Snoop dog

Carl44 · Post by **Carl44** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:27 am

magenta flame;599981 wrote: And I suppose we'll have to defend our reasons:rolleyes:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/20 ... 907342.htm

Can someone tell me one good reason why he should be allowed into the country

well you do have salt water crocs ,deadly snakes and spiders ,it would be a real shame if any thing happened to him ,oh and MF to contend with :-3

can some one tell me why he wants to go there :wah: :wah:

Elvira · Post by **Elvira** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:46 am

magenta flame;599981 wrote: And I suppose we'll have to defend our reasons:rolleyes:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/20 ... 907342.htm

Can someone tell me one good reason why he should be allowed into the country

For the same reason that a known convicted rapist (boxer) was allowed into the country! (bet he didn't even have to get a work permit to fight!!!0

Answer! - Because our government will make money out of it!

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:50 am

Personally...ummm I wish we could BAN him and so many other rappers...I don't blame Australia or the UK...he needs to go form a "Rapper Island" and let them all do their "thing" on thier own little Island...

sunny104 · Post by **sunny104** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:05 am

he's a celebrity, what's the big deal?

LilacDragon · Post by **LilacDragon** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:42 am

OK - please don't anyone be offended but I really had a laugh when I heard this on the news this morning.

For a country that was originally populated with the convicts of England to bann someone because of their arrest record is kind of ironic, isn't it.

Oh - and I am NOT a fan and wish that we could find a way to ban him from the U.S. A.

cars · Post by **cars** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:16 am

Getting back to the Dog, YES he should be banned! As well as any of the other "celebs" that are arrested for Drugs & Disorderly conduct! "Celebs" are the ones that our youngsters look up too, & follow their lead. So the celebs should set good examples! (Not to mention the Dog was already warned)

Stitchmom · Post by **Stitchmom** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:40 am

WonderWendy3;600033 wrote: Personally...ummm I wish we could BAN him and so many other rappers...I don't blame Australia or the UK...he needs to go form a "Rapper Island" and let them all do their "thing" on thier own little Island...

I can see your point. For me, it isn't him personally, but the industry in general who profit from the lyrics and bad messages their music sends our youth. No matter where you live, it isn't cool for your son to call his girlfriend a 'ho. Not cool to think packing a pistol is the way of life either. JMHO

Richard Bell · Post by **Richard Bell** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:14 am

magenta flame;599981 wrote: And I suppose we'll have to defend our reasons:rolleyes:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/20 ... 907342.htm

Can someone tell me one good reason why he should be allowed into the country

Meanwhile , in another far flung corner of the Empire :

An Indian court issued arrest warrants for Hollywood actor Richard Gere and Bollywood star Shilpa Shetty on Thursday, saying their kiss at a public function "transgressed all limits of vulgarity," media reports said.

Judge Dinesh Gupta earlier viewed television footage of the event, which he called "highly sexually erotic," saying the pair violated India's strict public obscenity laws.

Does this make Gere a Shetty kisser ?

Richard Bell · Post by **Richard Bell** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:20 am

magenta flame;600064 wrote: don't be offended? Oh sorry but does it matter that you only offend a minority here?

bullshit you didn't mean to offend.don't give me that effing **** .

happy in your own history are you? gee I'd hate for you to know what you're talking about

Well, y'see, all them Americans are Pilgrims, and Pilgrims are crazy for turkey, so I think the comment was a result of a tryptophan OD.

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:07 am

No. Those things against him aren't enough to warrant banning him. I find it really amusing that some other country is presumptuous enough to ban anyone due to their *character.* Let Australia clean up its own losers.

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:07 am

Rut Roh

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:11 am

YZGI;600162 wrote: Rut Roh

Astro, is that you??? George was looking for you....

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:13 am

magenta flame;599981 wrote:

Can someone tell me one good reason why he should be allowed into the country

Erm... I can't think of one.

Richard Bell · Post by **Richard Bell** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:11 am

Pinky;600166 wrote: America is notorious for being fussy about who they let in as well. Same thing really.

Yep.

This was the nation that barred that badasss gangsta mutha Charlie Chaplin in 1953 .

From the International Herald-Tribune, April 16, 1953 :

WASHINGTON: Charlie Chaplin has surrendered his United States re-entry permit. The Justice Department last year posted a stop order against Mr. Chaplin at all American ports after he had gone to Europe on a visit. Former Attorney General James P. McGranery questioned his right to return, asserting that if the actor did come back he would have to establish his entry rights "like any other alien." Mr. McGranery said his action was prompted by "public charges" associating Mr. Chaplin with Communism.

Yes, America looked upon The Little Tramp as a threat to it's security.:yh_rotfl

zinkyusa · Post by **zinkyusa** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:28 am

Richard Bell;600225 wrote: Yep.

This was the nation that barred that badasss gangsta mutha Charlie Chaplin in 1953 .

From the International Herald-Tribune, April 16, 1953 :

Yes, America looked upon The Little Tramp as a threat to it's security.:yh_rotfl

I think it was his little brush mustache:-3

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:29 am

Richard Bell;600225 wrote: Yep.

This was the nation that barred that badasss gangsta mutha Charlie Chaplin in 1953 .

From the International Herald-Tribune, April 16, 1953 :

Yes, America looked upon The Little Tramp as a threat to it's security.:yh_rotfl
You try walking like him across our borders.

:wah:

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:43 pm

Sorry. It's my fault.

I told him ya gots some real whizzny dope down under and I guess he took me seriously.

I'll see if I can get him to go to Thailand instead.

Jamesblonde · Post by **Jamesblonde** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:11 pm

magenta flame;599981 wrote:

Can someone tell me one good reason why he should be allowed into the country

Yep. He's ****.

We used stick mugshots of him and eminem on targets to improve our aim through incentive.

Jamesblonde · Post by **Jamesblonde** » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Pinky;600714 wrote: Think I'll try that!:wah:

Funny, I got some of my best shot groupings ever on those targets. You should see what a 40mm HE round does to an Eminem effigy.

cars · Post by **cars** » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:58 pm

Dog said if he only snorted "one" line a week then would they let him in!:wah:

Attached files

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 pm

cars;601669 wrote: Dog said if he only snorted "one" line a week then would they let him in!:wah:

:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl

Good one Cars!!

laneybug · Post by **laneybug** » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:18 pm

sunny104;600038 wrote: he's a celebrity, what's the big deal?

Uhh... when did being a celebrity and an entertainer mean that you had the right to be a sh*t stain on the world? If you're famous, and your actions are seen by the world over, we should be holding these people to a standard of responsibility that we'd hold any other person, if not higher. Ban the guy, I don't care, and if he could be banned from the US I'd be all for it. Along with 50 Cent, Eminem, and all the other "gangsta" mofos. I think it's sad and disgusting that our children look up to these morons and that these "entertainers" don't give a crap how they influence them.

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:08 pm

laneybug;601684 wrote: Uhh... when did being a celebrity and an entertainer mean that you had the right to be a sh*t stain on the world? If you're famous, and your actions are seen by the world over, we should be holding these people to a standard of responsibility that we'd hold any other person, if not higher. Ban the guy, I don't care, and if he could be banned from the US I'd be all for it. Along with 50 Cent, Eminem, and all the other "gangsta" mofos. I think it's sad and disgusting that our children look up to these morons and that these "entertainers" don't give a crap how they influence them.

:yh_clap :yh_clap Laneybug for PRES!!!

laneybug · Post by **laneybug** » Tue May 01, 2007 4:29 pm

WonderWendy3;601714 wrote: :yh_clap :yh_clap Laneybug for PRES!!!

Ahhh.... you're makin' me blush. :-4

I don't know.... I'd probably be the first to be assassinated by a rapper.... :wah:

neffy · Post by **neffy** » Wed May 02, 2007 4:42 am

WonderWendy3;600033 wrote: Personally...ummm I wish we could BAN him and so many other rappers...I don't blame Australia or the UK...he needs to go form a "Rapper Island" and let them all do their "thing" on thier own little Island...

i can undersatnd but i do like rapp music and you think at the age of 45 i would like something else.I went to see eminem 4 years ago and loved it.I agree some rappers use music as an excuse to use volence,which in this day and age is not good.

sunny104 · Post by **sunny104** » Wed May 02, 2007 6:31 am

laneybug;601684 wrote: Uhh... when did being a celebrity and an entertainer mean that you had the right to be a sh*t stain on the world? If you're famous, and your actions are seen by the world over, we should be holding these people to a standard of responsibility that we'd hold any other person, if not higher. Ban the guy, I don't care, and if he could be banned from the US I'd be all for it. Along with 50 Cent, Eminem, and all the other "gangsta" mofos. I think it's sad and disgusting that our children look up to these morons and that these "entertainers" don't give a crap how they influence them.

:-2

um, NO celebrity is perfect so where do you draw the line??

even the cute little white girls admit to doing drugs, etc. why only focus on rappers??

And, personally I don't hold anyone, celebrity or not "to a standard of responsibility"....how anyone chooses to live their life is no concern to me.

laneybug · Post by **laneybug** » Wed May 02, 2007 5:12 pm

sunny104;604500 wrote: :-2

um, NO celebrity is perfect so where do you draw the line??

even the cute little white girls admit to doing drugs, etc. why only focus on rappers??

And, personally I don't hold anyone, celebrity or not "to a standard of responsibility"....how anyone chooses to live their life is no concern to me.

You're right... no celebrity is perfect, so why are they idolized?

I don't just focus on rappers, that just happened to be the topic. By the way, when did race get into this?

They shouldn't be able to hide behind the mask of celebrity or entertainer and bear no consequences that the rest of us would if we were to behave in the same way. That's what I mean by "standard of responsibility."

How someone chooses to live their life is fine, just please don't influence our next generation to be a bunch of punks. And that, sunny104, is definitely a concern to me.