Some of you have seen that African proverb I like so much that says "All you are is in the palm of your hand." Well I got to thinking about how that could be construed.
How far should one ride on the legacy (good or bad) of one's family? You see in movies how people are so proud to "hail from" their rich, well to do status bound ancestors. We tend to think that if you're from a family that produces millionaires, doctors, lawyers or just people with a strong personal code of ethics, that you must be the same way but this isn't always so.
The people who jump to claim their stellar heritage are not the ones related to outlaws, criminals, lowlifes or dregs of the earth.
I come from a line of farmers and ranchers on one side and proper German immigrants on the other side. Mostly good and decent people in spite of their many quirks. So does that make me good and decent by proxy? Can I claim that? If I do, don't I also have to claim my skinhead Aryan pride cousin? And my cousin who is now Muslim? And the outlaws of generations long ago? And my drunkard relatives who can't hold jobs? Isn't that only fair?
Human nature requires companionship, to belong to a clan of sorts. To have an identity and often much of that identity comes from those who came before us, are yet to be born and who are here now. People to belong to.
Or are people solely responsible for their own legacy?
Edit: I just realized something I said that came out wrong. I was not implying there's something wrong with my cousin being a Muslim. There isn't except that she's weird about it. That's all. That just came out all wrong.