch the sides

11 times a night my arse

valerie · Post by **valerie** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:18 am

Diuretic wrote: If carpet was the only thing he was laying this wouldn't have happened.

:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl